MIGS VS SLT Comparison in Glaucoma Patients

July 29, 2015 updated by: Antonio Fea, University of Turin, Italy

MIGS VS SLT in Glaucoma Patients: Prospective Study

To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of glaucoma medications lowering of microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) with the implantation of the trabecular device Hydrus (Ivantis) as a solo procedure and 360° selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) to treat primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Eligible study patients diagnosed with POAG and not sufficiently controlled by, intolerant of, or non-compliant with their current IOP-lowering regimen. Patients with IOP>21 mm Hg upon at least two consecutive measurements. Study subjects with typical glaucomatous visual field (VF) loss on Octopus or Humphrey automated perimetry (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) and glaucomatous alterations to the optic nerve head. Visual field classified as glaucomatous according to the European Glaucoma Society guidelines.

Exclusion criteria : eye surgery in the previous 6 months, any previous surgery for glaucoma, evidence of glaucoma of a type other than POAG, and medication with systemic or topical steroids.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Turin, Italy, 10138
        • Ophthalmology Institute, University of Turin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary open angle glaucoma diagnosis, intolerant or unresponsive to therapy or not controlled with therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • eye surgery in the previous 6 months, any previous surgery for glaucoma, evidence of glaucoma of a type other than POAG, and medication with systemic or topical steroids

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MIGS Hydrus Ivantis
opening the anterior chamber (2mm.) injecting visco-material, injecting the Hydrus stent in the Schlemm's canal under gonioscopic control
implant of the micro stent in the nasal Schlemm's canal
Experimental: SLT
Laser Solutis SLT laser (Quantel Medical, Clermont-Ferrand, France): this frequency-doubled, Q-switched Nd:YAG laser emits light at a wavelength of 532 nm, with a pulse duration of 4 ns, a spot size of 400 µm and pulse energy ranging from 0.2 to 2 mJ
Laser Solutis SLT laser (Quantel Medical, Clermont-Ferrand, France): this frequency-doubled, Q-switched Nd:YAG laser emits light at a wavelength of 532 nm, with a pulse duration of 4 ns, a spot size of 400 µm and pulse energy ranging from 0.2 to 2 mJ

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in the intraocular pressure compared to baseline
Time Frame: up to 12 months
measurement with GAT in mm Hg
up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in the number of glaucoma medications compared to baseline
Time Frame: up to 12 months
accountability of IOP lowering medications used by the patient
up to 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change of visual acuity compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 months and 1 year post-intervention
ETDRS visual acuity scale
6 months and 1 year post-intervention
change of visual field compared to baseline
Time Frame: 1 year post-intervention
MD and PSD
1 year post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Fea, MD, Clinica Oculistica

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1 (Other Identifier: Mobile Health and Wellness Program)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on MIGS Hydrus Ivantis

Subscribe