Effectiveness of Astym Treatment For de Quervain's Tenosynovitis

September 16, 2020 updated by: NYU Langone Health
To determine if the addition of Astym treatment to traditional therapy produces a more positive outcome then traditional therapy alone for the treatment of de Quervain's tenosynvitis. Two groups will be examined with one group receiving traditional therapy and the other group receiving traditional therapy in addition to Astym treatment protocol.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU Langone Medical Center, Center for Musculoskeletal Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

i. Positive Finkelstein's test: The client will report pain over the first compartment of the extensor retinaculum when the thumb is tucked in the hand and deviated ulnarly.

ii. Persistent symptoms for >3 wks which have not resolved after an additional 3 weeks of splinting

iii. A diagnosis by a physician of "de Quervain's", "fist compartment tenosynovitis", or "radial styloid tenosynovitis"

iv. Patients must agree and comply to a predetermined splinting regimen

Exclusion Criteria:

i. History of cortical steroid injection to affected wrist and/or thumb

ii. History of previous wrist trauma to affected limb

iii. Comorbidity such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), radial tunnel syndrome, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, auto-immune disease or inflammatory conditions, lateral epicondylitis or tendinopathies

iv. Clotting deficits

v. Positive Cozen's sign which would indicate intersection syndrome

vi. Post-partum mothers <6 months and pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Occupational therapy
Traditional therapy for de Quervain's Tenosynovitis
Occupational therapy for de Quervain's Tenosynovitis
Experimental: Occupational therapy with ASTYM
Traditional therapy for de Quervain's Tenosynovitis plus ASTYM
Occupational therapy for de Quervain's Tenosynovitis plus ASTYM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale for Pain
Time Frame: 4.5 months
This scale is a single point scale from 0-10. The participant picks one number to represent their pain, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
4.5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment (SODA) Score
Time Frame: 1.5 months
This is a test to measure dexterity and bimanual abilities in activities of daily living. It includes 12 tasks with participants being scored on their ability, difficulty and pain during the task. Scores on the individual tasks are summed, and the range of the total SODA score is 0-108. A higher score indicates a higher dexterity.
1.5 months
Quick Dash Score
Time Frame: 4.5 months
It is a questionnaire that measures an individual's ability to complete tasks, absorb forces, and severity of symptoms. The QuickDASH tool uses a 5-point Likert scale from which the patient can select an appropriate number corresponding to his/her severity level/ function level. QuickDASH Scoring Formula = ([(sum of n responses)/n] -1)(25) where n represents the number of completed items. Higher scores indicate a greater level of disability and severity, whereas, lower scores indicate a lower level of disability. The score on both test ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
4.5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen VanLew, PhD, OTR/L, NYU Langone Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 29, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 29, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on de Quervain's Disease

Clinical Trials on Occupational therapy

3
Subscribe