Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) Therapy (CES)

Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) Therapy for PTSD and Anxiety in OEF/OIF Veterans With Mild TBI

The primary aim of this proposed study is to gather preliminary data for CES use in treating PTSD and anxiety symptoms in OEF/OIF Veterans with PTSD and a history of TBI.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Veterans from conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq exhibit numerous signature injuries to include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and anxiety. These three conditions commonly co-occur together, which presents treatment challenges. First, current treatment guidelines focus on treating each of these conditions individually and do not sufficiently account for comorbid presentation. As a consequence, Veterans with comorbid disorders may have poor clinical health outcomes despite receiving treatment. Second, treating anxiety among Veterans with comorbid PTSD and TBI involves medications that may have limited efficacy (e.g., PTSD medications) or side effects (e.g., drug interactions or diminished cognitive function).

Given these treatment challenges, Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) may serve as an effective complimentary, noninvasive/non-pharmacological treatment for this Veteran population. Briefly, CES is administered through a therapeutic device (such as Alpha-Stim®) marketed and approved by the FDA to treat insomnia, depression, anxiety, and pain. Additionally, both the Department of Defense (DoD) and Veterans Health Affairs (VHA) prescribe CES to treat trauma-related conditions. CES treatment involves transcutaneous application of pulsed micro-currents of <1000 μA to the patient's head and these currents are tailored specifically for each patient. The studies that have examined efficacy for CES therapy in treating anxiety have shown some positive effects, however, the patient populations were typically small, sometimes limited to case reports, and outcome measures varied significantly. A meta-analysis performed on CES studies over two decades ago found evidence for CES treatment over sham groups, but most of the studies reviewed were missing data and study personnel were not always blinded to the groups. Additionally, CES has showed a significant improvement in anxiety symptoms after of CES therapy in 12 adult patients diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; Bystritsky et al., [2008]). The success of CES in treating anxiety may indicate a suitable signal for exploring its use in PTSD samples (Novakovic et al. [2011]). Given the relatively few CES studies available in the scholarly literature, a 2009 Cochrane Systematic Review found insufficient evidence to support using CES to manage persistent TBI symptoms. While some of these studies are encouraging, the device has not been clearly demonstrated to be effective in the multi-morbid OEF/OIF/OND Veteran population. Additionally, little information is known about the mechanism of action for CES.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78230
        • Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male outpatient, OEF/OIF/OND Veterans diagnosed during the course of clinical care with mild TBI and PTSD, and screened positive for anxiety
  • Good medical health and stable chronic medical conditions.
  • No current alcohol or substance abuse.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with moderate or severe TBI or seizure disorders.
  • Prior CES use
  • Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, or other psychiatric condition that would require inpatient hospitalization or medical disease that would impair reliable participation in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CES Therapy
All participants will complete CES treatment over the course of four weeks. Assessments will take place at baseline and at post-test four weeks later.
Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) may serve as an effective complimentary, noninvasive/non-pharmacological treatment for this Veteran population. CES is administered through a therapeutic device (such as Alpha-Stim®) marketed and approved by the FDA to treat insomnia, depression, anxiety, and pain.
Other Names:
  • Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) Therapy
  • Alpha Stim

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PCL-5 (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) for Use in Treating PTSD Symptoms
Time Frame: Four Weeks

To measure the effect of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) use on symptoms related to PTSD.

The PCL-5 is a self-report measure that can be completed by patients in a waiting room prior to a session or by participants as part of a research study.

The survey has 20 questions scored as:

