Temperature Control With an Esophageal Cooling Device in Post Cardiac Arrest Patients (E-Chill)

July 26, 2018 updated by: Lawson Health Research Institute

Temperature Control With an Esophageal Cooling Device: A Feasibility Study in Post Cardiac Arrest Patients

This is a prospective, interventional study aiming to assess the effectiveness of the Esophageal Cooling Device (ECD) as a temperature control modality in post cardiac arrest patients. In addition, observed adverse events during ECD use, ease-of-use, nurse satisfaction and patient outcomes will be examined.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Temperature control in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest, is a critical aspect of these patients' care. In this context, mild temperature reduction for 24 hours post cardiac arrest has been shown to improve neurological outcomes.

Hypothermia is commonly induced using a combination of internal and external cooling modalities. Internal cooling modalities include intravenous administration of cold crystalloids and intravascular cooling catheters. External or body surface cooling can be achieved using cooling blankets, adhesive pads, and ice packs. Each of these methods however, has its limitations.

Administration of intravenous refrigerated crystalloid (4°C) boluses is a simple, effective and widely available method of hypothermia induction. Lack of precise temperature control and the potential for pulmonary edema however, make this modality unsuitable for the maintenance phase of hypothermia. Surface cooling methods, such as cooling blankets and ice packs, often cause shivering, skin breakdown, and in obese patients may be ineffective. Intravascular cooling catheters require the time of a physician for insertion and bear the potential risks of line infection and deep venous thrombosis. Searching for a temperature control device that overcomes the limitations, inefficiencies and inconveniences of existing modalities is therefore strongly desired.

The ideal temperature control modality should be effective, predictable and easy to use. An esophageal cooling device has recently become available which in theory may, may possess some of these attributes. To date, there have been no published studies examining this device's efficacy. In addition, no study has documented any adverse events during it's use, or evaluated it's ease-of-use at the bedside.

This is a prospective, interventional study aiming to assess the effectiveness of the Esophageal Cooling Device (ECD) as a temperature control modality in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest (the E-Chill trial). In addition, observed adverse events during ECD use, ease-of-use, nurse satisfaction and patient outcomes will be examined.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
        • University Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • Victoria Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted to the intensive care unit after resuscitation from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
  • Sustained return of spontaneous circulation (no chest compressions required for >20 minutes)
  • Not obeying commands to verbal instruction.
  • On mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube or tracheotomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known esophageal deformity (known esophageal varices, history of esophagectomy, previous swallowing disorders, achalasia, etc.) or evidence of esophageal trauma.
  • Known ingestion of acidic or caustic poisons within the prior 24 hours.
  • Patients with less than 40 kg of body mass.
  • Patients known to be pregnant.
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy.
  • Documented intracranial hemorrhage.
  • Patients presenting to the intensive care unit with a temperature < 35°C.
  • Time from collapse to return of spontaneous circulation > 45 minutes or unknown.
  • Time from collapse to starting chest compressions > 10 minutes or unknown.
  • Time from collapse to assessment for enrollment > 12 hours.
  • Patients thought to have a very low chance of surviving the next 48 hours as assessed by the research team.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Esophageal temperature control
The Esophageal Cooling Device (ECD) will be inserted and utilized for temperature control for up to 36 hours in this arm. The ECD will be used for all three phases of therapeutic hypothermia; induction, maintenance, and rewarming. Conventional cooling or warming techniques (e.g. cold saline, ice packs, cooling or warming blankets) will still be made available to the treating ICU team to be used at their discretion.

Insertion of the Esophageal Cooling Device (ECD) will take place as described in the product monograph. The ECD will be connected to the heat exchange unit Blanketrol Hyper-Hypothermia System® (Cincinnati Sub-Zero, Cincinnati, OH) and will be used for temperature control for a total of 36 hours. A patient target of 35°C will be set on the heat exchange unit. Once target is attained, it will be maintained for 24 hours. Slow rewarming will then be achieved by increasing the input target by 0.2°C per hour, until a target of 36.6°C is reached.

All temperature data (device, input target, and patient bladder temperature) will be captured automatically using Data Export Software® (Cincinnati Sub-Zero, Cincinnati, OH) on an external laptop connected to the external heat exchange unit.

