- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02453347
Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) Therapy (CES)
Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) Therapy for PTSD and Anxiety in OEF/OIF Veterans With Mild TBI
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Veterans from conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq exhibit numerous signature injuries to include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and anxiety. These three conditions commonly co-occur together, which presents treatment challenges. First, current treatment guidelines focus on treating each of these conditions individually and do not sufficiently account for comorbid presentation. As a consequence, Veterans with comorbid disorders may have poor clinical health outcomes despite receiving treatment. Second, treating anxiety among Veterans with comorbid PTSD and TBI involves medications that may have limited efficacy (e.g., PTSD medications) or side effects (e.g., drug interactions or diminished cognitive function).
Given these treatment challenges, Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) may serve as an effective complimentary, noninvasive/non-pharmacological treatment for this Veteran population. Briefly, CES is administered through a therapeutic device (such as Alpha-Stim®) marketed and approved by the FDA to treat insomnia, depression, anxiety, and pain. Additionally, both the Department of Defense (DoD) and Veterans Health Affairs (VHA) prescribe CES to treat trauma-related conditions. CES treatment involves transcutaneous application of pulsed micro-currents of <1000 μA to the patient's head and these currents are tailored specifically for each patient. The studies that have examined efficacy for CES therapy in treating anxiety have shown some positive effects, however, the patient populations were typically small, sometimes limited to case reports, and outcome measures varied significantly. A meta-analysis performed on CES studies over two decades ago found evidence for CES treatment over sham groups, but most of the studies reviewed were missing data and study personnel were not always blinded to the groups. Additionally, CES has showed a significant improvement in anxiety symptoms after of CES therapy in 12 adult patients diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; Bystritsky et al., [2008]). The success of CES in treating anxiety may indicate a suitable signal for exploring its use in PTSD samples (Novakovic et al. [2011]). Given the relatively few CES studies available in the scholarly literature, a 2009 Cochrane Systematic Review found insufficient evidence to support using CES to manage persistent TBI symptoms. While some of these studies are encouraging, the device has not been clearly demonstrated to be effective in the multi-morbid OEF/OIF/OND Veteran population. Additionally, little information is known about the mechanism of action for CES.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78230
- Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male outpatient, OEF/OIF/OND Veterans diagnosed during the course of clinical care with mild TBI and PTSD, and screened positive for anxiety
- Good medical health and stable chronic medical conditions.
- No current alcohol or substance abuse.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with moderate or severe TBI or seizure disorders.
- Prior CES use
- Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, or other psychiatric condition that would require inpatient hospitalization or medical disease that would impair reliable participation in the trial.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CES Therapy
All participants will complete CES treatment over the course of four weeks.
Assessments will take place at baseline and at post-test four weeks later.
|
Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) may serve as an effective complimentary, noninvasive/non-pharmacological treatment for this Veteran population.
CES is administered through a therapeutic device (such as Alpha-Stim®) marketed and approved by the FDA to treat insomnia, depression, anxiety, and pain.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PCL-5 (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) for Use in Treating PTSD Symptoms
Time Frame: Four Weeks
|
To measure the effect of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) use on symptoms related to PTSD. The PCL-5 is a self-report measure that can be completed by patients in a waiting room prior to a session or by participants as part of a research study. The survey has 20 questions scored as: 0=Not at all
|
Four Weeks
|
|
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: Four Weeks
|
To measure the effect of CES use on trait and state anxiety.
These scales comprise 20 items each and are scored on 4-point forced-choice response scales from 1 (seldom) to 4 (frequent).
Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores suggesting greater levels of anxiety.The state and trait anxiety scales both range from 20 to 80 and are combined to yield a total score ranging from 40 to 160, where low scores suggest mild anxiety, median scores suggest moderate anxiety, and high scores suggest severe anxiety.
Both scales include direct (presence of anxiety) and reverse-worded (absence of anxiety) items.
Reverse-worded item scores are reverse scored and then totaled with the remaining items.
|
Four Weeks
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
A 21 question set to assess subjects feelings in the last week. Each question has a set of at least 4 possible responses, ranging in intensity: (0) I do not feel sad.
|
4 weeks
|
|
TFI (Tinnitus Functional Index)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
To measure the severity of tinnitus.
The survey consists of 25 questions ranked from 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (completely interfered).
At least 19 of the 25 questions are required to be answered, and rankings are added together to give a maximum possible score of 250, which would be the most severe interference by tinnitus.
|
4 weeks
|
|
MPAI (Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
The inventory consists of 29 items in 3 subscales (Ability, the Adjustment and Participation Index) plus an additional 6 items that are not included in the MPAI-4 score.
The first 29 scale items are intended to reflect the current status of the individual with brain injury without attempting to determine whether their status might be influenced by factors other than ABI (acquired brain injury).
