- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02554981
Evaluation of Maintaining Visual Performance in Participants Who Engage in Electronic Visual Tasking While Using Restasis® (EMPOWER)
May 25, 2017 updated by: Allergan
Evaluation of Maintaining Visual Performance Of Subjects Who Engage in Electronic Visual Tasking While Using Restasis (EMPOWER)
This study will evaluate the efficacy of Restasis® in participants with dry eye disease who engage in electronic visual tasking.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
51
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Andover, Massachusetts, United States, 01810
- Andover Eye Associates, Inc
-
-
Tennessee
-
Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
- Total Eye Care, PA
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 55 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion:
- Has Eye Symptoms when using video display terminals
- Has a reported history of dry eye in both eyes.
Exclusion:
- Diagnosed with eye infection or active inflammation.
- Has worn contact lenses within the past 7 days or anticipated use during the study.
- Has used any eye drops within 2 hours.
- Has had laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) within 12 months.
- Has used Restasis® within 90 days.
- Has had any eye and or/lid surgeries within 6 months.
- Has had cataract surgery in either eye.
- Has current punctal occlusion or anticipate a change in punctal occlusion status at any point during the study.
- Is currently taking any topical ophthalmic prescriptions or over-the-counter solutions, artificial tears, gels or lid scrubs that cannot be discontinued for the trial duration.
- Use of medication known to cause ocular drying that is not on a stable dose for at least 30 days.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: RESTASIS®
1 drop of RESTASIS® ophthalmic emulsion instilled in each eye twice a day for 6 months.
|
Cyclosporine 0.05% Ophthalmic Emulsion (RESTASIS®) 1 drop instilled in each eye twice a day.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Total Corneal Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Total corneal staining with fluorescein was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst).
The sum of the total includes 3 regions of the cornea, resulting in a maximum possible score of 12 (severe staining score of 4 in all three regions).
The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline.
A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Total Conjunctival Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Total conjunctival staining with fluorescein was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst).
The sum of the total includes 2 regions of the conjunctiva, resulting in a maximum possible score of 8 (severe staining score of 4 in both regions).
The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline.
A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Central Region Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Staining with fluorescein in the central region of the eye was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst).
The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline.
A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Total Corneal Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Total corneal staining with lissamine green was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst).
The sum of the total includes 3 regions of the cornea, resulting in a maximum possible score of 12 (severe staining score of 4 in all three regions).
The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline.
A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Total Conjunctival Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Total conjunctival staining with lissamine green was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst).
The sum of the total includes 2 regions of the conjunctiva, resulting in a maximum possible score of 8 (severe staining score of 4 in both regions).
The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline.
A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Central Region Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Staining with lissamine green in the central region of the eye was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst).
The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline.
A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Font Size
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
The minimum font (letter) size read correctly was assessed.
Smaller font size (less points) indicates better ability.
A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Words Read Incorrectly
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
The numbers of words read incorrectly are counted.
A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening (more words read incorrectly) and a negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Read Passage
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
The time to read passage (selected portion of text ) in seconds was assessed.
A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement (less time to read the passage).
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reading Rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Reading speed was assessed as the number of words read correctly calculated as words/minute.
A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement (more words read correctly/minute) and a negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening (less words read correctly/minute).
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break Up Time (TFBUT) in the Worse Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
TFBUT is defined as the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking.
The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film.
The worse eye is defined as the Worse Eye at Baseline.
A positive number change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative number change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ocular Protection Index (OPI) 2.0 in the Worse Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
A device was used to assess OPI 2.0.
This technology measures blink and tear film break-up area.
These values demonstrate the average area of tear deficiency/corneal exposure.
The worse eye is defined as the worse eye at Baseline.
A negative value indicates an improvement in corneal protection.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Interblink Interval (IBI) in the Worst Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
A device was used to assess IBI.
The IBI measures the time in seconds between blinks in the worse eye.
A positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening (more frequent blinks) and a negative number change from baseline (less frequent blinks) indicates an improvement.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in OSDI© Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
The OSDI© questionnaire consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms.
Each of the 12 questions was assessed using a 5-point scale (where 0=none of the time and 4=all of the time).
The score is converted to a 0 to 100 point score where 0 is no symptoms and 100 is most symptoms.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Driving at Night on the OSDI©
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
The OSDI© consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms.
The Driving at Night question was assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time to 4=all of the time).
Higher OSDI© scores are associated with greater severity.
A negative number change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates worsening.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Working With a Computer or Bank Machine on the OSDI©
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
The OSDI© consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms.
The Working with a Computer or Bank Machine question was assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time to 4=all of the time).
Higher OSDI© scores are associated with greater severity.
A negative number change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates worsening.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Watching Television (TV) on the OSDI©
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
The OSDI© consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms.
The Watching TV question was assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time to 4=all of the time).
Higher OSDI© scores are associated with greater severity.
A negative number change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates worsening.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blurred Vision on the OSDI©
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
The OSDI© consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms.
The Blurred Vision question was assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time to 4=all of the time).
Higher OSDI© scores are associated with greater severity.
A negative number change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates worsening.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Poor Vision on the OSDI©
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
The OSDI© consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms.
The Poor Vision question was assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time to 4=all of the time).
Higher OSDI© scores are associated with greater severity.
A negative number change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates worsening.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reading on the OSDI©
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
The OSDI© consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms.
The Reading question was assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time to 4=all of the time).
Higher OSDI© scores are associated with greater severity.
A negative number change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates worsening.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Ocular Discomfort Scale Post Wilkins Test in the Worst Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Participants assessed ocular discomfort post Wilkins Rate of Reading Test using the Ora Calibra™ 5-point scale where 0=no discomfort to 4=constant discomfort.
A positive number change from Baseline indicates a worsening and a negative number change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Jai Parekh, Allergan
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 21, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 24, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
March 24, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 17, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
September 21, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 1, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 25, 2017
Last Verified
May 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Eye Diseases
- Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antirheumatic Agents
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Dermatologic Agents
- Antifungal Agents
- Calcineurin Inhibitors
- Cyclosporine
- Cyclosporins
Other Study ID Numbers
- MA-RES-015-001
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Syndromes
-
Southern College of OptometryNot yet recruitingEye Diseases | Dry Eye | Chronic Dry Eye
-
University of MiamiNot yet recruitingEye Diseases | Dry Eye | Eyes Dry ChronicUnited States
-
Singapore National Eye CentreThe Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRecruitingDry Eye | Dry Eye Disease (DED)Hong Kong
-
Southern College of OptometryNot yet recruitingEye Diseases | Dry Eye | Dry Eye Syndromes | Dry Eyes Chronic
-
RudacureNot yet recruiting
-
Indiana UniversityRecruiting
-
Essilor InternationalNot yet recruiting
-
Vanda PharmaceuticalsRecruiting
-
Vance Thompson VisionRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Cyclosporine 0.05% Ophthalmic Emulsion
-
AllerganCompletedDry Eye SyndromesUnited States
-
Taejoon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.CompletedDry Eye | Dry Eye SyndromesKorea, Republic of
-
Sight Sciences, Inc.CompletedDry Eye | Meibomian Gland DysfunctionUnited States
-
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.Completed
-
AllerganCompleted
-
AllerganCompletedPterygiumSingapore, United States, Australia
-
AllerganCompletedKeratoconjunctivitis SiccaUnited States
-
AllerganCompletedDry Eye SyndromesUnited States
-
Baylor College of MedicineAllerganTerminatedDry EyeUnited States