Treatment of Intracranial Hypertension of Severe Tramatic Brain Injured Patients. Physiopathologic Effects of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents (THIC Cu)

July 2, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Treatment of Intracranial Hypertension of Severe Tramatic Brain Injured Patients. Physiopathologic Effects of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents. A Controlled Randomized Study Versus Placebo

Severely brain injured patients are at high risk of intracranial hypertension. Among medical treatments (sedatives), neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) are recommended by french but not english speaking societies.

Effects of NMBA are unknown. The present study is designed to compare the effects of NMBA versus placebo in the treatment of intracranial hypertension, and the underlying physiopathologic effects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In case of intracranial hypertension, french neurocritical care society argue for the use of neuromuscular blocking agents before osmotherapy, barbituric coma, hypothermia and craniectomy.

English speaking societies don't sustain this approach. Since then, the use of NMBA remains controversial in case of intracranial hypertension and no study is available.

We propose to study severely brain injured patients presenting with intracranial hypertension and treat them with cisatracurium besilate or placebo.

Our hypothesis is that neuromuscular blockade might act on several parameters:

  • Hemodynamics
  • respiratory parameters, mechanical ventilation and blood gaz analysis
  • cerebral velocities
  • diminished O2 peripheral consumption
  • cerebrospinal diffusion and concentration of cisatracurium and a metabolite laudanosine We wish to assess changes in ICP according to the above parameters in a controlled randomized non blinded fashion against placebo (NaCl 0,9%).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

34

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sophie KAUFFMANN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Age over 18
  • Mechanical ventilation and deep sedation
  • Severe traumatic brain injury
  • Intracranial hypertension (ICP > 20 mmHg during > 15 minutes)
  • Intracranial pressure monitoring
  • Hemodynamically stable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - History of anaphylaxia with neuromuscular agents
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Pregnant and/or breast feeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CISATRACURIUM
To compare the evolution of intracranial pressure (ICP) of severely brain injured patients with intracranial hypertension after administration of cisatracurium versus placebo.
Placebo Comparator: PLACEBO
To compare the evolution of intracranial pressure (ICP) of severely brain injured patients with intracranial hypertension after administration of cisatracurium versus placebo.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
area under the curve of the temporal evolution of intracranial pressure
Time Frame: at day 1
The primary outcome is the area under the curve of the temporal evolution of intracranial pressure, over a period of 30 minutes after the administration of neuromuscular blocking agent or placebo.
at day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Course of intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures and various cerebral monitoring data if available (SvjO2, PtiO2)
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
Monitoring of the time spent by intracranial pressure above 20 mmHg using continuous recording
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
Course of intracranial pressure based on the type of brain injury
Time Frame: at day 1
diffuse axonal injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hematoma)
at day 1
Monitoring of the curare effect
Time Frame: at day 1
train of four and PTC
at day 1
Course of ventilation parameters
Time Frame: at day 1
tidal volume, FiO2, PEEP
at day 1
Course of transcranial Doppler data
Time Frame: at day 1
velocities
at day 1
Course of arterial blood gas data
Time Frame: at day 1
pH, paO2, paCO2, Excess Base, HCO3-
at day 1
Course of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of cistracurium and laudanosine
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of cisatracurium and laudanosin in case of cerebrospinal fluid derivation
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
Occurrence of cardiovascular complications
Time Frame: at day 1
hypotension, myocardial ischemia
at day 1
Occurrence of pulmonary complications
Time Frame: at day 1
acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation
at day 1
Occurrence of renal complications
Time Frame: at day 1
use of renal replacement therapy
at day 1
Occurrence of infectious complications
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
Doses of vasopressors or catecholamines
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
Need to increase therapeutics
Time Frame: at day 1
barbiturate coma, hypothermia, osmotherapy, decompressive craniectomy
at day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 19, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 19, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe