Pilot Study of Physiological Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Respiratory Pattern and Work of Breathing

May 4, 2022 updated by: Tufts Medical Center

Pilot Study of Physiological Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Respiratory Pattern and Work of Breathing in Severe COPD Patients

Patients affected with severe parenchymal pulmonary diseases, such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD ), may experience dyspnea at rest due to increased work of breathing and reduced oxygenation. The delivery of high-flow humidified nasal oxygen (HFNC) has been shown to have a positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) effect and is able to flush out CO2 from the upper airways, reducing dead space ventilation. Furthermore it has been proven to reduce the respiratory rate shortly after its initiation. These multiple actions offer the potential of changing the respiratory pattern and reducing work of breathing, improving the efficiency of breathing.

In this short-term, physiological, open, randomized, cross-over pilot study the investigator swill describe the effects of varying settings of high-flow nasal oxygen on respiratory rate, tidal volume, and diaphragmatic work of breathing in patients with severe COPD. The investigators will also describe changes in gas exchange and effects on the subjects' comfort and dyspnea and the breathing responses to varying setting of CPAP in the subject population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

HFNC has been shown to have many advantages in the treatment of acutely hypoxemic patients, improving their clinical outcome. The exact mechanism underlying this beneficial effect is still not completely understood. Few studies have analyzed the effect of HFNC on ventilatory pattern and work of breathing. The majority of these studies have focused on the effects in healthy volunteers. Only one study from Braunlich et al. studied the effects of HFNC on COPD and interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients, showing that high-flow nasal oxygen reduces respiratory rate and increases the tidal volume in these patients.

In adults, a low flow range from 5 to 10 L/min is comparable to flow received by standard oxygen devices (nasal cannula or facial mask). Patients with underlying pulmonary diseases, as in our study population, have a higher inspiratory flow demands range (from 30 to 120 L/min during an acute respiratory failure episode) compared to healthy subjects.

We expect to observe physiological changes in our outcomes with the proposed Optiflow ™ settings of a minimal therapeutic flow of 30 L/min, intermediate of 45 L/min, and the maximal flow rate of 60 L/min. There is an extensive clinical experience using high flow rates in these ranges and they are generally very well tolerated. As mentioned above, HFNC generates a Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) comparable to CPAP range of 4 - 8 cmH2O (the minimal and the maximal PEEP generated by the HFNC).

Future studies, based on this pilot study, will differ from previous ones in the following ways:

  1. We are testing a different technology. The Optiflow delivers substantially higher flow rates than in the previous Braunlich study13.That study used a single flow rate of 24 L/min whereas we are examining a range of flows that extend considerably higher (30 to 60L/min). We are interested in determining how the effects of higher flow rates compare to those in the range used in the Braunlich study, but we are not able to compare the devices directly because the latter device is not available in the US. It is important to understand whether there is any efficacy advantage to using the higher flow rates available with the Optiflow.
  2. Future studies will aim to understand mechanisms of the effect of high flow nasal oxygen.

    1. Are the effects that we anticipate seeing related to changes in inspiratory muscle effort as determined by measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure and calculation of the pressure time product of the diaphragm?
    2. Or does the flushing of dead space in the nasopharynx improve ventilatory efficiency so that gas exchange can remain stable or even improve (as determined by measurements of minute volume and transcutaneous PCO2 (PtcCO2)? This has implications for use of HFNC to treat patients with COPD exacerbations who are developing respiratory muscle fatigue.

1) Our focus will be on COPD patients for whom the use of HFNC has not been studied much to date. Most studies have focused on patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. It is important to understand how HFNC affects breathing pattern and gas exchange in COPD patients because earlier reports suggest that excessive concentrations of oxygen administered to COPD patients retaining CO2 can actually worsen the CO2 retention by blunting respiratory drive. The reduction in respiratory rate and minute volume noted by Braunlich et al could represent a blunting effect of O2 on drive to breathe and could promote greater CO2 retention. By monitoring PCO2, something the Braunlich study didn't do, we can assess this possibility.