Items are scored from 0 to 4, with 0 being the most favorable score for each item, with a cumulative score ranging from 0 to 116 for all the items.
A lower score indicates better adaptability.
|
4 weeks
|
|
WAIS (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) Symbol Search
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
The Symbol Search subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale designed to assess information processing speed and visual perception with a minimum score of 0 as the lowest (worst performance) to 60 as the highest score (best performance).
|
4 weeks
|
|
WAIS Coding - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
The test has two batteries of subtests grouped into two general areas: 1) Verbal scales; and 2) Performance scales. The Verbal scales measure general knowledge, language, reasoning, and memory skills, while the Performance scales measure spatial, sequencing, and problem-solving skills. The tests are administered to individual examinees by trained examiners, using a complex set of test materials. Testing requires approximately 90 minutes. Raw scores on each test are converted to standard scores with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3. Scale scores in the Verbal battery are summed and converted to a Verbal Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score; the same is done for the Performance scale scores which yield the Performance IQ score. In turn, the Verbal and Performance IQ scores are summed and converted to obtain the Full Scale (overall) IQ score with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate a higher IQ. |
4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Dizziness- NSI (Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory)
Time Frame: Four Weeks
|
To measure the effect of CES use on somatic symptoms related to TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury), including dizziness.
The assessment scale rate 22 symptoms that may have disturbed subjects from 0 = no symptoms to 4 = very severe in the previous 2 weeks.
The scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 88, where the higher the point value, the greater the symptoms.
|
Four Weeks
|
|
Headache - HIT6 (Headache Impact Test)
Time Frame: Four Weeks
|
To assess for improvements in measures of somatic symptoms related to TBI (headaches).
The test is scored by adding points to 6 different categories related to frequency and severity of symptoms.
The 6 category scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 36 to 78.
Fewer points signify less severity and higher point scores signify more severe symptoms according to patient assessment.
|
Four Weeks
|
|
Sleep - Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Four Weeks
|
To assess for improvements in measures of somatic symptoms related to TBI (insomnia). The scoring consists of 19 items, the PSQI measures several different aspects of sleep, offering seven component scores and one composite score. The component scores consist of subjective sleep quality, sleep latency (i.e., how long it takes to fall asleep), sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency (i.e., the percentage of time in bed that one is asleep), sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. |
Four Weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Carlos A Jaramillo, M.D., Ph.D., San Antonio Polytrauma Center South Texas Veterans Health Care System
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15-352H (UTHSCSA IRB)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Depression
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruitingDepression | Depression - Major Depressive Disorder | Depression Chronic | Depression in Adults | Depression Disorders | Depression DisorderUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Active, not recruitingDepression Moderate | Depression Mild | Depression, TeenUnited States
-
ProgenaBiomeWithdrawnDepression | Depression, Postpartum | Depression, Anxiety | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Clinical Depression | Depression in Remission | Depression, Endogenous | Depression ChronicUnited States
-
Sorlandet Hospital HFUniversity of Oslo; Karolinska Institutet; Australian Catholic University; Helse...RecruitingAnxiety | Anxiety Depression | Depression Anxiety Disorder | Depression - Major Depressive DisorderNorway
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedTreatment Resistant Depression | Late Life Depression | Geriatric Depression | Refractory Depression | Therapy-Resistant DepressionUnited States, Canada
-
Lipocine Inc.CompletedDepression, Postpartum | Postnatal Depression | Peripartum Depression | Depression, Post-Partum | Postpartum Depression (PPD) | Post-Natal DepressionUnited States
-
Kintsugi Mindful Wellness, Inc.Sonar Strategies; Vituity PsychiatryActive, not recruitingDepression | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Depression MildUnited States
-
Kintsugi Mindful Wellness, Inc.Sonar Strategies; Kolby Walker, DO; Brittany KimbleRecruitingDepression | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Depression MildUnited States
-
University of CincinnatiNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)RecruitingMild DepressionUnited States
-
Fondation FondaMentalGYNOVNot yet recruitingDepression | Depression in Adults | Depression DisorderFrance
Clinical Trials on CES Therapy
-
China Medical University HospitalNot yet recruitingDepression, AnxietyTaiwan
-
Wyndhurst Counseling CenterLiberty UniversityCompletedAnxietyUnited States
-
Liu Hsing YuRecruitingSleep | Depression DisordersTaiwan
-
Tufts UniversityUnited States Department of DefenseCompleted
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreCompletedParkinson's DiseaseUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedOsteo Arthritis KneeUnited States
-
Beth Israel Medical CenterCompletedBi-polar II DisorderUnited States
-
Emory UniversityCongressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsRecruitingGulf War SyndromeUnited States
-
Electromedical Products International, Inc.University of NottinghamRecruiting
-
Brooke Army Medical CenterCompletedNeuropathic PainUnited States