Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Globus Pallidus (GP) in Huntington's Disease (HD) (HD-DBS)

January 20, 2022 updated by: Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Globus Pallidus (GP) in Huntington's Disease (HD): A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled, International, Multi-centre Study

The aim of the study is to prove the efficacy and safety of pallidal DBS in HD patients and to show superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to stimulation-off group

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In this study the efficacy and safety of pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in HD patients shall be investigated and superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to the stimulation-off group shall be shown. This study is a prospective, randomised, double blind, parallel group, sham-controlled, multi-centre trial. Patients in the stimulation group will be stimulated for three months while the stimulator in the sham-group will be turned off for three months. After three months the primary endpoint will be assessed. Afterwards the stimulator will be turned on in all patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
        • Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
      • Amiens, France, 80054
        • CHU Amiens Hôpital nord, Department of neurosurgery and Department of neurology
      • Lille Cedex, France, 59037
        • Hôpital Roger Salengro, Service de Neurologie et Pathologie du mouvement
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum
      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40225
        • University hospital Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79106
        • University Hospital Freiburg
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
      • Lubeck Hansestadt, Germany, 23562
        • Universität zu Lübeck
      • Munich, Germany, 80336
        • University hospital Munich LMU
      • Taufkirchen, Germany, 84416
        • kbo-Isar-Amper-Clinic Taufkirchen
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Inselspital, Department of Neurology
    • Gümlingen
      • Bern, Gümlingen, Switzerland, 3073
        • Center for Neurology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically symptomatic and genetically confirmed HD (number of CAG repeats ≥ 36)
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Moderate stage of the disease (UHDRS motor score ≥ 30)
  • Chorea despite best medical treatment (UHDRS chorea subscore ≥ 10)
  • Mattis Dementia Rating Scale ≥ 120 (or > 80% of items testable independently from motor impairment)
  • Patient has stable medication prior six weeks before inclusion
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Juvenile HD (Westphal variant) or predominant bradykinesia
  • Postural instability with UHDRS retropulsion score > 2
  • Severe comorbidity compromising operability and/or life expectancy and/or quality of life during the trial duration (e.g. cancer with life expectancy < 6 months, NYHA 3 and 4 rising the anaesthetic risk according to the anaesthesiologist)
  • Acute suicidality
  • Acute psychosis (symptoms within previous 6 months)
  • Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 2 months before screening
  • Cortical atrophy grade 3
  • Patients with risk of coagulopathies and/or increased risk of haemorrhage
  • Patients with an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Pregnancy
  • lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stimulation group
Patients in the stimulation group will be stimulated immediately after implantation of the Stimulator (ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601))
the stimulator in the stimulation group will be turned on after implantation of the device
Sham Comparator: Non-stimulation group
Patients in the non-stimulation group will not be stimulated for the first three months after implantation of the Stimulator (ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601))
the stimulator in the stimulation group will be turned on after implantation of the device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UHDRS-TMS difference
Time Frame: 12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference between the groups in the UHDRS total motor score (UHDRS-TMS) at 12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline.
12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UHDRS-Chorea difference
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) chorea subscore (items 14-20)
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
UHDRS-bradykinesia difference
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the UHDRS bradykinesia subscore (items 22-25 and 27-29)
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
BFMDRS difference
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor score
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Reilmann Battery differences
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the Q-Motor "choreomotography" test (Reilmann Battery)
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
MDRS difference
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS)
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Verbal Fluency Test difference
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the Verbal Fluency Test (formal lexical, categorical, category change)
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
SDMT difference
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
STROOP Test differences
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in STROOP word reading, colour naming and colour of the word naming
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
HADS-SIS difference
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale combined with Snaith Irritability Scale (HADS-SIS)
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
PBA-s difference
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the Problem Behaviours Assessment Short Form (PBA-s)
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
SF 36 difference
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
CGI difference
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference in the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)
6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jan Vesper, Prof Dr., Dept. of Functional Neurosurgery and Stereotaxy
  • Principal Investigator: Alfons Schnitzler, Prof Dr, Dept.of Neurology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 31, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

After the study the data will be provided to the CHDI. The Foundation may use, and make available for use by the Foundation Collaborators, the Study Data for the following purposes: (A) to design and guide future research studies and clinical trials and (B) to support and enable the following scientific discussion and research: (1) to better understand HD or other diseases being studied, (2) that furthers the development of treatments for HD or other diseases or (3) that furthers biomedical research.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Huntington Disease

Clinical Trials on ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)

3
Subscribe