Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Anifrolumab Compared to Placebo in Adult Subjects With Active Proliferative Lupus Nephritis (TULIP-LN1)

October 28, 2021 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Adult Subjects With Active Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in adult subjects with active proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 2, multicentre, multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two intravenous (IV) treatment regimens of anifrolumab versus placebo while taking standard of care (SOC) treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids in adult subjects with active proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

147

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1015ABO
        • Research Site
      • Cordoba, Argentina, 5016
        • Research Site
      • Rosario, Argentina, S2000PBJ
        • Research Site
      • Adelaide, Australia, 5000
        • Research Site
      • Clayton, Australia, VIC 3168
        • Research Site
      • Parkville, Australia, 3050
        • Research Site
      • Westmead, Australia, 2145
        • Research Site
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1070
        • Research Site
      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1200
        • Research Site
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Research Site
      • Liege, Belgium, B-4000
        • Research Site
      • Bordeaux Cedex, France, 33076
        • Research Site
      • Marseille, France, 13005
        • Research Site
      • Paris Cedex 14, France, 75013
        • Research Site
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
        • Research Site
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Research Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Research Site
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1097
        • Research Site
      • Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
        • Research Site
      • Kaposvár, Hungary, 7400
        • Research Site
      • Szeged, Hungary, 6725
        • Research Site
      • Milano, Italy, 20132
        • Research Site
      • Padova, Italy, 35128
        • Research Site
      • Pisa, Italy, 56126
        • Research Site
      • Reggio Emilia, Italy, 42100
        • Research Site
      • Gwangju, Korea, Republic of, 501-757
        • Research Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05505
        • Research Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 150-713
        • Research Site
      • Suwon-si, Korea, Republic of, 16499
        • Research Site
      • Chihuahua, Mexico, 31000
        • Research Site
      • Guadalajara, Mexico, 44280
        • Research Site
      • Guadalajara, Mexico, 44160
        • Research Site
      • Mexico, Mexico, 14080
        • Research Site
      • San Luis Potosí, Mexico, 78213
        • Research Site
      • Arequipa, Peru, AREQUIPA54
        • Research Site
      • Lima, Peru
        • Research Site
      • Lima, Peru, LIMA 01
        • Research Site
      • Lima, Peru, LIMA 31
        • Research Site
      • Lima, Peru, Lima 32
        • Research Site
      • Lima, Peru, LIMA 33
        • Research Site
      • Lima, Peru, L14
        • Research Site
      • Lima, Peru, L34
        • Research Site
      • Lima, Peru, Lima-1
        • Research Site
      • Krakow, Poland, 31-066
        • Research Site
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02-637
        • Research Site
      • Łódź, Poland, 92-213
        • Research Site
      • Orenburg, Russian Federation, 460018
        • Research Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
        • Research Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197089
        • Research Site
      • Belgrade, Serbia, 11000
        • Research Site
      • Belgrade, Serbia, 1100
        • Research Site
      • Nis, Serbia, 18000
        • Research Site
      • Novi Sad, Serbia, 21000
        • Research Site
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Research Site
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Research Site
      • Changhua City, Taiwan, 50006
        • Research Site
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 80756
        • Research Site
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40705
        • Research Site
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40447
        • Research Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • Research Site
      • Taoyuan City, Taiwan, 333
        • Research Site
      • London, United Kingdom, E1 1BB
        • Research Site
    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85306
        • Research Site
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85032
        • Research Site
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037-0706
        • Research Site
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095-1670
        • Research Site
      • Thousand Oaks, California, United States, 91360
        • Research Site
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • DeBary, Florida, United States, 32713
        • Research Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Research Site
    • New Jersey
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07103-2499
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10457
        • Research Site
      • Great Neck, New York, United States, 11021
        • Research Site
      • New Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11042
        • Research Site
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Research Site
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Research Site
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Research Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 through 70 years at the time of screening
  2. Fulfils at least 4 of the 11 criteria of the revised 1982 ACR classification criteria for SLE, at least one of which must be:

    1. Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test (1:40 or higher) or
    2. Elevated anti-dsDNA antibodies at screening (reported as equivocal or positive results), as per the centrallaboratory; or
    3. Anti-Smith antibody at screening elevated to above normal (ie, positive or equivocal results) as per the central laboratory
  3. Class III (±Class V) or Class IV (±Class V) LN according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) or 2003 ISN/RPS classification based on a renal biopsy obtained within 12 weeks prior to signing the ICF or during the screening period:
  4. Urine protein to creatinine ratio >1 gm/gm (113.17 mg/mmol), obtained on a 24-hour urine collection at screening
  5. Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥35 mL/min/1.73 m2
  6. Must not have active or latent TB on either chest radiograph or by Quantiferon gold test
  7. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum beta-hCG test at screening and negative urine pregnancy test prior to the first dose of sponsor-provided MMF.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Receipt of any investigational product (small molecule or biologic) or commercially available biologic agent within four weeks or 5 half lives prior to signing of the ICF, whichever is greater
  2. Pure Class V membranous LN on a renal biopsy obtained within 12 weeks prior to signing ICF or during the screening period
  3. Known intolerance to ≤1.0 gm/day of MMF
  4. History of dialysis within 12 months prior to signing the ICF or expected need for renal replacement therapy (dialysis or renal transplant) within a 6 month period after enrolment
  5. Subjects, who at the time of signing the ICF, received any of the following immunosuppressive therapies after their qualifying biopsy

