Using CERS to Optimize Quality of Life for Persons With Diabetes and Chronic Pain (Living Healthy)

April 26, 2016 updated by: Monika M. Safford, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
As many as 75% of people with diabetes report chronic pain. While cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) improves pain and functioning in individuals with chronic pain, many rural and underserved communities lack resources for such programs. The investigators tested the hypothesis that a CBT-based program delivered by community health workers (CHW) can improve quality of life in individuals with diabetes and chronic pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a growing chronic disease, affecting 20% of the population of Alabama. However, type 2 DM (90-95% of all DM) rarely occurs in isolation; 25% of all Americans report chronic pain, rising to 58-70% of community-dwellers over age 65. The National Center for Health Statistics reported in 2006 that chronic pain affected 76.2 million Americans, more than cancer, heart disease, stroke and DM combined. Despite the high prevalence of chronic pain, evidence suggests that under treatment is common. In one study, 68% of primary care physicians estimated that chronic pain was inadequately managed in their patients, and 60% thought improving physician education could help. Indeed, 40% of people with moderate to severe pain report not getting adequate relief.

Chronic pain is a significant barrier to successful DM self-care; patients with chronic pain have lower medication adherence and are less likely to exercise. Fully 60-80% of DM patients report chronic pain, and in our ENCOURAGE pilot study (Safford, PI), all but one participant did so. About 20-25% of pain may stem from neuropathy, but at least 1/3 stems from OA (osteoarthritis), and coexistence of multiple causes is common. Over half of patients >65 and 60% of women of any age report OA, demonstrating the very high prevalence of OA in this demographic group. Pain management dominated 20% of primary care visits for diabetic patients in one study, and decreased the likelihood of DM risk factor management. Not surprisingly, depressive symptoms are common in individuals with OA and chronic pain, and are also associated with non adherence to DM self-care behavior. Pain is therefore a barrier to not only quality of life, but to successful DM self-care.

While cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) improves pain and functioning in individuals with chronic pain, many rural and underserved communities lack resources for such programs. The investigators tested the hypothesis that a CBT-based program delivered by community health workers (CHW) can improve quality of life in individuals with diabetes and chronic pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

