Gait Analyses After Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty Versus Metal on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty, an Exploratory Study

July 14, 2016 updated by: Job van Susante, Rijnstate Hospital

Gait Analyses After Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty Versus Metal on Metal Total Hip

Total hip replacement surgery is a very successful operation with good long-term results. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is offered as a treatment option for young and active patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. It has been proposed as a treatment option for younger patients because of claims that it preserves femoral bone stock and has better functional outcomes. The assessment of gait after hip replacement surgery may be able to determine functional differences between patients who have undergone total hip replacement / arthroplasty (THA) versus hip resurfacing.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A group of 58 patients, part of a ungoing randomized trial comparing resurfacing hip arthroplasty to metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty, will be invited to a single gait analysis on a trendmill. All patients have reached a follow up of five years. Patient 's gait will be assessed during two walking sessions, in both sessions spatio-temporal, kinetic and kinematic parameters will be recorded.

  • At first when flat walking with increasing speeds to their top walking speed.
  • Secondly: when walking at a fixed speed with an increasing incline to their top walking incline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6800WC
        • Rijnstate Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient part of randomised controlled trial (RCT) of hip resurfacing versus MoM total hip arthroplasty for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip
  • Patient must be able to consent to the study (written informed consent)
  • Patients who are functioning well post-operatively and not under routine follow up
  • Patients who are able to walk without any safety rail assistance on the treadmill

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient not originally randomised during an RCT of hip resurfacing versus MoM total hip arthroplasty
  • Patients who suffer from any neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that might make a gait test dangerous.
  • Patients whose cognitive function prevents them from understanding the study
  • Patients who have had or are awaiting revision surgery for their hip

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Total Hip Arthroplasty
Gait analysis on a trendmill of patients with a well functioning total hip arthroplasty on a trendmill
Gait analysis on a trendmill "GRAIL" to analyse spatio-temporal kinetics and kinematics when flat walking and inclining
Other Names:
  • Gait realtime analysis interactive lab: MOTEK Medical
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty
Gait analysis on a trendmill of patients with a well functioning resurfacing hip arthroplasty on a trendmill
Gait analysis on a trendmill "GRAIL" to analyse spatio-temporal kinetics and kinematics when flat walking and inclining
Other Names:
  • Gait realtime analysis interactive lab: MOTEK Medical

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Top walking speed
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
Mean top walking speed in kilometers / hour assessed on a trendmill
5 years postoperative
Walking cadence
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
Mean steps / minute at top walking speed assessed on a trendmill
5 years postoperative
Step length
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
Mean step distance in meters at top walking speed assessed on a trendmill
5 years postoperative
Maximum Push off force (N/kg) per cycle
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
Mean ground reaction forces in Newton / kilogram on a trendmill
5 years postoperative
Maximum weight acceptance (N/kg) per cycle
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
Mean ground reaction forces assessed on a trendmill
5 years postoperative
Mid-stance force (N/kg) per cycle
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
Mean ground reaction forces assessed on a trendmill
5 years postoperative
Hip maximum flexion/extension per cycle
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
Mean hip kinematics in degrees assessed on a trendmill
5 years postoperative
Hip maximum internal/external rotation per cycle
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
Mean hip kinematics in degrees assessed on a trendmill
5 years postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative hip functionality after hip arthroplasty.
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
Postoperative hip function according the Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
5 years postoperative
General Health according EurQol-5D
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
Health outcome on the EQ-5D questionairre
5 years postoperative
Physical activity level according the UCLA-activity score
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score
5 years postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Job LC Susante, Dr, Rijnstate Hospital, orthopedic surgeon

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gait, Stumbling

Clinical Trials on Gait analysis on a trendmill

Subscribe