- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02529644
Church-based HIV Screening: Taking It to the Pews (TIPS)
August 19, 2019 updated by: Jannette Berkley-Patton, University of Missouri, Kansas City
Assessing HIV Screening in African American Churches
The primary aim of this study is to fully test a culturally/religiously-tailored, church-based HIV screening intervention (TIPS) against a standard HIV information intervention on HIV screening rates at 6 and 12 months with adult African American church members and community members who use church outreach services.
Our secondary outcome is to reduce sexual risk behaviors with this same population.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary aim of this study is to fully test a culturally/religiously-tailored, church-based HIV screening intervention against a standard HIV information intervention on HIV screening rates at 6 and 12 months with adult AA church members and community members who use church outreach services.
In this two-arm clustered, randomized community trial, churches will be matched on SES, membership size, and denomination, then randomized to treatment condition.
It is projected that 14 churches (7 churches per arm; 110 church and community members per church; 1,540 participants total) will be required to detect significant increases in HIV screening in the intervention arm.
Intervention content is guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB).
Intervention delivery will be guided by a Community Engagement and Social-Ecological approach.
This approach includes church leaders delivering culturally/religiously-appropriate HIV education and screening materials (e.g., sermon guides, HIV screening testimonials, church bulletins) and activities (e.g., pastors modeling receipt of HIV screening, HIV screening events) from a church-based HIV Tool Kit through multilevel church outlets (community-wide, church-wide services, ministry and outreach groups, individual) to increase intervention reach and dosage.
It was hypothesized that this church-based HIV screening intervention will significantly increase HIV screening rates vs a standard HIV information intervention in AA church-populations at 6 and 12 months.
The role of potential mediators and moderators related to receipt of HIV screening will be evaluated and a process evaluation to determine modifiable implementation fidelity, facilitators, barriers, and costs related to increasing church-based HIV testing rates will be conducted.
This intervention study could provide an effective, scalable model for HIV screening interventions in AA churches.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
1540
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64110
- University of Missouri-Kansas City
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 64 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All participants must be: aged 18 to 64; willing to participate in 3 surveys after church services or church outreach activities
- Willing to provide contact information (two phone numbers, mailing and email address, phone numbers for two persons with whom they have ongoing contact)
- Attend church at least once a month or use church outreach services, such as food and clothing programs, at least 4 times per year.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Minors 18 and under are intentionally excluded since the intervention study has been designed specifically for adults with information of how HIV affects the African American adult population.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Comparison (Standard Information Arm)
The comparison/standard information churches will receive standard multilevel HIV education information that is similar in type to those provided to the intervention churches.
These churches will receive: a) non-tailored project materials (videos, brochures) collected from health organizations and b) standard, non-tailored activities (e.g., community-based HIV testing events) coordinated by their church liaisons.
These churches will receive all Taking It to the Pews HIV Tool Kit materials after the completion of 12-month assessments.
|
Pastors and Health Action Team members will be trained and receive manualized pastor/church liaison trainings on study procedures, HIV basics and local resources and coordination of HIV screening events.
Comparison churches will receive: a) non-tailored project materials (videos, brochures) collected from health organizations and b) standard, non-tailored activities (e.g., community-based HIV testing events) coordinated by their church liaisons.
The comparison churches will offer 3 HIV screening events and deliver 1-2 standard materials per month for the 12 month study period.
All comparison churches will receive all Taking It to the Pews HIV Tool Kit materials after the completion of 12-month assessments.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Intervention
Taking It to the Pews (TIPS) will be delivered through church-based multilevel (community, church-wide, ministry group, interpersonal/individual) activities by trained church leaders using religiously/ culturally-tailored study materials packaged in a TIPS HIV Tool Kit and following a scripted, study implementation manual.
|
Pastors and Health Action Team members will be trained in treatment implementation procedures using the scripted, study implementation manual.
Intervention churches will receive the TIPS HIV Tool Kit, including a study manual.
These churches will hold a Kick-off event, where tools will be distributed, and motivational strategies implemented.
After the Kick-off, liaisons will deliver 1-2 Tool Kit materials/activities per month through targeted multilevel church activities minimum of 24 tools over the 12 month study period.
Two additional HIV screening events will be planned (one for community members) and will be open to all persons seeking screening, including study nonparticipants.
