Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Slow Transit Constipation

November 3, 2016 updated by: Jianfeng Gong, Jinling Hospital, China

A Randomized Controlled Study of Efficacy, Safety and Durability of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Adult Patients With Slow Transit Constipation

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of fecal microbiota transplantation in adults with slow transit constipation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Constipation is a chronic disease estimated to affect about 10% - 15% of the worldwide general population. Constipation frequency appears to augment with increasing age, particularly after 65 years old.

Recent evidence in the literature and collected in the investigators' laboratory confirm that constipation can be a consequence of intestinal dysbiosis, with an increase of potentially pathogenic microorganisms and a decrease of potentially beneficial microorganisms. These alterations may affect the motility and metabolic environment of colon, especially the production of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs).

A new and under-explored method to manipulate the gastrointestinal microbiota involves fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). There has been growing interest in the use of fecal microbiota for the treatment of patients with chronic gastrointestinal infections (e.g. CDI) and other extraintestinal conditions (e.g. IBD). Similarly, the investigators suppose that reshaping the gut microbiome with FMT would be effective for patients with slow transit constipation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210002
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Generay Surgery, Jinling hosptal, Medical School of Nanjing University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic constipation according to Rome III criteria, defined as two or fewer spontaneous, complete bowel movements (SCBMs) per week for a minimum of 6 months;
  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • BMI: 18.5-25 kg/m2;
  • Slow colonic transit confirmed by colonic transit test (colonic transit time (CTT) > 48 hours);
  • Normal anorectal manometry, with no evidence of dyssynergia and confirmed ability to expel rectal balloon;
  • No radiographic evidence of functional (i.e. pelvic floor dyssynergia) or anatomical (i.e. significant rectocele and intussusception) impediment to the expulsion of the radio-opaque contrast;
  • Disease duration > 1 year;
  • Traditional treatment with dietary modification, laxatives (including osmotic and stimulant laxatives), and biofeedback tried over the past 6 months without success;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bowel constipation due to innate factor (i.e. megacolon) or secondary interventions (i.e. drugs, endocrine, metabolic, neurologic or psychologic disorders);
  • History or evidence of gastrointestinal diseases (i.e. obstruction, cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases) ;
  • Previous abdominal surgery, except cholecystectomy, appendicectomy, tubal ligation and cesarean section;
  • Previous proctological or perianal surgery;
  • A constipation condition meeting the Rome III criteria for IBS or functional abdominal pain syndrome;
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women;
  • Infection with enteric pathogen;
  • Usage of probiotics, prebiotics and/or synbiotics within the last month;
  • Usage of antibiotics and/or PPIs within the last 3 months;
  • Smoking or alcohol addiction within the last 3 months;
  • Uncontrolled hepatic, renal, cardiovascular, respiratory or psychiatric disease;
  • Disease or therapy with drugs (i.e. antidepressants, opioid narcotic analgesics, anticholinergics, calcium antagonists, nitrates, antimuscarinics) that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect intestinal transit and microbiota.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)
On day 1-6, patients received 100ml fresh FMT by nasointestinal tube, once per day. The nasointestinal tube was placed in the patient's proximal jejunum through endoscopy. Then, donor fecal microbiota was infused within 5 minutes through nasointestinal tube.
Standardized Frozen Fecal Microbiota will be infused via nasointestinal tube.
Other Names:
  • Fecal bacteriotherapy
Conventional treatment was taken by both of two groups. If patients did not have a bowel movement for 3 or more consecutive days, they were permitted to take up to 20 g of Macrogol 4000 powder (Forlax®, Ipsen, Paris, France). If ineffective, an enema could be used.
Experimental: Conventional treatment
Conventional treatment was taken by both of two groups. If patients did not have a bowel movement for 3 or more consecutive days, they were permitted to take up to 20 g of Macrogol 4000 powder (Forlax®, Ipsen, Paris, France). If ineffective, an enema could be used.
Standardized Frozen Fecal Microbiota will be infused via nasointestinal tube.
Other Names:
  • Fecal bacteriotherapy
Conventional treatment was taken by both of two groups. If patients did not have a bowel movement for 3 or more consecutive days, they were permitted to take up to 20 g of Macrogol 4000 powder (Forlax®, Ipsen, Paris, France). If ineffective, an enema could be used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients having on average three or more SCBMs/week
Time Frame: 3 months
Proportion of patients having on average three or more spontaneous, complete bowel movements (SCBMs) per week was evaluated at week 4 and 12.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean number of bowel movements per week
Time Frame: 3 months
Patients kept daily diaries about times of bowel movements each day.
3 months
Characteristics of bowel movements
Time Frame: 3 months
Patients kept daily diaries about stool consistency and degree of straining severity during defecation.
3 months
Constipation-related symptoms assessments
Time Frame: 3 months
Constipation-related symptoms were evaluated using the validated Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) questionnaire at week 4 and 12.
3 months
Quality-of-Life assessments
Time Frame: 3 months
Quality-of-Life was evaluated using the validated Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) self-report questionnaire at week 4 and 12.
3 months
Colonic transit time measurements
Time Frame: 3 months
Colonic transit time (CTT) was measured at week 4 and 12 with the Metcalf method.
3 months
Usage of laxatives or enemas as rescue medication
Time Frame: 3 months
If patients did not have a bowel movement for 3 or more consecutive days, they were permitted to take up to 20 g of Macrogol 4000 powder (Forlax). If ineffective, enema was used. Patients kept daily diaries about the rescue medication when used.
3 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: 3 months
Adverse events include fever, diarrhea, abdominal pain, increased bloating, borborygmi, flatulence, nausea, vomiting, nasopharyngitis, and any other disorders.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RCT-FMT-STC-2015

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Slow Transit Constipation

Clinical Trials on Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)

3
Subscribe