- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02426086
Study to Evaluate Activity of 2 Dose Levels of Imetelstat in Participants With Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Previously Treated With Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor
August 17, 2021 updated by: Geron Corporation
A Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Activity of 2 Dose Levels of Imetelstat in Subjects With Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Relapsed/Refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or is refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment.
Key secondary endpoint includes overall survival.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), multicenter (more than one hospital, medical school team or medical clinic work on a medical research study) study of 2 dosing regimens (treatment arms) of single-agent imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment.
The main study consists of 3 parts: Screening Phase (21 days before randomization); Treatment Phase (from randomization until study drug discontinuation); and Follow up Phase (until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent or study end, whichever occurs first).
Participants received imetelstat 9.4 milligram (mg)/kilogram (kg) intravenously (IV) for every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end OR imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg IV for every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.
Initially, all participants were blinded to the treatment.
After the first interim analysis, treatment for all participants was unblinded and participants assigned to the imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg arm could continue with their same imetelstat dose or have it increased to 9.4 mg/kg at the investigator's discretion.
The percentage of spleen response and symptom response were evaluated as co-primary endpoints.
Following completion of the primary analysis, participants benefiting from study treatment could continue to receive imetelstat in Extension phase for up to 2 years or until loss of benefit or unacceptable toxicity.
Participants who had already stopped study treatment could enter the Extension phase to continue follow up for safety via serious adverse event collection and for survival status.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
107
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antwerpen, Belgium
-
Brugge, Belgium
-
Brussel, Belgium
-
Leuven, Belgium
-
-
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
-
-
Manitoba
-
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
-
-
-
-
-
Angers, France
-
Lille, France
-
Marseille Cedex 9, France
-
Paris, France
-
Pierre Benite, France
-
Toulouse cedex 9, France
-
-
-
-
-
Aachen, Germany
-
Dresden, Germany
-
Duesseldorf, Germany
-
Frankfurt, Germany
-
Hamburg, Germany
-
Heidelberg, Germany
-
Koeln, Germany
-
Leipzig, Germany
-
Mannheim, Germany
-
Rostock, Germany
-
-
-
-
-
Haifa, Israel
-
Jerusalem, Israel
-
Kfar Saba, Israel
-
Nahariya, Israel
-
Ramat Gan, Israel
-
Tel Aviv, Israel
-
-
-
-
-
Bergamo, Italy
-
Bologna, Italy
-
-
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain
-
Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, Spain
-
Madrid, Spain
-
Salamanca, Spain
-
Valencia, Spain
-
-
-
-
-
Chiayi City, Taiwan
-
Taipei, Taiwan
-
-
-
-
-
Birmingham, United Kingdom
-
Glasgow, United Kingdom
-
London, United Kingdom
-
Oxford, United Kingdom
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
-
-
California
-
Duarte, California, United States
-
La Jolla, California, United States
-
Los Angeles, California, United States
-
Stanford, California, United States
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, United States
-
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States
-
Buffalo, New York, United States
-
Lake Success, New York, United States
-
New York, New York, United States
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
-
-
South Carolina
-
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
-
-
South Dakota
-
Watertown, South Dakota, United States
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) according to the revised WHO criteria; or post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis (PET-MF) or post-polycythemia vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) according to the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria.
- Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-2 or highrisk MF.
- Measurable splenomegaly prior to study entry as demonstrated by palpable spleen measuring ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin OR spleen volume of ≥ 450 cm^3 measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Active symptoms of MF as demonstrated by a symptom score of at least 5 points (on a 0 to 10 scale) on at least one of the symptoms or a score of 3 or greater on at least 2 of the symptoms.
- Documented progressive disease during or after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Peripheral blood blast count of ≥ 10% or bone marrow blast count of ≥ 10%.
- Prior treatment with imetelstat.
- Any chemotherapy or MF-directed therapy, investigational drug, hydroxyurea, immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy, corticosteroids or JAK inhibitor therapy ≤14 days prior to randomization.
- Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
- Active systemic hepatitis infection requiring treatment (carriers of hepatitis virus are permitted to enter the study), of any type or known acute or chronic liver disease including cirrhosis.
- Prior history of hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg
|
Participants received imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Study drug was administered intravenously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.
|
|
Experimental: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
|
Participants received imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response
Time Frame: Week 24
|
Spleen response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at Week 24 from baseline performed by the IRC using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
|
Week 24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Symptom Response
Time Frame: Week 24
|
Symptom response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 from baseline as measured by the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 2.0 diary.