Both groups will receive manualized pastor/church liaison trainings on study procedures, HIV basics and local resources and coordination of HIV screening events.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported Receipt of HIV Screening
Time Frame: Baseline
|
This measure is self-reported receipt of HIV screening received in last 12 months
|
Baseline
|
|
Self-reported Receipt of HIV Screening
Time Frame: 6 months
|
This measure is self-reported receipt of HIV screening recieved in last 12 months
|
6 months
|
|
Self-reported Receipt of HIV screening
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This measure is self-reported receipt of HIV screening received in last 12 months
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
HIV Sexual Risk Behavior Score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
HIV sexual risk behavior will be assessed as a composite measure: a) if participant had vaginal, oral, or anal sex with (No=0, Yes=1); b) the number of men and the number of women they had sex with, recoded as 1 to 5 sex partners=1 and 6 or more sex partners=2; and c) how often they or partner(s)/spouse used condoms or barriers (Always=0, Usually=1, Sometimes=2, or Never=3) within last 12 months.
Higher scores indicate more sexual risk (range 0-8).
|
Baseline
|
|
HIV Sexual Risk Behavior Score
Time Frame: 6 months
|
HIV sexual risk behavior will be assessed as a composite measure: a) if participant had vaginal, oral, or anal sex with (No=0, Yes=1); b) the number of men and the number of women they had sex with, recoded as 1 to 5 sex partners=1 and 6 or more sex partners=2; and c) how often they or partner(s)/spouse used condoms or barriers (Always=0, Usually=1, Sometimes=2, or Never=3) within last 12 months.
Higher scores indicate more sexual risk (range 0-8).
|
6 months
|
|
HIV Sexual Risk Behavior Score
Time Frame: 12 months
|
HIV sexual risk behavior will be assessed as a composite measure: a) if participant had vaginal, oral, or anal sex with (No=0, Yes=1); b) the number of men and the number of women they had sex with, recoded as 1 to 5 sex partners=1 and 6 or more sex partners=2; and c) how often they or partner(s)/spouse used condoms or barriers (Always=0, Usually=1, Sometimes=2, or Never=3) within last 12 months.
Higher scores indicate more sexual risk (range 0-8).
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jannette Y. Berkley-Patton, PhD, University of Missouri, Kansas City
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
October 1, 2019
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 6, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 19, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
August 20, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 20, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 19, 2019
Last Verified
August 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 13-926
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV
-
Duke UniversityGilead SciencesRecruitingHIV Prevention | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis | HIV Prevention Program | HIV Prevention and Care | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis UseUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamMobile County Health Deparment; Alabama Department of Public HealthRecruitingHIV | HIV Testing | HIV Linkage to Care | HIV TreatmentUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingPrEP | HIV | HIV Prevention | PrEP UptakeUnited States
-
Institute of HIV Research and Innovation Foundation...National Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingHIV Prevention | PrEP Adherence | HIV Related StigmaThailand
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingFeasibility | HIV Prevention | PrEP Uptake | Acceptability | HIV Self-testing | Male Partners of HIV-negative Postpartum WomenSouth Africa
-
ANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesHopital Universitaire Robert-Debre; Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement and other collaboratorsUnknownHIV | HIV-uninfected Children | Children Exposed to HIVCameroon
-
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and...Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationCompletedPartner HIV Testing | Couple HIV Counseling | Couple Communication | HIV IncidenceCameroon, Dominican Republic, Georgia, India
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); University of BotswanaRecruitingPregnancy | HIV | Post-partum | HIV Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) AdherenceBotswana
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingHIV Prevention | HIV Risk Behavior | HIV Counseling and TestingUnited States
Clinical Trials on Taking It to the Pews (Comparison)
-
University of PennsylvaniaSharpscueNot yet recruitingHemophilia A and BUnited States
-
University Hospital, LimogesCompletedThe Elderly of 75 Years and Living in Nursing HomesFrance
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedPatients at Risk for MelanomaFrance
-
Eling DeBruinCompletedMild Neurocognitive DisorderSwitzerland
-
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalCompleted
-
Ataturk UniversityCompletedVentilators, Mechanical | Oral Hygiene, Oral HealthTurkey
-
Merve YETİMOĞLUKaradeniz Technical UniversityRecruiting
-
Hannover Medical SchoolKarolinska Institutet; Helsinki University Central Hospital; University of Leipzig and other collaboratorsRecruitingComplication of Surgical ProcedureGermany
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationRecruiting
-
University of MosulCompletedDental Implant | Peri Implantitis | Cone Beam Computed Tomography | Dental Implant FailureIraq