Utility of an Animated Bowel Biofeedback Training Routine to Improve Bowel Function in Individuals With SCI

Bowel Biofeedback Training to Improve Bowel Function in Individuals With SCI

An injury to the spinal cord results in a number of secondary medical problems, including the inability to voluntarily control the bowels. Depending on the severity and location of the injury, remaining bowel function differs, and can include any combination of the following: constipation (prolonged stool retention), difficulty with evacuation (difficultly moving bowels), fecal incontinence (problems retaining stool until it is appropriate to move the bowels). Most of the current medications and treatment options address problems of constipation and difficulty with evacuation, but there are few options for individuals who suffer from incontinency. In this study, the investigators propose to study, in detail, anorectal muscle function in individuals with spinal injury - the investigators will do so using new technology called high resolution manometry - which will present the investigator with a 3 dimensional representation of the pressure profile of the anorectal muscles as the subject attempts different maneuvers. A subgroup with representatives of all levels and completeness of injury and anorectal muscle function will be enrolled to participate in six weeks of biofeedback training to see if their bowel function can be improved. During these six weeks, the subjects will be asked to visit the laboratory twice a week in order to be trained by the research team on how to improve their anorectal strength and function in response to visual cues. After the six weeks, another manometry study will be performed. Subjects will then be sent home and asked to perform a series of home exercises for another 6 weeks, after which they will asked to return for a third and final manometry study.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Constipation; Neurogenic Bowel; Fecal Incontinence; Spinal Cord Injury
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Anorectal Manometry; Behavioral: Bowel Biofeedback

Detailed Description

Neurogenic bowel characteristics differ among spinal cord injured (SCI) individuals, and appear to depend primarily on the level and completeness of injury. It is thought that upper motor neuron lesions in the spinal cord above L1-2 results in a hyperreflexive bowel with increased colonic wall tone and loss of cortical control over the relaxation of the external anal sphincter (EAS). These changes result in chronic high sphincter tone and dyssynergic defecation. The main symptoms in these patients are constipation and fecal retention, or difficulty with evacuation (DWE). In many of these individuals, some nerve connections between the spinal cord and the colon may be preserved, and stool propulsion and reflex coordination may remain intact and under control of the central nervous system. Furthermore, individuals with spinal lesions above T7 experience loss of voluntary control over abdominal muscles and an inability to increase intra-abdominal pressure, which results in more DWE and constipation. Lower motor neuron (LMN) lesions in the spinal cord below L1-2 result in the interruption of the centrally mediated innervation to the bowel, which causes slowing of peristalsis, a flaccid EAS, and atonic levator ani muscles. This is also called an areflexic bowel. The main symptoms in these patients are constipation from slowed peristalsis and fecal incontinence (FI) from atonic EAS and levator ani muscles. While the symptoms of bowel dysfunction in persons with SCI are known, function and motility of the anal canal have not been documented in this population. Anorectal manometry can provide valuable information about sphincter strength, defecation dynamics and reflex mechanisms. New high-resolution anorectal manometric systems (Given Imaging, Duluth, GA), simultaneously captures pressure data from the rectum, IAS, EAS and atmosphere. High resolution manometry also allows for much clearer display of pressure events compared to line tracing series, and direction of contractions are much easier to discern. To date, anorectal high resolution topographical studies have not been conducted in a SCI population.

