Better Together: an Online Physician Coaching Program for Medical Trainees

April 7, 2023 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

Effect of a Novel Online Physician Group-Coaching Program to Reduce Burnout in Trainees: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a single-institution randomized controlled trial. 101 female residents were recurited from the University of Colorado School of Medicine. They enrolled beginning in January 2021 and participated in the coaching program for 6 months via a web-based system. Participants were randomized into either the intervention or wait-list control arm. Participants in the intervention arm began the 6-month coaching program in January, 2021. Participants in the wait-list control arm have received no additional resources from the Better Together program between January and June 2021. The wait-list control group was invited to begin the 6-month coaching program in July 2021. In December 2021, participants from both the intervention and wait-list control groups will be invited to complete a 2nd post survey (identical to the post-survey from June 2021). There will be no incentive for completion of the 2nd post survey. Finally, the longitudinal effect of the program will be assessed by offering the same survey measuring wellbeing via various indices to the intervention arm at 6 months (1/2022), 12 months (7/2022) and 18 months (1/2023) after their intervention. Participation in this survey will be completely voluntary and not incentivized/compensated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Positive psychology coaching programs demonstrate efficacy in reducing emotional exhaustion (a construct of burnout) and improving coping skills among residents but rely on substantial faculty development and coordination for participants. Considering the disproportionate burnout risk faced by women trainees in medicine, novel strategies to mitigate this risk is needed. Among a national sample of resident physicians, 60% screen positive for burnout. Compared to age-matched peers, residents are significantly more likely to experience burnout and have burnout persist into early careers. Female trainees are particularly vulnerable, with long-term consequences affecting professional development and success. Disproportionate burnout among women may be a contributor to the "leaky pipeline" in academic medicine, where women start their careers as 46% of the resident workforce yet represent only 25% of full professors and 18% of department chairs. Social connectedness and the practice of self-compassion are important intervention in reducing burnout and increasing resilience among residents. Positive psychology coaching programs have specifically had demonstrated efficacy in faculty and residents. Web-based group coaching programs have not been assessed for their potential to reduce burnout and improve resilience and well-being among trainees.

A. Outcome Measure(s):

  1. participation (administrative data)
  2. participant experience and reflection (interview)
  3. measures of burnout and self-compassion as measured on a pre- and post- program survey including the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and Neff Self Compassion Score (SCS). Semi structured qualitative interviews will be led by a PRA upon completion of the 6-month pilot. The interview script will include questions about program content, participant experience, coping skills, interpersonal connectedness, personal and professional satisfaction, and general reflections.

Description of Population to be Enrolled:

This pilot study recruited individuals from the University of Colorado graduate medical education training programs. The pilot program is limited to female trainees who have greater than 1 year of training left in order to give trainees time to complete the program prior to graduation. Enrollment in the program is entirely voluntary and trainees can cease enrollment at any time.

Study Design and Research Methods:

This is a single-institution randomized controlled trial. 101 female residents were recruited from the University of Colorado School of Medicine. They enrolled beginning in January 2021 and participated in the coaching program for 6 months via a web-based system. The website is secure and only available for program participants. There are monthly modules with asynchronous, self-directed delivery, designed to mitigate the time constraints and faculty development required of traditional in-person coaching. Video recordings of group-coaching calls will be made available to the program participants via the secure website with the intent to allow participants to benefit from group coaching even if they aren't able to attend the calls live. These recordings do contain PHI of participants.

101 women trainees from 12 ACGME training programs enrolled in the program. Participants were randomized into either the intervention or wait-list control arm. Participants in the intervention arm began the 6-month coaching program in January, 2021. Participants in the wait-list control arm have received no additional resources from the Better Together program between January and June 2021.

All participants in both intervention and wait-list control groups will be invited to complete the quantitative post-program survey in June 2021. At the time of the post-program survey in 6/2021, the wait-list control group will not have received the coaching intervention. Following the quantitative and qualitative data collection, the control group was be offered the 6-month coaching program from July-December 2021.

The wait-list control group was invited to begin the 6-month coaching program in July 2021. In December 2021, participants from both the intervention and wait-list control groups will be invited to complete a 2nd post survey (identical to the post-survey from June 2021). There will be no incentive for completion of the 2nd post survey.

Finally, the longitudinal effect of the program will be assessed by offering the same survey measuring wellbeing via various indices to the intervention arm at 6 months (1/2022), 12 months (7/2022) and 18 months (1/2023) after their intervention. Participation in this survey will be completely voluntary and not incentivized/compensated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80230
        • University of Colorado School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • graduate medical education trainees (residents and fellows) at the University of Colorado
  • Female identifying

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non trainees
  • non- female identifying

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Enrolled into a 6 month coaching program from January 1 2021 to June 30 2021
6 month, online group coaching program
No Intervention: Control/Wait-list
No intervention from January 1 2021 to July 1 2021 (they were offered the coaching program from July 1 2021-Dec 31 2021)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Burnout at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline measurement, post-intervention measurements at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
The Maslach's burnout inventory is a 22-item measurement of worker burnout which assesses emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and personal fulfillment (PF) domains. Possible scores range from 0-6 on a Likert scale for each item. Scores oof EE ≥ 27 points, DP ≥ 10, and PF <33 would indicate a high degree of burnout. Scores of EE≤18 points, DP≤5 points, and PF≥40 points would indicate a low degree of burnout.
Baseline measurement, post-intervention measurements at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Self Compassion at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline measurement, post-intervention measurements at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Neff's Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form is a 12 item measurement of self-compassion with higher scores indicating improved or better levels of self compassion.
Baseline measurement, post-intervention measurements at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Change from baseline Imposter Syndrome at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline measurement, post-intervention measurements at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
The Young Impostor Syndrome Scale is an 8 item measurement of imposter phenomenon with scores ≥ 5 indicating "yes" to presence of imposter phenomenon and scores less than 5 being negative for presence of imposter phenomenon.
Baseline measurement, post-intervention measurements at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Change from baseline Moral Injury at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline measurement, post-intervention measurements at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
The Moral Injury Symptom Score for healthcare professionals is a 22 item measure of moral injury symptoms that assesses betrayal, guilt, shame, moral concerns, loss of trust, loss of meaning, difficulty forgiving, self-condemnation, religious struggle, and loss of religious/spiritual faith with scores of 60 or higher correlating with extreme problems, scores of 45-59 being moderate and scores of 30-45 being mild.
Baseline measurement, post-intervention measurements at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burnout

Clinical Trials on Better Together Physician Coaching

Subscribe