Nutrition and Energy Restriction for Cancer Prevention (HELENA)

December 27, 2021 updated by: Tilman Kuehn, German Cancer Research Center

Healthy Nutrition and Energy Restriction as Cancer Prevention Strategies: a Randomized Controlled Intervention Trial

This study evaluates the effect of intermittent calorie restriction versus continued calorie restriction on weight loss, gene expression profile of subcutaneous adipose tissue and abdominal fat distribution.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Since obesity has become a major public health concern appropriate strategies are needed in order to reduce obesity-related health risks in later life span. Obesity is one of the main risk factors not only for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, but also for several types of cancer. Several key mechanisms, which may link obesity, metabolic dysregulation and cancer risk, such as obesity-driven inflammation, altered adipokine, growth factor and sex hormone signaling, and changes in the microbiota have been identified.

Various studies have shown that continuous calorie restriction (CCR) and exercise are effective strategies to enforce weight-loss and improve biomarker profiles. Intermittent calorie restriction (ICR) as a novel strategy might induce favorable metabolic changes and lead to higher compliance rates. The concept of this diet regime is very simple e.g. 2 days/week of fasting following a standardized diet covering 25 % of energy needs and 5 days/week of ad libitum consumption. To verify the effectiveness of ICR as an alternative weight loss strategy to CCR controlled intervention trials are required. Although both CCR and ICR induce a negative energy balance, the metabolic effect on human physiology might differ.

Within the HELENA-study 50 non-smoking adults (men and women aged 35 to 65 years) with an BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² and ≤ 40 kg/m² will be randomly assigned to each of the intervention arms: (1) ICR arm (2 day/week fasting, i.e. 25% energy intake, energy intake of 100% on 5 days/week leading to a weekly average energy intake of ~80%) (2) CCR arm (daily energy intake of 80%) and 3) control arm (general advice on healthy nutrition).

The trial will last 1 year, with an intervention phase of 12 weeks (weeks 0-12; intervention; close contact with participants), followed by a maintenance phase (weeks 13-24; maintenance; regular, but less frequent contact with participants) and a follow-up phase (weeks 25-52).

Biological specimens will be collected as follows:

Baseline (T0, week 1): Blood, urine, stool and subcutaneous adipose tissue samples; After 3 months (T1, week 13): Blood, urine, stool and subcutaneous adipose tissue samples; After 6 months (T2, week 25): Blood, urine, and stool; After 12 months (T3, week 52): Blood and urine; Magnet resonance tomography imaging (MRI, at T0, T1 and T3) and lifestyle assessments (nutrition behavior, physical activity and quality of life, T0-T3) will be performed to unravel the link to fat distribution, metabolic changes, health and lifestyle. The primary objective of the three-arm randomized controlled intervention trial is to investigate the effect of nutrition intervention on body weight and gene expression profile in subcutaneous adipose tissue of overweight and obese individuals. We hypothesize that better compliance rates will be achieved by the ICR rather than by the CCR group and that ICR will show a higher sustainability with respect to weight loss, weight maintenance, and biomarker profiles. The purpose of this study is further to analyze if the nutrition interventions and associated weight loss have different effects on abdominal fat distribution and liver fat content.

The statistical analysis will be carried out by using the SAS statistical software [SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA] or comparable software. Descriptive statistics, correlations and univariate analyses will be used to get insight on general characteristics of participants in the intervention groups. For the primary objective, two sided t-test and ANCOVA modelling will be performed to investigate whether changes in gene expression levels are affected by nutrition intervention. Comparisons between two groups (e.g. ICR and CCR or CCR/ICR and control group) will be carried out using t-tests and parallel comparison across the three groups will be carried out using ANCOVA models. Where applicable, the analyses will include adjustments for confounders, specially age and gender. Likewise, stratified analysis will be carried out as necessary. ANCOVA models will be performed to evaluate the effects of nutrition intervention on biomarker profiles, adjusted by strata age and gender. Similar evaluations will be performed for fat distribution patterns, quality of life, physical activity and nutrition patterns. In addition, correlation and linear regression analyses will be performed to measure effects of weight-loss, gene expression levels and metabolic profiles, controlled by nutrition intervention group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, D-69120
        • German Cancer Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women and men aged 35 to 65 years
  • Overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 ≤ 40 kg/m2 )
  • German speaking
  • Non- smoker
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to understand and sign the informed consent form in person
  • Already diagnosed diabetes
  • HbA1c ≥ 6.5 % and/or fasting plasma glucose > 125 mg/dl
  • History of cancer within the past 10 years
  • Risk of bleeding disorders (e.g. Marcumar intake)
  • Current or history of eating disorders (bulimia, anorexia, binge-eating)
  • Pregnant or lactating during the past 12 months
  • Increased or decreased thyroid-stimulating hormone in baseline blood check
  • Already diagnosed hepatic dysfunction and/or increased or decreased γ-GT, GPT and/or GOT in baseline blood check
  • Already diagnosed kidney dysfunction and/or increased or decreased creatinine, urea and/or uric acid in baseline blood check
  • Medications that might affect the endpoints of the study e.g. immunosuppressive medication (cortisol, antibody treatment), hormone replacement therapy, medication for fat metabolism (e.g. statine, fibrate)
  • Participation in another intervention study shorter than three months ago

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intermittent Calorie Restriction
2 days per week fasting with 25 % energy intake and 5 days per week at 100% energy intake
diet intervention to reduce the risk for obesity associated diseases
Other Names:
  • weight loss trial;
Experimental: Continuous Calorie Restriction
daily energy intake of 80 %
diet intervention to reduce the risk for obesity associated diseases
Other Names:
  • weight loss trial;
No Intervention: Healthy Nutrition
general advice on healthy nutrition

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in gene expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue measured by whole genome sequencing
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), and after the intervention phase (week 13)
Assessments at baseline (week 0), and after the intervention phase (week 13)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in abdominal fat distribution pattern (visceral, subcutaneous, total adipose tissue) measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13),and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13),and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Changes in blood-based biomarkers, i.e. parameters of inflammation, adipokines, growth and hormonal factors, which have been shown to be associated with obesity-related chronic diseases before
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintenance phase (week 25), and after the maintenance phase (week 25)
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintenance phase (week 25), and after the maintenance phase (week 25)
Changes in weight (kg)
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Changes in BMI (kg/m2)
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Changes in waist circumference (cm)
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Changes in hip circumference (cm)
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Changes in blood pressure (mm/Hg)
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Changes in pulse (bpm)
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Changes in quality of life (as defined by changes in SF-12-derived scores)
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0) and after the intervention phase (week 13)
Assessments at baseline (week 0) and after the intervention phase (week 13)
Changes in liver fat content measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13),and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13),and after the follow-up phase (week 52)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the composition of the gut microbiota by taxonomic, functional, and comparative analysis of sequencing data
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Exploratory Outcome
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Changes in blood metabolites, as measured by LC-MS/MS-based targeted and untargeted metabolomics tools
Time Frame: Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)
Exploratory Outcome
Assessments at baseline (week 0), after the intervention phase (week 13), after the maintencance phase (week 25) and after the follow-up phase (week 52)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tilman Kühn, PhD, German Cancer Research Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metabolic Diseases

Clinical Trials on Calorie Restriction

Subscribe