Evaluation of Cellphone Based Otoscopy in Pediatric Patients

August 24, 2021 updated by: Johns Hopkins University
The Cellscope is an iPhone-based otoscope that uses the iPhone camera and light source to capture HIPAA compliant images and video recordings of the external and middle ear structure. This technology allows multiple providers, at different levels of training, the ability to simultaneously exam a child's external and middle ear structures. The investigators hypothesize this device will result in improved concordance in trainee/supervisor exam findings, increase trainee confidence in exam findings, decreased antibiotic prescriptions, and fewer repeat exams by multiple providers. Thus, this study has the potential to improve physician training and examination confidence, decrease the unnecessary use of antibiotics, and improve the patient/caregiver experience in healthcare interactions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Abstract

Concerns about middle and external ear infections and discomfort are frequent chief complaints that bring children to pediatric providers. On top of this, there are numerous non-ear complaints (e.g. head trauma) that warrant a complete evaluation of the middle and external ear structures. At present, the middle and external ear is examined with standard direct otoscopy, commonly using a handheld otoscope. Otoscopy is defined as the visualization of the external and middle ear structures, including the tympanic membrane, ossicles, middle ear fluid, ear canal, etc. The skill of otoscopy is taught early in the medical trainees' career, most often in the first or second year of medical school. This skill is further honed during the pediatric medical student clerkship and pediatric residency, however there is not an efficient and patient-centered mechanism for direct visualization and teaching of trainees. Because of this, it is nearly impossible for trainees to receive feedback on trainees' visualization and interpretation skills. Based on the investigators' experience, trainee exams are often not repeated by clinical supervisors as the trainees progress in training. When supervisors do repeat ear exams (i.e., trainee is uncertain of findings), it is challenging to determine if the trainee fully appreciates exam findings. Ear exam findings directly inform the clinical decision-making (e.g., prescribing antibiotics for acute otitis media (AOM)) and uncertainty often results in unnecessary prescribing.

Objectives

Aim 1: To establish whether a smartphone otoscope improves diagnostic accuracy of tympanic membrane (TM) pathology for trainees, compared to supervisor.

Aim 2: To determine whether smartphone otoscope improves diagnostic confidence of trainees, thereby reducing frequency of antibiotic prescriptions for AOM.

Aim 3: To determine whether there is a change in repeat exam rates by supervisors, comparing with/without Cellscope.

Aim 4: To determine whether trainees convert to traditional otoscope use during the weeks that Cellscope is available.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

197

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21212
        • Johns Hopkins Children's Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All trainees and supervisors
  • All patients where otoscopy would traditionally be indicated, at the discretion of the clinical team

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Traditional Otoscope
Pediatric trainees use a traditional otoscope to evaluate pediatric patient ears. Trainees' supervisors will also evaluate patients with the traditional otoscope. The study evaluates concordance of the exams.
Experimental: Cellscope
Pediatric trainees use a cellphone otoscope (Cellscope) to evaluate pediatric patient ears. Trainees' supervisors will evaluate patients remotely with the video on the cellphone otoscope. The study evaluates concordance of the exams.
Cellphone otoscope (Cellscope) to evaluate pediatric patient ears.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concordance of Trainee and Supervisor Utilizing the OMgrade Scale as Assessed by the Concordance-statistic
Time Frame: 6 months
Concordance of trainee and supervisor utilizing the OMgrade scale, between traditional otoscope and cellscope. Concordance is determined by the concordance-statistic (0-1) in a logistic regression model. The closer the number is to 1 the higher the concordance.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interrater Reliability as Assessed by a Kappa Statistic
Time Frame: 6 months
Kappa statistic (Fleiss' Kappa) of trainee and supervisor utilizing the OMgrade scale. The kappa statistic ranges from 0-1. The closer the number is to 1 the higher the agreement.
6 months
Number of Patients Who Receive Antibiotics
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of patients who receive antibiotics between traditional otoscope and cellscope.
6 months
Number of Participants Who Receive a Repeat Examination
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of participants who receive a repeat examination between traditional otoscope and cellscope.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Therese Canares, MD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Otitis Media

Clinical Trials on Cellscope

Subscribe