    1. Oral corticosteroids >0.5 mg/kg/day for more than 8 weeks or
    2. Oral or IV pulse methylprednisolone >3.0 gm (cumulative dose) or
    3. IV cyclophosphamide >2 pulses of high-dose (≥0.5 gm/m2) or >4 doses of low dose (500 mg every 2 weeks) or
    4. Average MMF >2.5 gm/day (>1800 mg/day of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium) for more than 8 weeks or
    5. Tacrolimus >4 mg/day for more than 8 weeks
  6. Major surgery within 8 weeks before signing the ICF or major surgery planned during the study period
  7. History of any non-SLE disease that has required treatment with oral or parenteral corticosteroids for more than a total of 2 weeks within the last 24 weeks prior to signing the ICF
  8. Confirmed positive test for hepatitis B or hepatitis C
  9. Any severe herpes infection at any time prior to randomization
  10. Opportunistic infection requiring hospitalisation or parenteral antimicrobial treatment within 3 years prior to randomization (vaginal, oral and skin candidiasis is not an exclusionreason).
  11. History of cancer, apart from:

    1. Squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been successfully treated
    2. Cervical cancer in situ that has been successfully treated
  12. Concurrent enrolment in another clinical study with an IP within 4 weeks prior to ICF signing or within 5 half-lives of the IP used in that clinical study, whichever is longer.
  13. During screening (within 30 days before Day 1 [Week 0 visit]), any of the following:

    1. Aspartate transaminase (AST) >2.5×upper limit of normal (ULN)
    2. Alanine transaminase (ALT) >2.5×ULN
    3. Total bilirubin >ULN (unless due to Gilbert's syndrome [based on Investigator's judgement])
    4. Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >8% (or >0.08) at screening (diabetic subjects only)
    5. Neutrophil count <1x103/μL (or <1.0 GI/L)
    6. Platelet count <25x103/μL (or <25 GI/L)
    7. Haemoglobin <8 g/dL (or <80 g/L).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Anifrolumab - Lower Dose
Administration every 4 week from Week 0 to Week 100 in addition to SOC which will continue until Week 112
Experimental: Anifrolumab - Higher Dose
Administration every 4 week from Week 0 to Week 100 in addition to SOC which will continue until Week 112
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo IV Q4W plus SOC
Administration every 4 week from Week 0 to Week 100 in addition to SOC which will continue until Week 112

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR)
Time Frame: From Week 1 (Baseline) up to Week 52

To evaluate the efficacy of anifrolumab plus SOC (combination of mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids) compared with placebo plus SOC in subjects with active proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).

Geometric mean ratio of 24-hour UPCR at week 52 over baseline. Values <1 indicate improvement from baseline.

From Week 1 (Baseline) up to Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects Achieving the Composite Endpoint Complete Renal Response (CRR)
Time Frame: Week 52

CRR was defined as meeting all of the following:

  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 or no confirmed decrease of eGFR from baseline of ≥20%
  • 24-hour UPCR ≤ 0.7 mg/mg
  • No discontinuation of investigational product (IP) or use of restricted medication beyond the protocol allowed threshold before assessment
  • eGFR was based on Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Subjects treated with restricted medication beyond the protocol allowed threshold, or discontinuing study treatment for other reasons, were regarded as non-responders.
Week 52

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events
Time Frame: From screening (Day-30 to -1) period until the follow-up period (Week 112)

To assess AEs (non-serious, serious and adverse event of special interest (AESI)) as variables of safety and tolerability of anifrolimab.

The AESIs are serious infections, including non-opportunistic serious infections, opportunistic infections, anaphylaxis, malignancy, herpes zoster, TB (including latent TB), influenza, vasculitis (non-SLE), and MACE (including stroke, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death).

Study period: During treatment and follow-up data are presented.

From screening (Day-30 to -1) period until the follow-up period (Week 112)
Number of Subjects With Suicidal Ideation and Behavior and Suicide Attempts Via Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, treatment and follow up (an average of 60 weeks)
The C-SSRS was used to assess the suicidal ideation and behavior and suicide attempts on a graded scale from 1 to 5. 1 indicates as low suicidal and 5 as high suicidal behavior.
Baseline, treatment and follow up (an average of 60 weeks)
Total Score of Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 (PHQD-8)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 60
PHQ-8 is a 8-item self-report scale, all items are rated on a score of 0-3, for a total range of 0-24. PHQ-8 assesses symptoms of depression over the previous 2 weeks. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 60
Extra-renal Flares Using Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2K) Based Flare Assessment Instrument
Time Frame: From baseline up to week 112

Flare will be defined as any one criterion present in either the Mild/Moderate Flare and/or Severe Flare categories. New or worsened manifestation should only be reported for manifestations of SLE. The SLEDAI-2K score range is 0 to 105 with higher scores representing increased disease activity.

Mild/ Moderate flare defined as change in non-renal components of the SLEDAI-2K instrument score of ≥3 but <7 points compared to previous visit. Severe Flare defined as change in non-renal components of the SLEDAI-2K instrument score by ≥7 points compared to previous visit.

The flare rate per subject year is defined as the number of subjects with a respective flare divided by the sum of exposure time in days for all subjects in the analysis set multiplied by 365.25.

From baseline up to week 112

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: AstraZeneca AB, AstraZeneca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 4, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment:

IPD Sharing Time Frame

AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the de-identified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lupus Nephritis

Clinical Trials on Anifrolumab

Subscribe