Determination of Peripheral Immune Cell Activity During Treatment With Either Surgery or Radiotherapy in Patients With Early Stage NSCLC (HAMLET)

November 6, 2024 updated by: Joachim Aerts, MD PhD, Erasmus Medical Center

Determination of Peripheral Immune Cell Activity During Treatment With Either Surgery or Radiotherapy in Patients With Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer HAMLET Study

Rationale: An anatomical surgical resection is considered to be the standard of care in fit patients who present with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, surgery is less frequently performed in both elderly patients (aged ≥75 years), who represent the fastest-growing group of patients with stage I/II NSCLC, and in patients who have significant co-morbidity. Following the introduction of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), an outpatient treatment that is typically delivered in between 3-8 fractions, the median survival of all elderly patients undergoing radiotherapy in The Netherlands increased by 9.3 months. Randomized trials comparing SABR and surgery have yet to be completed and results of the ongoing ACOSOG Z4032 studies will not be available in the within 5 years. A recent data retrospective study comparing both modalities has raised interesting questions about the impact of local therapy on recurrence patterns. It was found that a better loco-regional disease control rate was achieved with SABR.

Objective: To study the effect of surgery and SABR on both immunostimulatory (with primary endpoint CD8 positive cells) and immunosuppressive cells in peripheral blood in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who are treated with either modality.

Study population: 40 patients with cT1-2aN0M0 either cytologically or histologically proven NSCLC.

Main study parameters/endpoints: To determine whether an increase in CD8 activity can be established after SABR in patients with early stage lung cancer and to compare this increase with that in patients undergoing a surgical intervention. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Only risks in participation are the risks with drawing blood. Subjects will not have any benefits. This pilot study will be used to generate information concerning both treatments useful for the decision to plan a future study in a larger series of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • VU Medical Center
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
    • Zuid-Holland
      • Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 3015GD
        • Erasmus MC Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cytologically or histologically proven cT1-2aN0M0 NSCLC
  • Patients ≥ 18 years old
  • Patients should be fit to undergo both treatments in accordance with institutional protocols

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with any signs of any co-existing infectious disease or immunosuppressive treatment (inhalation steroids are permitted)
  • Mentally incapacitated subjects

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Surgery
An anatomical surgical resection of primary tumor
Active Comparator: Radiotherapy
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR), outpatient treatment that is typically delivered in between 3-8 fractions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of IFN-gamma/ Granzyme B producing CD8 T cells
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0)
Number and activation status of peripheral CD8+ T cells
Baseline (week 0)
Number of IFN-gamma/ Granzyme B producing CD8 T cells
Time Frame: Week 1
Number and activation status of peripheral CD8+ T cells
Week 1
Number of IFN-gamma/ Granzyme B producing CD8 T cells
Time Frame: Week 2
Number and activation status of peripheral CD8+ T cells
Week 2
Number of IFN-gamma/ Granzyme B producing CD8 T cells
Time Frame: Week 3
Number and activation status of peripheral CD8+ T cells
Week 3
Number of IFN-gamma/ Granzyme B producing CD8 T cells
Time Frame: Week 6
Number and activation status of peripheral CD8+ T cells
Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
CD4/CD8 ratio in peripheral blood
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
CD4/CD8 ratio in peripheral blood
Time Frame: Week 1
Week 1
CD4/CD8 ratio in peripheral blood
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
CD4/CD8 ratio in peripheral blood
Time Frame: Week 3
Week 3
CD4/CD8 ratio in peripheral blood
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
number of regulatory T cells
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
number of regulatory T cells
Time Frame: Week 1
Week 1
number of regulatory T cells
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
number of regulatory T cells
Time Frame: Week 3
Week 3
number of regulatory T cells
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Activation marker expression on T cells
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Activation marker expression on T cells
Time Frame: Week 1
Week 1
Activation marker expression on T cells
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
Activation marker expression on T cells
Time Frame: Week 3
Week 3
Activation marker expression on T cells
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

July 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Subscribe