Modalities in which the patient can be trained to control the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and EAS are promising solutions to FI, and have been shown to be useful in able bodied (AB) populations. For example, anorectal biofeedback methods teach patients to recognize sensations of a distended rectum while also teaching abdominal or pelvic muscles to voluntarily contract for short periods of time in order to improve continence. Such biofeedback modalities have also been shown to decrease constipation in AB populations by teaching proper external sphincter relaxation and rectal muscle contraction. The concept of biofeedback is based on principles of operant conditioning, in which information concerning a normally subconscious physiological function in relayed to patients and that become actively engaged in learning to consciously control this function. During bowel (re)training programs, patients are provided with visual feedback on voluntary and reflex sphincter and rectal muscle contractions, so that they can learn to recognize diffuse sensations and gradually regain control.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 50
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • New York
    • Bronx, New York, United States, 10468
      • James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Chronic SCI (duration over 1 year)
• Able-bodied (no SCI)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Contraindication to bowel biofeedback
• Currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant
• Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Non-Randomized
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Anorectal Manometry; Part 1 [Anorectal Manometry]: Fifty SCI subjects and 15 AB subjects will undergo anorectal manometry and a baseline assessment of level of constipation or frequency of fecal incontinence (FI). Additional 10 able-bodied subjects will be enrolled to serve as controls. The 10 Question Bowel Survey and Incontinence Scale will be administered.	Behavioral: Anorectal Manometry; Subjects will undergo an anorectal manometry to establish baseline pressure characteristics. If subjects qualify for biofeedback training, they will complete two additional manometries to track the changes occuring during training.
Experimental: Bowel Biofeedback Training; Part 2 [Bowel Biofeedback]: A subgroup of 20 subjects who participated in the first arm of the study (Anorectal Motility) and report either constipation or fecal incontinence will be asked to participate in 12 weeks of twice weekly, biofeedback training. The biofeedback training will consist of in-lab exercises that are paired with a visual feedback. Anorectal manometry and bowel surveys will be repeated after the training session to assess the effects of bowel biofeedback on anorectal function.	Behavioral: Bowel Biofeedback; Subjects will complete 2 sessions twice a week for 6 weeks of bowel biofeedback training. Subjects will be asked to squeeze and bear down for a period of 5 seconds followed by rest for 10seconds. Following the training, each subject will complete similar training at home for 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Baseline Motility (Anorectal Sensation and Strength) Characteristics	We aim to assess the following baseline motility characteristics: maximum sphincter pressure (resting and squeezing pressure), mean sphincter pressure, residual anal and intrarectal pressure (high pressure zone), and recto-anal pressure differential (difference of intrarectal and residual anal pressures) in persons with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and able bodied (AB) subjects.	1 Session (Baseline Anorectal Manometry Assessment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Rectal and Sphincter Pressure Due to Bowel Biofeedback Training in Individuals With Incomplete SCI.	Changes in maximum rectal and sphincter pressures generated during "squeeze" and "bear down" maneuvers performed during anorectal manometric studies pre-biofeedback training (baseline) and post-guided (part 1) and self-guided (part 2) biofeedback training.	Baseline, post- 6 week guided biofeedback training (weeks 1-6), post- 6 week self-guided biofeedback training (weeks 7-12).
Changes in Recto-anal Inhibitory Reflex (RAIR) Due to Bowel Biofeedback Training in Individuals With Incomplete SCI.	Changes to the sensitivity and strength of response of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) in response to rectal distension. Outcome measure clarification: Minimal balloon volume, in cc, which was the threshold at which anorectal sensation was perceived by subjects with incomplete SCI, as assessed through High Resolution Manometry (HRM)	Baseline, post- 6 week guided biofeedback training (weeks 1-6), post- 6 week self-guided biofeedback training (weeks 7-12).
Change in Subjective Bowel Care Due to Guided and Self-Guided Biofeedback Training in Individuals With Incomplete SCI	Constipation and fecal Incontinence was assessed in participants with incomplete SCI by the Ten Question Bowel Survey. This survey is based on a scale 1-5; a lower score represents fewer bowel management difficulties (better functioning). Survey was administered at baseline (pre-training), and post- guided (part 1) and self-guided (part 2) bowel biofeedback training.	Baseline, post- 6 week guided biofeedback training (weeks 1-6), post- 6 week self-guided biofeedback training (weeks 7-12).

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: VA Office of Research and Development
• Collaborators: James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Mark A Korsten, MD, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 1, 2013
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 30, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): December 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 19, 2015
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 30, 2015
• First Posted (Estimate): April 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): September 17, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 20, 2021
• Last Verified: August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Constipation; Spinal Cord Injury; Neurogenic Bowel; Manometry; Fecal Incontinence; Bowel Biofeedback
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Digestive System Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Wounds and Injuries; Signs and Symptoms, Digestive; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Colonic Diseases, Functional; Colonic Diseases; Intestinal Diseases; Rectal Diseases; Trauma, Nervous System; Spinal Cord Diseases; Constipation; Spinal Cord Injuries; Neurogenic Bowel; Fecal Incontinence
• Other Study ID Numbers: B1915-P; KOR-13-010 (Other Identifier: James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No