Effect of Low GI/ Glycemic Load (GL) Diet in Diabetic Nephropathy Patients

March 9, 2015 updated by: Leila Azadbakht, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Effect of Dietary Glycemic Index/Load on Kidney-related Biomarkers and Inflammation in Diabetic Nephropathy Patients

low GI and low GL diet have more beneficial effect for diabetic nephropath patients compared with conventional diet.

low GL may have more favorable effect than low GI diet.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

According to body weight status of participants, the investigators considered a slight calorie restriction ranged from 200 to 300 Kcal/d. Planed meals and exchange list prescribed for all volunteers. Dietary records forms were given to all subjects and they were educated how to record their dietary intakes. The investigators asked subjects not to change their physical activity level during the study and monitored them for their physical activity level by 3 days physical activity records monthly.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diabetic nephropathy, medication stable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • poor adherence of dietary recommendations, any changes in kind or dosage of medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: low GI
low GI: participants were asked to consume low GI foods (GI<55) in abundant, medium GI in moderate and high GI (GI>70) rarely.
All diets were designed with similar macronutrients content (30% fat, 0.8 g/kg/d protein and remained calorie requirement by carbohydrate). Additionally, we controlled phosphorus, sodium and potassium content of diets for three intervention groups. All dietary menus had less than 1500 mg phosphor and less than 2400 mg sodium and 2000 mg potassium.
Experimental: low GL
low GL: participants were asked to consume low GI foods and the amount of carbohydrate was controlled.
All diets were designed with similar macronutrients content (30% fat, 0.8 g/kg/d protein and remained calorie requirement by carbohydrate). Additionally, we controlled phosphorus, sodium and potassium content of diets for three intervention groups. All dietary menus had less than 1500 mg phosphor and less than 2400 mg sodium and 2000 mg potassium.
Experimental: conventional diet
conventional diet: all carbohydrate were treated as the same.
All diets were designed with similar macronutrients content (30% fat, 0.8 g/kg/d protein and remained calorie requirement by carbohydrate). Additionally, we controlled phosphorus, sodium and potassium content of diets for three intervention groups. All dietary menus had less than 1500 mg phosphor and less than 2400 mg sodium and 2000 mg potassium.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Serum creatinine (and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (mg/dL) were measured by colorimetric method and enzymatic colorimetric method using commercial assay kit.
Time Frame: baseline, wk 12
baseline, wk 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Serum levels of high sensitive C- reactive protein (hs-CRP) (mg/L) were quantified by using an ultrasensitive latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (Randox Laboratory Ltd., Belfast, United Kingdom).
Time Frame: baseline, wk 12
baseline, wk 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Fasting blood sugar (FBS) and lipid profile concentrations (mg/dl) were measured using commercially available enzymatic reagents adopted to an auto-analyzer system.
Time Frame: baseline, wk 12
baseline, wk 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Nephropathy

Clinical Trials on low GI

Subscribe