The Transfusion Triggers in Vascular Surgery Trial (TV)

July 22, 2017 updated by: Anders Møller, Naestved Hospital

The Transfusion Triggers in Vascular Surgery Trial: Two Different Transfusion Triggers for Postoperative Haemoglobin Separation and Adherence to Transfusion Strategies in Vascular Surgery: a Randomised Clinical Feasibility Trial

BACKGROUND

  • Vascular surgical patients often receive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in the peri-operative period
  • RBC transfusion may lead to improved outcome but on the other hand the intervention may be harmful
  • Danish Health and Medicines Authority recommends transfusion of RBC at hemoglobin below 5 mmol/L while local clinical guidelines recommend transfusion of RBC to maintain hemoglobin levels above 6 mmol/L
  • A large randomized clinical trial is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion in patients undergoing vascular surgery.
  • A trial examining the effect of RBC transfusion on tissue oxygenation is used to test the trial-design and feasibility for a trial evaluating post-operative mortality and morbidity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

DESIGN Single-center, randomized, open-label trial including vascular surgical patients for peri-operative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

If the patient drops out of the trial, either at his/her own request or due to withdrawal from active therapy, the patient will be followed up in the intention-to-treat analyses.

PROTOCOL SUSPENSION

The patient can temporarily be suspended from the protocol in the following circumstances, if the clinician in charge finds indication for blood transfusions not adhering to the planned transfusion threshold:

  • Uncontrollable bleeding, defined as loss of surgical hemostasis resulting in overt or imminent hemodynamic instability with insufficient tissue oxygenation and increasing lactate production OR
  • Hypotension unresponsive to fluid replacement OR
  • Decompensated heart failure OR
  • Stroke, extremity- and intestinal ischaemia

SAMPLE SIZE With a total of 50 randomised patients, the trial is powered to

  • Show difference in mean postoperative hemoglobin of 1.0 mmol/L. With a power of 95%, 5% significance and a standard deviation of 0.9 mmol/L.
  • Show a difference in 2 units (600 mL) of RBC transfused based on a standard deviation of RBC transfusion volume of 717 mL, with a power of 80 % and 5% significance
  • Produce a 97.5% confidence interval (CI) equal to the sample adherence prevalence plus or minus 8% when the true prevalence of adherence is hypothesized to be 90%
  • Detect a difference in near infrared spectroscopy-determined tissue oxygenation (ScO2) of 6 % during surgery. With a power of 80%, 5% significance and a ScO2-standard deviation of 7%

TIME-LINE The first patient is expected to be randomized June 8th 2015, the last will be randomized March 31st 2016 and the trial database is expected to be closed ultimo June 2016. The main manuscript will be submitted shortly thereafter.

PROTOCOL AMENDMENTS

  1. The Ethical Committee of Region Zealand has approved a protocol amendment of March 29th 2016 for permission of extending the trial period to the end of 2016.
  2. On September 20th 2016 The Ethical Committee of Region Zealand approved a protocol amendment of September 16th 2016 for permission of extending the sample size to 58 patients and extending the trial period to June 31st 2017.

The 2nd amendment was submitted to compensate for an unexpected high rate of patients randomised postoperatively and thus to secure a sufficient sample size (n=44) for the primary outcome measure, postoperative Hb, and the secondary outcome measures NIRS and ROTEM.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Region Zealand
      • Slagelse, Region Zealand, Denmark, 4200
        • Slagelse Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients for planned open repair of the abdominal aorta or infrainguinal arterial bypass
  • Hemoglobin < 6 mmol/L

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented wish against transfusion
  • Previous serious adverse reaction with blood products
  • Unable to understand the benefits and risks of testing
  • Previous participation in trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Low transfusion trigger
Intervention group. Low or restrictive transfusion trigger: hemoglobin < 5 mmol/L (approx. 8 g/dl or a hematocrit of 25%) This trigger is what is recommended by the Danish Health and Medicines Authority for stable patients with chronic heart disease.
Other Names:
  • erythrocyte transfusion
Active Comparator: High transfusion trigger
Control group. High or liberal transfusion trigger: hemoglobin < 6 mmol/L (approx. 10 g/dl or a hematocrit of 30%) This trigger reflects the practice among Danish vascular anesthesiologists and correspond to the transfusion trigger recommended by the European society for vascular surgery
Other Names:
  • erythrocyte transfusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Post-operative hemoglobin (longitudinal outcome)
Time Frame: Day 0 - 15
Day 0 is the hemoglobin measured upon arrival at the recovery room or at the intensive care unit depending on what level of care the patient needs after surgery.
Day 0 - 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Units of red blood cells transfused (count data)
Time Frame: 30 days after operation
During 30 day trial period
30 days after operation
Recruitment rate with 95% confidence interval
Time Frame: Day -1 (day before operation)
Defined as the ratio of: number of patients included divided by the number of patients eligible (fulfilling the inclusion criteria)
Day -1 (day before operation)
Protocol suspension
Time Frame: 30 days after operation
Number of patients having their protocol suspended after primary inclusion due to hemodynamic instability
30 days after operation
Protocol adherence
Time Frame: 30 days after operation
Adherence to hemoglobin concentrations used for transfusion triggers
30 days after operation
Intraoperative tissue oxygenation
Time Frame: Participants will be monitored during their stay at the operation theatre, an expected average of 3 hours
The outcome measure is defined as lowest values and area-under-baseline calculations. Baseline is defined as the average saturation value over a 1-min period after the patient has been fluid optimized after induction of anesthesia, before start of surgery.
Participants will be monitored during their stay at the operation theatre, an expected average of 3 hours
Changes in coagulation competence measured by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Time Frame: An expected average time frame of 3 hours
Changes in coagulation competence will be the baseline ROTEM level (before induction of anesthesia) compared to the end of surgery ROTEM level.
An expected average time frame of 3 hours
Severe adverse events
Time Frame: 30 days after operation
myocardial injury, acute kidney injury, 30-days mortality, ischemic stroke, severe adverse transfusion reactions
30 days after operation
Explorative Outcomes
Time Frame: 90 days after operation
  1. Major cardiovascular events (acute myocardial infarction, stroke, renal replacement therapy, vascular reoperation and amputation) (dichotomous outcome) AND
  2. Days alive outside hospital within 90 days (count data)
90 days after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anders Møller, Resident, Slagelse Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 9, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arterial Occlusive Diseases

Clinical Trials on red blood cell transfusion

3
Subscribe