2) We wish to evaluate the effect of CPAP on the same breathing indices as with HFNC in our COPD patients. We plan to use the CPAP response as a "positive control", to determine if our population responds as described by CPAP studies in the literature. Prior studies have demonstrated that in patients with severe COPD, using CPAP in the range we are proposing, lowers the diaphragmatic work of breathing and we wish to determine if our population manifests a similar effect.

Thus future studies, based on the data obtained from this pilot study, will extend the Braunlich et al study by evaluating the effects of higher flow rates using a different technology available in the US, determining effects on inspiratory muscle effort, and monitoring gas exchange which is important from both mechanistic and safety perspectives. We hypothesize that the higher flow rates will have a greater blunting effect on breathing pattern than a low flow rate and that there will be an improvement in ventilator efficiency that will be associated with decreased breathing work of the diaphragm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02116
        • Tufts Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects are 18 or more years of age
  • Chronic respiratory failure, defined as indication for long-term oxygen therapy
  • Underlying diagnosis of severe COPD (GOLD stage III or IV)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent (<1 month) exacerbation Acute exacerbation is defined as a sudden worsening of COPD symptoms (shortness of breath, quantity and color of phlegm) requiring a change in the baseline therapy.
  • Respiratory rate at rest >28/min
  • Subject requires > 6 L/min nasal O2 to maintain SpO2 >88% at rest
  • Subject has severe dyspnea at rest
  • Subject has swallowing disorder or chronic aspiration
  • Prior esophageal surgery, known esophageal stricture or any other condition that would place the subject at risk during balloon placement
  • Recent (< 1 month) abdominal and thoracic surgery
  • Severe coagulopathy (defined as platelet count <5000/μL or international normalised ratio >4)
  • Subject is too cognitively impaired to give subjective ratings for visual analogue scale.The PI and the Co-Investigators will assess the patient cognition using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
  • Allergy or sensitivity to lidocaine
  • Inability to obtain informed consent
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High-flow humidified nasal oxygen delivery system
We will describe effects of varying settings of high-flow nasal oxygen (10-30-45-60 L/min) on respiratory rate, tidal volume, and diaphragmatic work of breathing in patients with severe COPD. We will also describe changes in gas exchange and effects on the subjects' comfort and dyspnea. This will be measured using, esophageal and gastric balloons, respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) system, and Sentec transcutaneous monitoring system.
Esophageal and gastric pressures will be measured with an esophageal ballon positioned at the lower third of the esophagus, filled with 0.5 mL of air and a gastric balloon filled with 1 mL of air. The proper position of balloons will be verified using the occlusion test as previously described. Transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) is calculated as the difference between gastric (Pga) and esophageal (Pes) pressure. The pressure time integrals of the diaphragm and the other inspiratory muscles are calculated per breath (PTPdi/b and PTPes/b, respectively) and per minute (PTPdi/min and PTPes/min). Measurements will be collected at baseline, at each randomized HFNC and CPAP settings during the last 4 minutes of each 10 minutes session.
Inspiratory tidal volume (VTi), respiratory rate (RR), breath duration (Ttot), inspiratory time (Ti) and fractional inspiratory time (Ti/Ttot) will be determined using a Respiratory Inductive Plethysmography (RIP) system. This will measure the thoracic and abdominal excursion of the subjects via two inductive wires which are sewn into the elastic bands that encircle the thorax and abdomen. The acquired signals represent changes in cross-sectional area and, following calibration to determine the relative contribution of each signal, and volume calibration using spirometry, their weighted sum will reflect VTi. The RIP companion software will be used to derive RR, Ttot, Ti and Ti/Ttot on a breath by breath basis.
The oxygenation, the level of carbon dioxide, and the heart rate will be recorded using the Sentec transcutaneous monitoring system: a probe will be placed at the earlobe or on the forehead, and it will measure in a noninvasive way these parameters.
Active Comparator: CPAP (Positive Control)
We want to describe the breathing responses to varying setting of CPAP in the subject population. We plan to use the CPAP response as a "positive control", to determine if our population responds as described by CPAP studies in the literature. This will be measured using, esophageal and gastric balloons, respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) system, and Sentec transcutaneous monitoring system.
Esophageal and gastric pressures will be measured with an esophageal ballon positioned at the lower third of the esophagus, filled with 0.5 mL of air and a gastric balloon filled with 1 mL of air. The proper position of balloons will be verified using the occlusion test as previously described. Transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) is calculated as the difference between gastric (Pga) and esophageal (Pes) pressure. The pressure time integrals of the diaphragm and the other inspiratory muscles are calculated per breath (PTPdi/b and PTPes/b, respectively) and per minute (PTPdi/min and PTPes/min). Measurements will be collected at baseline, at each randomized HFNC and CPAP settings during the last 4 minutes of each 10 minutes session.
Inspiratory tidal volume (VTi), respiratory rate (RR), breath duration (Ttot), inspiratory time (Ti) and fractional inspiratory time (Ti/Ttot) will be determined using a Respiratory Inductive Plethysmography (RIP) system. This will measure the thoracic and abdominal excursion of the subjects via two inductive wires which are sewn into the elastic bands that encircle the thorax and abdomen. The acquired signals represent changes in cross-sectional area and, following calibration to determine the relative contribution of each signal, and volume calibration using spirometry, their weighted sum will reflect VTi. The RIP companion software will be used to derive RR, Ttot, Ti and Ti/Ttot on a breath by breath basis.
The oxygenation, the level of carbon dioxide, and the heart rate will be recorded using the Sentec transcutaneous monitoring system: a probe will be placed at the earlobe or on the forehead, and it will measure in a noninvasive way these parameters.
Other Names:
  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
respiratory rate
Time Frame: 90 minutes
respiratory rate (RR) will be determined using a Respiratory Inductive Plethysmography (RIP) system. This will measure the thoracic and abdominal excursion of the subjects via two inductive wires which are sewn into the elastic bands that encircle the thorax and abdomen. The acquired signals represent changes in cross-sectional area and, following calibration to determine the relative contribution of each signal, and volume calibration using spirometry, their weighted sum will reflect VTi. The RIP companion software will be used to derive RR. It will be expressed as breaths per minute
90 minutes
tidal volume
Time Frame: 90 minutes
Inspiratory tidal volume (VTi) will be determined using a Respiratory Inductive Plethysmography (RIP) system. This will measure the thoracic and abdominal excursion of the subjects via two inductive wires which are sewn into the elastic bands that encircle the thorax and abdomen. The acquired signals represent changes in cross-sectional area and, following calibration to determine the relative contribution of each signal, and volume calibration using spirometry, their weighted sum will reflect VTi (mL).
90 minutes
diaphragmatic work of breathing
Time Frame: 90 minutes
Esophageal and gastric pressures will be measured with an esophageal ballon positioned at the lower third of the esophagus, filled with 0.5 mL of air and a gastric balloon filled with 1 mL of air. Transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) is calculated as the difference between gastric (Pga) and esophageal (Pes) pressure. The pressure time integrals of the diaphragm and the other inspiratory muscles are calculated per breath (PTPdi/b and PTPes/b, respectively) and per minute (PTPdi/min and PTPes/min). Measurements will be collected at baseline, at each randomized HFNC and CPAP settings during the last 4 minutes of each 10 minutes session.
90 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes in gas exchange
Time Frame: 90 minutes
The oxygenation and the level of carbon dioxide will be recorded using the Sentec transcutaneous monitoring system: a probe will be placed at the earlobe or on the forehead, and it will measure in a noninvasive way these parameters.
90 minutes
effects on the subjects' comfort
Time Frame: 90 minutes
Subject comfort during each setting will be evaluated using a Numeric rating scale (NRS). The subjects will be asked by the investigator to answer the following question: "How do you feel your comfort is at this moment?''. For each condition tested, the subject places a finger on the number that best represents their level of breathing comfort (from 0 to 10)
90 minutes
effects on the subjects' dyspnea
Time Frame: 90 minutes
Subject breathing during each setting will be evaluated using a Numeric rating scale (NRS). The subjects will be asked by the investigator to answer the following question: "How do you feel your breathing is at this moment?''. For each condition tested, the subject places a finger on the number that best represents their level of breathing comfort (from 0 to 10)
90 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-11570

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD

Clinical Trials on Esophageal and gastric balloons

Subscribe