The MFSAF assessed following symptoms due to Myelofibrosis (MF): night sweats, itchiness, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, feeling of fullness, bone or muscle pain and degree of inactivity.
Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and greater inactivity.
The total score ranges from 0-70, where 0 indicates absent/as good as it can be and 70 indicates worst imaginable/as bad as it can be.
|
Week 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria
Time Frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
Overall Response Rate: % of participants with complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) per modified IWG-MRT.CR: bone marrow: normocellular <5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in peripheral blood (PB):<2%;hemoglobin (Hb):10 g/dL-upper limit of normal (ULN); neutrophils:1*10^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100*10^9/L-ULN; spleen:not palpable and ≤350ml volume; extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH): no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: >70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS.
PR: bone marrow: normocellular: <5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: <2%; Hb: 8.5 -<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1*10^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -<100*10^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH;symptoms: >50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS.
All response categories, benefit must last >12 weeks to qualify as response.
|
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Time Frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
CI per the modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia (Increase in severity of anemia constitutes the occurrence of new transfusion dependency or a ≥ 2.0 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from pretreatment baseline that lasts for at least 12 weeks.
Increase in severity of thrombocytopenia or neutropenia is defined as a 2-grade decline, from pretreatment baseline, in platelet count or ANC, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03.
In addition, assignment to CI requires a minimum platelet count of ≥ 25,000*10^9/L and ANC of ≥ 0.5*10^9/L.)
For all response categories, benefit must last for >12 weeks to qualify as a response.
|
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT
Time Frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
Clinical response rate (CRR) was defined as percentage of participants who achieved CR, PR, or CI per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria.
CR: bone marrow: normocellular <5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in PB: <2%; Hb: 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1*10^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100*10^9/L-ULN; spleen: not palpable and ≤350ml volume; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: >70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS.
PR: bone marrow: normocellular: <5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: <2%; Hb: 8.5 -<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1*10^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -<100*10^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: >50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS.
CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
|
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Time Frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
Spleen response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria.
Spleen response: a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at 5-10 cm, below the left costal margin (LCM), becomes not palpable or a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at >10 cm, below the LCM, decreases by ≥50%; A spleen response requires confirmation by MRI showing >35% spleen volume reduction (SVR).
For response categories, benefit must last for >12 weeks to qualify as a response.
Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement.
Participants who met criteria for spleen response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement.
The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
|
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Time Frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
Symptoms response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria.
Symptoms Response: a ≥50% reduction in the modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS.
For response category, benefit must last for >12 weeks to qualify as a response.
Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement.
Participants who met criteria for symptom response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement.
The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
|
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Time Frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
Anemia response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria.
Anemia response is defined as participants with baseline Hb <10 g/dL but not meeting strict criteria for transfusion dependency: a ≥ 2 g/dL increase in Hb; Transfusion dependent participants at baseline: becoming transfusion independent.
Transfusion independence is defined as absence of any pRBC transfusions for at least 12 "rolling" weeks.
For response categories, benefit must last for >12 weeks to qualify as a response.
Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement.
Participants who met criteria for anemia response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement.
The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
|
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
|
Duration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT Criteria
Time Frame: From date of initial documentation of a response to the date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
Duration of response (PR/CI/RWCI) is the duration from the date of initial documentation of a response to date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first.
PR: BM: normocellular: <5% blasts ≤Grade 1 fibrosis/not meeting BM remission criteria; IMC in PB: <2%; Hb: 8.5 -<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL- ULN; neutrophils: 1*10^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -<100*10^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI/not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: >50% improvement in symptom score.
CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia.
RWCI: Participants who met criteria for response but had worsening cytopenias.
PD: Splenomegaly requires MRI showing ≥25% increase in spleen volume.
|
From date of initial documentation of a response to the date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
|
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days), up to the date of the participant's death (approximately up to 4.1 years)
|
Overall Survival is measured from the date of Cycle 1, Day 1 to the date of the participants death.
If the participant's was alive or the vital status was unknown, OS was censored at the date that the participant is last known to be alive.
|
Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days), up to the date of the participant's death (approximately up to 4.1 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health Status
Time Frame: Up to end of the treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients.
The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 items resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) which are based on 4-point scale (1= Not at all to 4= Very much); and 1 global health status scale based on 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7= Excellent).
All scales and items are averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning.
