High Radiofrequency Power for Faster and Safer Pulmonary Veins Isolation - a Pilot Observational Study. (POWER_FAST)

September 7, 2021 updated by: Dr. Sergio Castrejón-Castrejón, Hospital Universitario La Paz

Feasibility, Safety and Mid-term Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation by High-power Short-duration Radiofrequency Application: the POWER FAST Pilot Study.

The POWER FAST I pilot study is a unicentric, observational, non-randomized controlled clinical study. In the control group pulmonary veins isolation was performded in consecutive patients with irrigated radiofrequency cateters without contact force-sensing capabilities and using conventional low-power and long-duration radiofrequency parameters (20-30 W, 30-60 s) under continuous intracardiac-echo image and esophageal temperature monitoring. The study group consist of consecutive patients distributed in three succesive subgroups. In the study group radiofrequency ablation was performed using a point-by-point technique with contact-force catheters with different high-power and short-duration parameters:

  • Subgroup 50W: power 50 W, application duration ≤ 30 s, target lesion index: LSI ≥ 5 or Ablation Index ≥ 350 (posterior wall) or ≥400 (anterior wall).
  • Subgroup 60W: power 60 W, application duration 7-10 s, contact force ≥5 g.
  • Subgroup 70W: power 70 W, application duration 9 s, contact force ≥5 g.

The safety endpoint was evaluated with systematic esophageal endoscopy performed <72 h after the index procedure. The efficacy endpoint was evaluated:

  • during the ablation procedure: acute procedural efficacy, firts-pass isolation of ipsilateral pulmonary veins, total radiofrequency and procedural time, acute reconnections and dormant conduction,
  • during the follow-up: any atrial tachycardias documented and longer than 30 s were considered recurrences.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain
        • University Hospital La Paz, Department of Cardiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive and unselected patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consecutive and unselected patients with a class I-IIa indication for ablation of paroxysmal or persistent AF.
  • Informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgical or catheter-based PVI.
  • Stroke or acute coronary syndrome <6 months before ablation.
  • Terminal comorbidities.
  • Frailty, or clinical instability.
  • Absolute contraindication for oral anticoagulation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Conventional ablation (CONTROL GROUP)

Pulmonary veins ablation.

  • Anterior aspect: power 30 W, catheter dragging (30 s per point).
  • Posterior aspect: point-by-point ablation using 30 W/30 s applications. If esophageal temperature measured with two independent esophageal probes exceeded 49 ºC radiofrequency settings were modified to 20 W/ 60 s and the number of radiofrequency applications minimized in areas with esophageal temperature rise.

Al procedures were performed with continuos intracardiac echo image and esophageal temperature monitoring.

Conventional (low-power and long-duration) radiofrequency application.
Two probes were simultaneously used: a deflectable one and a non-deflectable one.
Esophageal endoscopy for acute detection of esophageal thermal lesions <72 hours after ablation.
High-power and short-duration ablation

Pulmonary veins ablation.

  • Subgroup 50W: power 50 W, application duration ≤ 30 s, target lesion index: LSI ≥ 5 or Ablation Index ≥ 350 (posterior wall) or ≥400 (anterior wall).
  • Subgroup 60W: power 60 W, application duration 7-10 s, contact force ≥5 g.
  • Subgroup 70W: power 70 W, application duration 9 s, contact force ≥5 g.

Intracardiac echo was not used. Esophageal temperature probes were used only in 6 patients in the subgroup 50W.

Esophageal endoscopy for acute detection of esophageal thermal lesions <72 hours after ablation.
Experimental (high-power and short-duration) radiofrequency application.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical feasibility (systematic use of the high-power and short-duration technique)
Time Frame: Intraprocedural.
Feasibility of the high-power and short-duration radiofrequency technique.
Intraprocedural.
Incidence of complications
Time Frame: < 72 hours after ablation.
Incidence of esophageal thermal lesiones.
< 72 hours after ablation.
Acute efficacy
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Acute pulmonary veins isolation, first-pass isolation, acute reconnections and dormant conduction.
Intraprocedural
1-year efficacy
Time Frame: One year
Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias >30 seconds
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total radiofrequency time
Time Frame: Intraprocedural
Total radiofrequency time needed for definitive isolation of all pulmonary veins
Intraprocedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Conventional LSI/AI-guided pulmonary veins ablation.

3
Subscribe