Efficacy & Safety of STG320 Sublingual Tablets of HDM Allergen Extracts in Adults and Adolescents With HDM-associated AR

September 26, 2019 updated by: Stallergenes Greer

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study of the Efficacy and Safety of STG320 Sublingual Tablets of House Dust Mite (HDM) Allergen Extracts in Adults and Adolescents With HDM-associated Allergic Rhinitis

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 months of treatment with 300 IR of STG320 sublingual tablets compared with placebo in adults and adolescents with HDM-associated allergic rhinitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study with 2 parallel arms in adults and adolescents with HDM-associated allergic rhinitis (AR) for at least one year.

The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of STG320 sublingual tablets at a daily dosage of 300 IR when administered for 12 months to adults and adolescents with HDM-associated AR. The primary efficacy variable was the average Total Combined Score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1607

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33610
        • University of South of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with HDM-associated allergic rhinitis (AR) for at least 1 year
  • Patients sensitized to D. pteronyssinus (D. pte) and/or D. farinae (D. far) defined on skin prick test and HDM-specific serum IgE

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of rhinitis, rhinoconjunctivitis or asthma to allergens other than HDM, likely to result in rhinitis symptoms during the evaluation periods
  • Partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma
  • Controlled asthma requiring controller treatment(s) consistent with GINA 2014 treatment Steps 3 to 5

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo tablet
Placebo tablet
Active Comparator: 300 IR
300 IR tablet of HDM Allergen Extracts
300 IR tablet of HDM Allergen Extracts

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Combined Score
Time Frame: 12 months
Average Total Combined Score (TCS), calculated for each patient as the average of the non-missing daily TCSs during the primary evaluation period. The daily TCS (scale 0-15) was the sum of the patient's daily Rhinitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS, scale 0-12) and daily Rescue Medication Score (RMS, scale 0-3). Lower is better.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Rhinitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS)
Time Frame: 12 months

Average RTSS during the primary evaluation period. The daily Total Symptom Scores (RTSS) was the sum of the 4 rhinitis symptom scores: sneezing, rhinorrhoea, nasal pruritus and nasal congestion, each graded on a 4-point scale (0-3; 0: absent, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe).

It ranges from 0 to 12. Lower is better.

12 months
Average Rescue Medication Score (RMS)
Time Frame: 12 months
Average RMS during the primary evaluation period. Rescue Medication Score (RMS) ; range 0-3, lower is better.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tom Casale, MD, University of South of Florida, Tampa, USA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial

Clinical Trials on 300 IR

3
Subscribe