Other Names:
  • Esophageal Cooling Device®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of time maintained within 0.5°C range of the 35°C input target, in the hypothermia maintenance phase.
Time Frame: Within 36 hours of ECD insertion.
Once patient temperature is within 0.5°C from the 35°C target, the maintenance phase will commence. The amount of time patient temperature is maintained within ± 0.5 from 35°C, as a percentage of the total hypothermia maintenance time (24 hours) will be examined. Confidence intervals for the results will be reported.
Within 36 hours of ECD insertion.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cooling rate in hypothermia induction phase.
Time Frame: Within 10 hours of ECD insertion.
Average rate of temperature drop during the hypothermia induction phase. The induction phase ends once the patient temperature is within ± 0.5 from the 35°C target. Confidence intervals for the results will be reported.
Within 10 hours of ECD insertion.
Percent of time patient temperature is within 0.5°C range of the input target, 30 minutes after each target elevation in the rewarming phase.
Time Frame: Within 36 hours of ECD insertion.
Rewarming time will be considered to start, 30 minutes after the input target is increased from 35 to 35.2°C. Since patient temperature is likely to change slowly after that change, the recorded temperature taken 30 minutes after the target change will be used. Therefore if the target temperature is changed to 35.2°C at noon, the patient temperature recorded at 12:30 will be used. Whether or not the patient is within ± 0.5 from the 35.2°C target will be calculated using the patient temperatures recorded at 12:30 till the next change in target temperature. And for each subsequent elevation in target, this same rule will be applied. This calculation will be taken to reflect the degree of control over rewarming. Confidence intervals for the results will be reported.
Within 36 hours of ECD insertion.
ECD insertion time.
Time Frame: Within 4 hours of enrollment.
Time taken to insert the Esophageal Cooling Device (ECD) will be measured. This will only include time needed to insert the ECD orally and advance it to the appropriate depth. This will exclude the steps prior to insertion (measuring the appropriate depth of insertion externally, connecting the ECD to the external heat exchange unit, and lubing the tip of the ECD). Taping the ECD in place will be excluded from this time recording as well.
Within 4 hours of enrollment.
Adverse events during and after ECD use.
Time Frame: Within 4 weeks of enrollment or until hospital discharge whichever comes first.
Recorded events during or after ECD use: cardiac arrhythmias, bradycardias, myocardial infarction/re-infarction, ventilator associated pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding (any), esophageal injury, dysphagia, odynophagia, aspiration pneumonia, non-aspiration pneumonia, tube feed intolerance, reflux and evidence of esophagitis.
Within 4 weeks of enrollment or until hospital discharge whichever comes first.
Ease-of-use.
Time Frame: Within 40 hours of enrollment.

Nurses taking care of patients with the device will be asked to rate the following:

I. Observed ease of insertion of device 1 = poor, 3 = average, 5 = excellent. II. General ease-of-use and handling: 1 = poor, 3 = average, 5 = excellent. III. How the ECD compares to our standard methods of inducing hypothermia: 1 = inferior, 3 = equivalent, 5 = superior.

IV. Since ECD insertion, have any other cooling modality been used to cool or warm the patient? If yes, please specify.

Within 40 hours of enrollment.
Patient neurological outcome as defined by the Cerebral Performance Category.
Time Frame: Within 4 weeks of enrollement or until hospital discharge whichever comes earlier.

Patient neurological outcome will be dichotomized into good or bad. Good outcome will be equivalent to CPC scores of 1 & 2 (where the patient is independent), and bad outcome will be equivalent to CPC scores of 3, 4 & 5 (where the patient is either dependent or dead).

CPC Scale:

  1. Functioning normally and independent, possibly with a minor disability.
  2. Moderately disabled, still independent.
  3. Conscious but with a severe disability, dependent.
  4. Unconscious (comatose or in a persistent vegetative state).
  5. Brain dead or dead by traditional criteria.
Within 4 weeks of enrollement or until hospital discharge whichever comes earlier.
Need for other cooling or warming modalities during ECD use.
Time Frame: Within 36 hours of ECD insertion.

The requirement for any of the following cooling modalities during ECD use will be documented.

  1. Intravenous refrigerated saline. Data collected: times of use, volumes administered, and reasons for use as per bedside nurse.
  2. Cooling or warming blanket use. Data collected: times of use, duration of application, and reason for use as per bedside nurse.
  3. Ice-pack application. Data collected: time of use, body location(s) applied, duration of application, and reason for application as per bedside nurse.
  4. Body cavity cold fluid irrigation e.g. bladder, peritoneal... etc. Data collected: time of use, body cavity site, reason for use as per bedside nurse.
Within 36 hours of ECD insertion.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shivering during ECD use.
Time Frame: Within 36 hours of ECD insertion.
The development of shivering in patients not receiving neuromuscular blockade during ECD use will be examined. This will not be evaluated however, in patients receiving neuromuscular blockade as part of their hypothermia protocol.
Within 36 hours of ECD insertion.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ahmed F. Hegazy, MBBCh, FRCPC, Western Univeristy, Canada

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on Esophageal temperature control

Subscribe