Mobile Otoscopy - Efficacy of Residents to Diagnose Acute Otitis Media Using a Smartphone Otoscope Attachment (MOTO)

October 12, 2016 updated by: Jocelyn Gravel, St. Justine's Hospital

Mobile Otoscopy - Efficacy of Residents to Diagnose Acute Otitis Media Using a Smartphone Otoscope Attachment: A Randomized Controlled Trials

To evaluate the residents' efficacy in diagnosing acute otitis media among febrile children presenting with respiratory symptoms using a smartphone otoscope attachment compared with a classic otoscope.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: Acute otitis media (AOM) is one of the most common diseases of childhood and a leading cause for health care consultations. While otoscope is the tool traditionally used to diagnose AOM, otoscopic diagnostic skills of both trainees and practitioners appear to be limited. Therefore, new diagnostic methods are continuously developed. One of those devices is a smartphone otoscope attachment called CellScope Oto, a portable video-otoscope that allows residents and staff to share diagnostic-quality images.

Objective: To evaluate the residents' efficacy in diagnosing acute otitis media among febrile children presenting with respiratory symptoms using a smartphone otoscope attachment compared with a classic otoscope.

Methods: This will be a randomized controlled trial evaluating accuracy of evaluation of ears of children visiting the emergency department (ED) for suspected AOM by residents using the CellScope Oto in comparison to a classic otoscope. It will be performed at a single pediatric ED in a tertiary care Hospital. Participants will be children between 1 and 5 years of age presenting with fever and respiratory symptoms. Baselines characteristics of participants will be assessed. Participating residents will be taught how to use the CellScope Oto and will practice with a few patients before being ready to participate in the study. Eligible patients will be recruited during weekdays. If the parents consent, patients will first be evaluated by a staff Pediatric Otolaryngologist using a binocular microscope (gold standard). They will then be evaluated by two participating residents, one using the intervention method and one using the control. Randomization will be used to decide which visualisation method will be used first. After all three exams have been performed, the residents, patients' parent and staff in charge will each be asked to answer a short questionnaire about final diagnosis and confidence in the performed exam, favourite method and the need for a control exam. These questionnaires will be reviewed by a reviewer blinded to the randomization. The primary outcome measure will be the accuracy of AOM diagnosis made by the residents compared with the diagnosis made by a staff Pediatric Otolaryngologist using a binocular microscope. A sample size of 100 participants evaluated twice would provide a power of 80% and an alpha value of 0,05 to demonstrate a difference of 15% in the rate of appropriate diagnosis of AOM by residents using a smartphone otoscope attachment compared with classic otoscope use.

Expected results: The investigators expect to demonstrate a 15% increase in the efficacy rate of AOM diagnosis by residents registered to a paediatrics-related program using a smartphone otoscope attachment compared with a classic otoscope. This device has the potential to change current AOM diagnostic practice and might, in turn, provide a reduced amount of prescriptions made every year for antibiotics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T1C5
        • Sainte-Justine Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 4 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Visiting the ED for fever and respiratory problems
  • During the hours when there is a research assistant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anterior myringotomy with tube placement
  • Signs of serious infection (triage priority 1 or 2, tachycardia and/or hypotension, bulging fontanelle, neck stiffness, purpuric rash, altered consciousness)
  • Impossibility to obtain an informed consent by the parent (absence of parent, language barrier, etc)
  • Severe chronic illness (immunodeficiency, congenital heart disease, encephalopathy, pulmonary disease other than asthma, and disorder of the ear, nose and throat)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Cellscope
The intervention for this study will be the use of a smartphone otoscope attachment called CellScope Oto.
The CellScope Oto, is a portable video-otoscope that allows residents and staff to share diagnostic-quality images
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Traditional otoscope
The control group will be using a classic otoscope
Use of a regular otoscope

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
accuracy in diagnosing acute otitis media
Time Frame: 15 minutes
This will be the number of participants for which there will be a complete agreement between the evaluation of the resident and the diagnosis of acute otitis media as diagnosed by the Pediatric Otolaryngologist using binocular microscope.
15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need for second exam
Time Frame: 15 minutes
The number of participants for which the staff in charge will have to repeat the exam
15 minutes
Parents satisfaction
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The parents' satisfaction regarding the ear exam performed on their child using a likert scale
30 minutes
Confidence
Time Frame: 15 minutes
the confidence of participants in their ear exams using a likert scale
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jocelyn Gravel, MD, MSc, St. Justine's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MOTO study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Otitis Media

Clinical Trials on Cellscope

3
Subscribe