Self-regulated Constraint-induced Movement Therapy in Subacute Stroke Patients

June 26, 2015 updated by: Karen Liu, University of Western Sydney
Emerging research suggests the use of self-regulation (SR) strategies at improving functional regain in patients with brain injury. SR is proposed to produce an added effect to the effective constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a self-regulated CIMT program (SR-CIMT) for function regain of patients with subacute stroke. It was hypothesized that participants receiving the combined treatment (SR and CIMT) would have a better functional regain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background - Emerging research suggests the use of self-regulation (SR) strategies at improving functional regain in patients with brain injury. SR is proposed to produce an added effect to the effective constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT).

Objective - This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a self-regulated CIMT program (SR-CIMT) for function regain of patients with sub-acute stroke.

Methods - Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to the self-regulated constraint-induced movement therapy (SR-CIMT; n=25), constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT; n=27) or conventional functional rehabilitation (control; n=24) groups, and completed the trial.

The SR-CIMT intervention was two-week therapist-guided training using the SR strategy to reflect on the relearning of functional tasks with CIMT. Outcome measurements were for upper limb function (Action Research Arm Test, ARAT, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FMA), daily task performance (Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Lawton IADL) and self-perceived functional ability (Motor Activity Log, MAL) at pre and post intervention intervals, and at one month follow up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Shatin Hospital
      • Yuen Long, Hong Kong
        • Pok Oi Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

56 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • sustained an ischemic type stroke with lesion in the primary or motor cortical areas resulting in hemiplegia,
  • had stroke onset of less than 3 months,
  • were aged above 60, and
  • had 10 degree active extension in metacarpophalangeal joint and interphalangeal joint, 20 degree active extension of wrist joint

Exclusion Criteria:

  • had excessive spasticity in the affected limb, as defined by a score of 2 or more on the Modified Ashworth Scale,
  • had excessive pain in the affected limb, as defined by a score 4 or more using a Visual Analog Scale,
  • had a score below 19 on the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), and
  • had diagnosed of depression according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (DSM-IV) criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Self-regulated constraint-induced movement therapy
Self-regulated constraint-induced movement therapy (SR-CIMT) - participants' non-hemiplegic arm was restrained in a mitt for 4 hours every day, 2 weeks, 5 days a week (therapy days) (CIMT) (the same CIMT protocol as in the CIMT group described under 'comparator/control treatment'); participants were taught using the self-regulation (SR) strategy to relearn the tasks; SR strategy involved participants self reflecting on their abilities and deficits in performing the tasks, identifying problems and solutions in achieving the most independence in the tasks, and then actually carrying out the tasks.
There were 10 tasks to practice in total, they included fold laundry, put clothes on hanger, brush teeth, dress upper garment, dress lower garment in week one; and use telephone, prepare a cup of tea, sweep floor, wash towel, wash dishes in week two. In the 4 hours when the participants had their non-hemiplegic arm in the restrain, they received one hour therapist-guided training using SR strategy on task relearning as described above. Therefore, all participants received 10 one-hour therapist-guided training sessions (daily on weekdays, total two weeks). The intervention was delivered by occupational therapist. For the rest of the 3 hours in the restrain, the participants' wearing of the restrain was monitored by the nursing staff in the ward.
Active Comparator: Constraint-induced movement therapy
In the constraint-induced movement therapy group (CIMT), participants' non-hemiplegic arm was restrained in a mitt for 4 hours every day, 2 weeks, 5 days a week (therapy days); therapist provided demonstration on the adapted task performance with one arm (the side of participants' hemiplegic arm), and participants to practice the tasks with the unrestrained hemiplegic arm under supervision.
They practised the same 10 tasks as in the SR-CIMT and control groups. The same as the experimental intervention group (SR-CIMT), in the 4 hours when the participants had their non-hemiplegic arm in the restrain, they received one hour therapist-guided training using the strategy on task relearning as described above. Therefore, all participants received 10 one-hour therapist-guided training sessions (daily on weekdays, total two weeks). The intervention was delivered by occupational therapist. For the rest of the 3 hours in the restrain, the participants' wearing of the restrain was monitored by the nursing staff in the ward.
Active Comparator: Conventional occupational therapy
It involved therapist to demonstrate the adapted task performance followed by patient's practice under supervision.
They practised the same 10 tasks as in the SR-CIMT group described above. They received training for 2 weeks, 5 days a week (therapy days), the same as in the SR-CIMT and CIMT groups.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Performance assessment on 8 daily tasks
Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale at one month after the intervention completed
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)
Performance assessment on 8 daily tasks
Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Action Research Arm Test after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Performance assessment on arm function
Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Action Research Arm Test at one month after the intervention completed
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)
Performance assessment on arm function
Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Fugl Meyer Assessment, upper extremity motor subsection after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Performance assessment on arm function
Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Fugl Meyer Assessment, upper extremity motor subsection at one month after the intervention completed
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)
Performance assessment on arm function
Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Motor Activity Log-28 after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Self-reported assessment on daily function
Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Motor Activity Log-28 at one month after the intervention completed
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)
Self-reported assessment on daily function
Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen P.Y. Liu, PhD, University of Western Sydney

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Lam, K., Liu, K., Leung, T., Sum, C., Yue, A. & Mok, V. (2013, 24-26 July). The effectiveness of self-regulated constraint-induced movement therapy for functional regain for people with sub-acute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 110.
  • Leung, T., Liu, K.P.Y., Sum, C., Mok, V. & Lum, C. (2010). Self-regulation constraint-induced movement therapy programme for people with subacute stroke. Hong Kong Hospital Authority Rehabilitation Symposium.
  • Leung, T., Liu, K.P.Y., Sum, C., Mok, V. & Lum, C. (2010). Self-regulation constraint-induced movement therapy programme for people with subacute stroke. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy,19, A8.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Self-regulated constraint-induced movement therapy

Subscribe