Effects of Yoga on Parkinson's Disease (HYPD)

May 30, 2018 updated by: University of Minnesota

Effects of Yoga on Redox Status, Motor Function and Psychosocial Well-being in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease

The study's purpose is to assess the effect of yoga on measures of oxidative stress (i.e. reduction-oxidation [redox] status); motor function; and psychosocial well-being, and the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a Hatha yoga program in PD subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The specific aims of this study are:

Aim 1: Determine the effect of a 12-week Hatha yoga program on redox status in individuals with PD.

Hypothesis 1a: Participants in the intervention group will have greater increases in total GSH levels and GSH: GSSG ratios from baseline than participants in the wait-list control group.

Hypothesis 1b: Compared to pre-intervention, wait-list participants will have higher total GSH levels and GSH: GSSG ratios after receiving the intervention.

Aim 2: Examine the effect of a 12-week Hatha yoga program on motor function (gait, balance, strength, flexibility, and physical activity level) and psychosocial well-being (mood, cognitive function, sleep quality, QoL) in individuals with PD.

Hypothesis 2a: Participants in the intervention group will have greater improved scores on the motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), range of motion (ROM), biomechanical force platforms tests, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS), Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQUALIF), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment than wait-list participants.

Hypothesis 2b: Compared to pre-intervention, wait-list participants will have improved scores on the motor UPDRS, ROM, biomechanical force platforms tests, BDI, PDSS, and PDQUALIF after receiving the intervention.

Aim 3: Determine the feasibility and acceptability of Hatha yoga program for PD subjects, and fidelity of the yoga program.

Hypothesis 3: The program retention rate will be > 70%, the average attendance rate will be > 70% per class, and no yoga related adverse events will be reported during the study. Most participants will react positively to the yoga program.

Methods Design and Sample A randomized controlled trial design with two groups will be used: a treatment group (n=10) and a wait-list control group (n=10). After randomization, participants in the treatment group will receive 60-minute biweekly Hatha yoga for 12 weeks, and participants in the wait-list group will receive no intervention. Wait-list participants will also serve as their own control and receive the same yoga intervention at the end of 12 weeks when the treatment group completed their program. Participants will be recruited from clinics via flyers, and through local and national PD networks.

Yoga programs that were used in previous PD studies will be incorporated into the design of the proposed intervention program. 19, 31, 32 Two yoga experts who are specialized in musculoskeletal/neurological disorders will review the program. The yoga intervention classes will be taught by a Registered Yoga Teacher. Classes will be held at a community center in St. Louis Park.

Resting blood samples will be collected at the Clinical Translational Science Institute (CTSI) facility by a trained phlebotomist and total GSH and redox status analyzed by a co-investigator. Biomechanical assessment and survey data will be collected in the Konczak laboratory by a trained graduate research assistant. All data will be collected at baseline and 12 weeks from both treatment and wait-list control groups. The 12 weeks data from the wait-list participants will serve as their second baseline before they began the intervention program. Their post intervention data will be collected at 24 weeks post randomization to increase power.

Study Endpoints:

  1. Primary endpoint: redox status at 12 weeks.
  2. Secondary endpoint: motor function (gait, balance, strength, flexibility, physical activity level) and psychosocial well-being (mood, cognitive function, sleep quality, QoL) at 12 weeks.
  3. Tertiary endpoint: yoga feasibility, acceptability, and program fidelity. The sample size of 20, with attrition rate of 20%, has 78% power to detect an effect size of 1.0 when comparing the change before and after the yoga intervention. Both between groups and within group comparisons will be conducted. Descriptive statistics will be used to analyze and report demographic, feasibility, and acceptability data. Inferential statistics (t-test or non-parametric equivalent such as Mann-Whitney, and chi-square test) will be used to analyze the objective and subjective outcomes of Aims 1 & 2. The α level will be set at ≤ .05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with idiopathic PD;
  • On optimized dopaminergic therapy for 4 weeks prior to enrollment; and
  • Have not practiced any form of yoga regularly (more than 2 days a week) in the past 6 months; and
  • Not currently participating in a supervised exercise program more than 2 days a week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atypical Parkinsonism or other significant brain conditions such as a stroke;
  • Fell more than once in the past 3 months;
  • Moderate to severe cognitive impairment (scored <26) as indicated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment;
  • Decline in immune function such as pneumonia or systemic infection;
  • Spinal fusion or other orthopedic surgery in the past 6 months;
  • Unstable cardiovascular conditions;
  • Significant mental disease or psychosis;
  • Not able to ambulate 6 meters steadily without assistive device.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Immediate treatment
Participants who are randomly assigned to the immediate treatment group will receive 60-minute biweekly Hatha yoga for 12 weeks.
Yoga programs that were used in previous PD studies will be incorporated into the design of the proposed intervention program. Two yoga experts who are specialized in musculoskeletal/neurological disorders will review the program. The yoga intervention classes will be taught by a Registered Yoga Teacher. The 60 minute long yoga session will be held twice a week for 12 weeks at a community center in St. Louis Park.
Other Names:
  • Yoga
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Waitlist control
Participants who are randomly assigned to the wait-list group will receive no intervention during the first 12 weeks. Not only will they serve as the comparative group, they will also serve as their own control and receive the same yoga intervention at the end of 12 weeks when the immediate treatment group completed their program.
Yoga programs that were used in previous PD studies will be incorporated into the design of the proposed intervention program. Two yoga experts who are specialized in musculoskeletal/neurological disorders will review the program. The yoga intervention classes will be taught by a Registered Yoga Teacher. The 60 minute long yoga session will be held twice a week for 12 weeks at a community center in St. Louis Park.
Other Names:
  • Yoga

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Redox status
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The antioxidant glutathione (GSH) and the GSH: glutathione disulfide (GSSG) ratio will be measured at baseline and at the end of the program.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor function
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Gait and strength will be measured using motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) biomechanical force platforms tests: Force plate system (OR6-5 AMTI) - 2D sway path length of center of mass during 20s standing.
12 weeks
Motor function
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Balance will be measured using the motor UPDRS and biomechanical force platforms tests: Force plate system (OR6-5 AMTI) - range of anterior-posterior and medial-lateral away, total sway area, and duration of one-legged stance.
12 weeks
Motor function
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Flexibility will be evaluated by measuring range of motion using a goniometer.
12 weeks
Cognitive function
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Cognitive function will be evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test.
12 weeks
Mood
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Mood will be evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory scale.
12 weeks
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Sleep quality will be evaluated using the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale.
12 weeks
Physical activity level
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam scale will be used to evaluate physical activity levels in PD subjects.
12 weeks
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire will be used.
12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Yoga feasibility
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Number of eligible subjects, total average number of class attendance, number and type of yoga related adverse events, and retention rate.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Yoga acceptability
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A short questionnaire will be used to evaluate participants' self-report satisfaction with the yoga program, perceived appropriateness of the program, and intention to continue use of the program.
12 weeks
Yoga program fidelity
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
The PI will evaluate the accuracy/consistency of the intervention program.
4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 28, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Hatha yoga

3
Subscribe