Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Mupirocin Ointment in the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infection (COSMO-PD)

July 26, 2019 updated by: Chidchanok Ruengorn, Chiang Mai University

Efficacy and Safety of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Mupirocin Ointment in the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infection: A Double-Blind, Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial

This pilot study aims to evaluate effectiveness, safety, and cost-utility of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-soaked cloths compares to mupirocin ointment and exit site usual care (normal saline) with aseptic technique in prevention of PD-related infection. It is a multicenter, double-blind, stratified randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized to three arms mupirocin, usual care, or CHG-soaked cloths in a ratio of 1:1:1. They will be followed up 24 months or completion of PD. The primary outcome is PD-related infection (PD-related peritonitis of exit-site and tunnel infection). Secondary outcomes are infection-related catheter removal and technique failure, nasal and exit-site Staphylococcus aureus colonization, health-related quality of life, mental health, medication adherence, safety, adverse events related to treatments such as skin irritation, rash, etc. Costs include providers and patients expenses. The utility is assessed using the EuroQol (EQ), five-dimensional (5D), five-level (5L) version. The results of this study are anticipated nephrologists and health care professional involving to PD in decision-making for a plan to prevent PD-related infection. In addition, the results will lead to clinical guideline development a prevention of PD-related infection.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is one of renal replacement therapy used for end-stage renal disease. Since 2011, there has been increasing numbers of patients under "PD First" policy of the Thai government. The most common PD related complication is PD-related infection categorized PD-related peritonitis, and exit site and tunnel infection. Although possible to treat PD-related infection, the incidence of technical failure and death due to peritonitis are still high in Thailand. PD-related infections mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. To prevent PD-related infection, cleaning with aseptic solvents using aseptic technique and prevent infection by prescribing prophylactic antibiotics are recommended. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) has recommended position statement of the regular use of mupirocin ointment around the catheter exits point and apply in nasal cavity. However, there is rising concern of long term use of mupirocin for mupirocin resistance of S. aureus. CHG is antiseptic use in clinical practice. It can coat at least 12 hours on skin and has anti-bacterial covered in both grams negative and positive. Several meta-analysis studies showed effectiveness of CHG in the prevention of hospitals infection i.e. reduces catheter-related sepsis, postoperative infection, and microbial resistance. According to PD-related infection, CHG has very little evidence of its effectiveness. This pilot study aims to evaluate effectiveness, safety, and cost-utility of CHG-soaked cloths compares to mupirocin ointment and exit site usual care (normal saline and povidone-iodine) with aseptic technique in prevention of PD-related infections. It is a multicenter, double-blind, stratified randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized to three arms mupirocin, usual care, or CHG-soaked cloths. They will be followed up 24 months or completetion of PD. The primary outcome is PD-related infection (PD-related peritonitis or exit-site and tunnel infection). Secondary outcomes are infection-related catheter removal and technique failure, nasal and exit-site Staphylococcus aureus colonization, health-related quality of life, mental health, medication adherence, safety, adverse events related to treatments such as skin irritation, rash, etc. For cost-utility analysis, costs include providers and patients expenses. The Utility is assessed using EQ-5D-5L.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

354

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200
        • Recruiting
        • Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with end-stage renal disease who were undergoing peritoneal dialysis; either continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of psychological illness or condition that interferes with the ability to understand or comply with the requirements of the study
  2. Recent (within 1 month) exit-site or tunnel infection, or peritonitis
  3. Known hypersensitivity to, or intolerance of, chlorhexidine gluconate, or mupirocin
  4. Current or recent (within 1 month) treatment with antibiotics administered by any route
  5. Nasal carriage of mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or chlorhexidine-resistant S. aureus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Chlorhexidine gluconate
Chlorhexidine gluconate-soaked cloths, clean topical area around catheter exit site with CHG 2% soaked cloths
Active Comparator: Normal saline (usual care)
Normal saline, clean topical area around catheter exit site
Active Comparator: Mupirocin ointment
Mupirocin ointment 2%, clean topical area around catheter exit site with Mupirocin ointment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of PD-related infections
Time Frame: 24 months
Peritonitis or exit-site and tunnel infection
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of infection-related catheter removal
Time Frame: 24 months
Peritonitis or exit-site and tunnel infection-related catheter removal
24 months
Incidence of hospitalization due to PD-related infection
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Incidence of PD technical failure (change of modal of dialysis)
Time Frame: 24 months
change of modal of dialysis
24 months
Incidence of death due to PD-related infection
Time Frame: 24 months
Death due to peritonitis or exit-site and tunnel infection
24 months
Rate of Staphylococcus aureus colonization
Time Frame: 24 months
Incidence of nasal or exit-site S. aureus colonization
24 months
Changes in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 24 months
Using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36), EuroQoL-5 dimension-5 level (EQ-5D-5L)
24 months
Number of participants with depression
Time Frame: 24 months
Using the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)
24 months
Changes in medication adherence
Time Frame: 24 months
Using (i) directly observed to record the use of investigational medicinal products via return plastic sachets and ointment tubes; (ii) global rating on medication adherence by visual analog scale; and (iii) Medication-taking behavior measure for Thai patients (MTB-Thai questionnaire
24 months
Total healthcare costs
Time Frame: 24 months
Direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs
24 months
Incidence of skin reactions
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety profiles
Time Frame: 24 months
Safety of investigational medicinal products related to potential harm (e.g. participant survival, hospitalization, and emergency visit)
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Chidchanok Ruengorn, Faculty of Pharmacy CMU

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peritoneal Dialysis

Clinical Trials on Normal saline

3
Subscribe