Fibular Fixation in Ankle Fractures:Plate Verses Nail.

August 27, 2019 updated by: Paula J. Harriott, Orlando Health, Inc.

Fibular Fixation in Ankle Fractures: a Randomized-Controlled Trial Comparing Plating Versus Intramedullary Nailing

The primary objective of this study will be to evaluate the functional outcome of patients who present with a distal fibula fracture who were treated with either intermedullary nail (IMN) fixation or plate fixation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study will be to evaluate the functional outcome of patients who present with a distal fibula fracture who were treated with either intermedullary nail (IMN) fixation or plate fixation. This objective will be accomplished using the Olerud-Molander score, a commonly accepted functional outcome score used to evaluate patients post-operatively who have undergone foot and ankle procedures. It is a survey that evaluates patient reported outcomes including pain, stiffness, swelling, stair climbing, running, jumping, squatting, use of supports, and work/activities of daily living (ADL) level. It does not involve physician-measured outcomes. The best possible score is a total of 100. Patients will be given a form to complete throughout follow-up and be utilized for data analysis. Functional outcome will be analyzed with regards to type of fracture, gender, cause of fracture, and affected side to determine if these factors are responsible for any difference.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Orlando Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Distal fibula fracture
  • Pilon fractures
  • Open fractures
  • Ipsilateral foot

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Weber A distal fibula fractures
  • Pathologic fractures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Open reduction internal fixation(ORIF)
This surgical intervention is performed using a plate and screws.Under general anesthesia, an incision is made at the site of the break or injury, and the fracture is carefully re-aligned . The plate and screws are installed, and the incision is closed with staples or stitches. Synthes and Stryker plate and screws will be used.
An incision is made at the site of the break or injury, and the fracture is carefully re-aligned . The plate and screws are installed, and the incision is closed with staples or stitches. Synthes and Stryker plate and screws will be used.
Other Names:
  • ORIF
Active Comparator: Intermedullary (IM) Nail
This surgical intervention is performed using an intermedullary nail. Under general anesthesia, an incision is made at the site of the break or injury, and the fracture is carefully reduced. The nail in inserted through the medullary canal after proper imaging for accurate placement. The incision is closed with staples or stitches. Acumed fibula nail will be used.
An incision is made at the site of the break or injury, and the fracture is carefully reduced. The nail in inserted through the medullary canal after proper imaging for accurate placement. The incision is closed with staples or stitches. Acumed fibula nail will be used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcome using the Olerud-Molander score.
Time Frame: One year.
The Olerud-Molander score is as assessment of symptoms after ankle fracture.
One year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kenneth J. Koval, MD, Orlando Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 23, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15.037.04.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Fibula Fracture

Clinical Trials on Open reduction internal fixation

Subscribe