Clinically meaningful improvement defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status.
|
Up to end of the treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
|
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years
|
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal.
EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and VAS.
EQ-5D health state profile comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems.
The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state.
EQ-5D-5L- VAS is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.
|
At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: Up to end of treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
The BPI rates the intensity of pain on 4 items (right now, worst, least, and average), and the interference in 7 areas (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations, sleep, enjoyment of life).
Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 10.
Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity/worse outcomes.
Clinically meaningful improvement in BPI defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline.
|
Up to end of treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)
|
|
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years
|
The PGIC was used to capture the participant's perspective of improvement or decline in MF symptoms over time.
The PGIC had a 7-point response scale ranging from 1 to 7 where, (1=very much improved, 2= somewhat improved, 3= a little improved, 4=no change, 5= a little worse, 6= somewhat worse, 7=very much worse).
|
At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Up to end of extension phase (approximately up to 4.2 years)
|
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
TEAEs were AEs with onset during or after the first dose of study drug, and within 30 days following the last dose of study drug.
|
Up to end of extension phase (approximately up to 4.2 years)
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat
Time Frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat
Time Frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat
Time Frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat
Time Frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
|
|
Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat
Time Frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
Elimination half-life (t 1/2) is associated with the terminal slope (lambda [z]) of the semi logarithmic drug concentration-time curve, calculated as 0.693/lambda(z).
|
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
|
Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat
Time Frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
|
|
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat
Time Frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Study Clinical Team, Geron Corporation
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 28, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 26, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
February 7, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
April 24, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 14, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 17, 2021
Last Verified
August 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Bone Marrow Diseases
- Hematologic Diseases
- Myeloproliferative Disorders
- Primary Myelofibrosis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Micronutrients
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Vitamins
- Vitamin B Complex
- Niacinamide
- Imetelstat
- Motesanib diphosphate
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR107170
- 63935937MYF2001 (Other Identifier: Geron Corporation)
- 2015-000946-41 (EudraCT Number)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Myelofibrosis
-
MPN Research FoundationMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; GlaxoSmithKline; Karyopharm Therapeutics... and other collaboratorsRecruitingMyeloproliferative Disorders | Polycythemia Vera | Thrombocythemia, Essential | Myelofibrosis | Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis | Myeloproliferative Neoplasm(MPN)-Associated Myelofibrosis | Myeloproliferative Disorder | Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) | Myeloproliferative Neoplasms | Myelofibrosis (MF) | Secondary Myelofibrosis and other conditionsUnited States
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterUnknownMyelofibrosis, Primary | Myelofibrosis, Post PV | Myelofibrosis, Post ETIsrael
-
SWOG Cancer Research NetworkGlaxoSmithKlineNot yet recruitingMyelofibrosis | Myelofibrosis (MF)
-
University of California, IrvineRecruitingMyelofibrosis | Myelofibrosis; AnemiaUnited States
-
John MascarenhasNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc; Sobi, Inc.Not yet recruitingMyelofibrosis | Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis | Post-essential Thrombocythemia MyelofibrosisUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Annecy GenevoisCompleted
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingPrimary Myelofibrosis (PMF) | Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) | Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (PET-MF)United States, South Korea, Switzerland
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingPrimary Myelofibrosis (PMF) | Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (Post-PV MF) | Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (Post-ET MF)Japan
-
The University of Hong KongRecruitingMyelofibrosis | Primary Myelofibrosis, Prefibrotic StageHong Kong
-
AbbVieActive, not recruitingMyelofibrosis (MF)United States, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Hungary, Israel, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, Korea, Republic of, Italy
Clinical Trials on Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg
-
Geron CorporationCompletedMultiple MyelomaUnited States
-
Keymed Biosciences Co.LtdNot yet recruitingSystemic Lupus Erythematosus
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedMuscular DystrophiesFrance, United States
-
Healthgen Biotechnology Corp.RecruitingEmphysema Secondary to Congenital AATDUnited States
-
Gangnam Severance HospitalCompleted
-
Hoag Memorial Hospital PresbyterianDa Zen Theranostics IncEnrolling by invitationPancreatic Cancer | Metastatic Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
Aileron Therapeutics, Inc.Completed
-
Crucell Holland BVNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Completed
-
MedImmune LLCCompletedHealthy SubjectsUnited States
-
Sichuan Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., LtdThe First Hospital of Jilin UniversityCompletedHealthy Elderly SubjectsChina