230

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 19 or older in age
  • diagnosed with diabetes
  • under the care of a doctor
  • experienced chronic pain in the past month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not community dwelling
  • less than 19 years old
  • pregnant
  • end-stage medical conditions with limited life expectancy
  • no access to telephone
  • does not speak english,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: General Health Program
Participants in this arm worked with a Community Health Worker (CHW) who provided a general health program that consisted of didactic information of unrelated general health information. Participants received the same number of contacts with their CHW as the intervention arm. Participants and CHW interacted by telephone 8 times over 3 months.
Participants in this arm worked with a Community Health Worker (CHW) who provided a general health program that consisted of didactic information of unrelated general health information. Participants received the same number of contacts with their CHW as the intervention arm. Participants and CHW interacted by telephone 8 times over 3 months.
Experimental: Living Healthy Program
Participants in this arm worked with a Community Health Worker (CHW) who provided the Living Healthy Program. The Living Healthy Program was a cognitive-behavioral therapy based lifestyle modification program. Participants and CHW interacted by telephone 8 times over 3 months.
This intervention tested the effects of a community health worker delivered lifestyle modification program based on cognitive behavioral therapy on diabetes and pain outcomes in individuals with diabetes and chronic pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glycated hemoglobin (A1c)
Time Frame: change in A1c in 3 months
fingerstick, point of care a1c test
change in A1c in 3 months
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Change in blood pressure measure in 3 months
measured using digital automated blood pressure monitor
Change in blood pressure measure in 3 months
Functional status (WOMAC)
Time Frame: change in functional status in 3 months
Assessed using the the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
change in functional status in 3 months
Quality of Life (SF12)
Time Frame: Change in quality of life measures at 3 months
self report using the Short form-12 (SF12)
Change in quality of life measures at 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire, ICOAP)
Time Frame: Change in pain measures at 3 months
self report using the following measures: McGill Pain Questionnaire, A measure of intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP),
Change in pain measures at 3 months
Body mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: change in BMI in 3 months
weight measured using digital scale, height measured using stadiometer
change in BMI in 3 months
Diabetes knowledge (Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes Scale)
Time Frame: change in diabetes knowledge in 3 months
assessed using a modified version of the Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes Scale
change in diabetes knowledge in 3 months
diabetes management self-efficacy (PDSMS)
Time Frame: change in diabetes management self efficacy measures in 3 months
assessed using the Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS)
change in diabetes management self efficacy measures in 3 months
Self efficacy in arthritis pain (Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale)
Time Frame: change in pain self efficacy measures in 3 months
assessed using the Pain Self Efficacy Subscale of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale
change in pain self efficacy measures in 3 months
Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13)
Time Frame: change in patient activation measures in 3 months
assessed using the 13 item patient activation measure (PAM-13)
change in patient activation measures in 3 months
Perceived stress (PSS10)
Time Frame: change in perceived stress in 3 months
Assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS10)
change in perceived stress in 3 months
Pain coping strategies (CSQ24)
Time Frame: change in pain coping strategies in 3 months
assessed using the pain coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ24)
change in pain coping strategies in 3 months
Depressive symptoms (CESD-SF)
Time Frame: change in depressive symptoms in 3 months
assessed using the Short Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies scale (CESD-SF)
change in depressive symptoms in 3 months
Trust in physicians (Trust in Physicians Scale)
Time Frame: change in trust in physicians in 3 months
assessed using the Trust in Physicians Scale
change in trust in physicians in 3 months
Medication Adherence (4-item Morisky Medication Adherence scale)
Time Frame: change in medication adherence in 3 months
assessed using the 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence scale
change in medication adherence in 3 months
Physical activity - usual daily activity
Time Frame: change in usual daily activity at 3 months
participant self-report of usual daily activity (usually sit during the day, stand or walk but don't carry or lift things often, usually lift or carry light loads, or do heavy work or carry heavy loads)
change in usual daily activity at 3 months
Physical activity - number of days engaged in intense exercise in the past 7 days
Time Frame: change in days of intense exercise at 3 months
participant self report of number of days in the past week engaged in intense exercise (0-7 days)
change in days of intense exercise at 3 months
Physical activity - number of days walked for exercise in the past 7 days
Time Frame: change in days of walking for exercise at 3 months
participant self report of number of days in the past week walked for exercise (0-7)
change in days of walking for exercise at 3 months
Physical activity - exercising when in pain questions
Time Frame: change exercising when in pain at 3 months
participant self report of exercising when experiencing pain assessed by if the participant had no days unable to walk for exercise because of pain, unable to walk because of pain but did other exercises, or unable to walk because of pain but did not other forms of exercise.
change exercising when in pain at 3 months
Physical Activity - perception of physical activity compared to others
Time Frame: change in perception of physical activity at 3 months
participant self report of activity levels compared to others their age
change in perception of physical activity at 3 months
Diet - days eating high fat foods in the past 7 days
Time Frame: change in the number of days of eating high fat foods at 3 months
participant self report of days in the past 7 days of eating high-fat foods
change in the number of days of eating high fat foods at 3 months
Diet - having a second serving at a meal in the past 7 days
Time Frame: change in the number of days of having a second serving at a meal in the past 7 days
participant self report of days in the past 7 days of having a second serving at a meal in the past 7 days
change in the number of days of having a second serving at a meal in the past 7 days
Diet - eating unhealthy foods because of pain in the past 7 days
Time Frame: change in the number of days of eating unhealthy foods because of pain in the past 7 days at 3 months
participant self report of days in the past 7 days of eating unhealthy foods because of experiencing pain
change in the number of days of eating unhealthy foods because of pain in the past 7 days at 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data will stay at UAB

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on General Health Program

3
Subscribe