0=Not at all

  1. A little bit
  2. Moderately
  3. Quite a bit
  4. Extremely Interpretation of the PCL-5 should be made by a clinician. The total symptom severity score is obtained by summing the scores for each of the 20 items and ranges from 0 to 80. The lower the score, the less severe the symptoms of PTSD, the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms. For a person to have a probable diagnosis of PTSD sufficient criteria must be moderately to extremely met in each of the four symptom groups (i.e., one or more of questions 1-5, either question 6 or 7, two or more of questions 8-14, two or more of questions 15-20). In addition, a score of 38 or higher indicates probable PTSD in veterans.
Four Weeks
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: Four Weeks
To measure the effect of CES use on trait and state anxiety. These scales comprise 20 items each and are scored on 4-point forced-choice response scales from 1 (seldom) to 4 (frequent). Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores suggesting greater levels of anxiety.The state and trait anxiety scales both range from 20 to 80 and are combined to yield a total score ranging from 40 to 160, where low scores suggest mild anxiety, median scores suggest moderate anxiety, and high scores suggest severe anxiety. Both scales include direct (presence of anxiety) and reverse-worded (absence of anxiety) items. Reverse-worded item scores are reverse scored and then totaled with the remaining items.
Four Weeks
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: 4 weeks

A 21 question set to assess subjects feelings in the last week. Each question has a set of at least 4 possible responses, ranging in intensity:

(0) I do not feel sad.

  1. I feel sad.
  2. I am sad all the time and I can't snap out of it.
  3. I am so sad or unhappy that I can't stand it. When the test is scored, a value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer and then the total score ranging from 0 to 63 is compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
4 weeks
TFI (Tinnitus Functional Index)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
To measure the severity of tinnitus. The survey consists of 25 questions ranked from 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (completely interfered). At least 19 of the 25 questions are required to be answered, and rankings are added together to give a maximum possible score of 250, which would be the most severe interference by tinnitus.
4 weeks
MPAI (Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The inventory consists of 29 items in 3 subscales (Ability, the Adjustment and Participation Index) plus an additional 6 items that are not included in the MPAI-4 score. The first 29 scale items are intended to reflect the current status of the individual with brain injury without attempting to determine whether their status might be influenced by factors other than ABI (acquired brain injury). Items are scored from 0 to 4, with 0 being the most favorable score for each item, with a cumulative score ranging from 0 to 116 for all the items. A lower score indicates better adaptability.
4 weeks
WAIS (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) Symbol Search
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Symbol Search subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale designed to assess information processing speed and visual perception with a minimum score of 0 as the lowest (worst performance) to 60 as the highest score (best performance).
4 weeks
WAIS Coding - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks

The test has two batteries of subtests grouped into two general areas: 1) Verbal scales; and 2) Performance scales. The Verbal scales measure general knowledge, language, reasoning, and memory skills, while the Performance scales measure spatial, sequencing, and problem-solving skills.

The tests are administered to individual examinees by trained examiners, using a complex set of test materials. Testing requires approximately 90 minutes. Raw scores on each test are converted to standard scores with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3. Scale scores in the Verbal battery are summed and converted to a Verbal Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score; the same is done for the Performance scale scores which yield the Performance IQ score. In turn, the Verbal and Performance IQ scores are summed and converted to obtain the Full Scale (overall) IQ score with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate a higher IQ.

4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dizziness- NSI (Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory)
Time Frame: Four Weeks
To measure the effect of CES use on somatic symptoms related to TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury), including dizziness. The assessment scale rate 22 symptoms that may have disturbed subjects from 0 = no symptoms to 4 = very severe in the previous 2 weeks. The scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 88, where the higher the point value, the greater the symptoms.
Four Weeks
Headache - HIT6 (Headache Impact Test)
Time Frame: Four Weeks
To assess for improvements in measures of somatic symptoms related to TBI (headaches). The test is scored by adding points to 6 different categories related to frequency and severity of symptoms. The 6 category scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 36 to 78. Fewer points signify less severity and higher point scores signify more severe symptoms according to patient assessment.
Four Weeks
Sleep - Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Four Weeks

To assess for improvements in measures of somatic symptoms related to TBI (insomnia). The scoring consists of 19 items, the PSQI measures several different aspects of sleep, offering seven component scores and one composite score. The component scores consist of subjective sleep quality, sleep latency (i.e., how long it takes to fall asleep), sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency (i.e., the percentage of time in bed that one is asleep), sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction.

Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.

Four Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carlos A Jaramillo, M.D., Ph.D., San Antonio Polytrauma Center South Texas Veterans Health Care System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 25, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on CES Therapy

Subscribe