- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02575586
Effectiveness of Deep Dry Needling on Muscle Tone in Healthy Subjects
The main objective of this study is to analyze the effect of dry needling of the soleus muscle to modulate muscle tone in healthy non-injured subjects. The secondary objective is to study if effects occur due to changes in the neural or mechanical component (or both).
Hypothesis: Deep Dry Needling of the latent medial Myofascial Trigger Point (MTrP) of the soleus muscle produces changes in muscle tone varying the passive resistance torque at a rate of 180º/ s.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Methods:
It is a double-blinded randomized clinical trial where subjects are healthy volunteers from the city of Toledo between 18 and 40 years.
There will be an intervention group (dry needling into the medial MTrP of soleus muscle) and a control group (dry needling distal to the MTrP but into the taut muscle band of soleus muscle). The intervention will be a unique session.
Intervention:
Dry needling technique will be performed by locating the taut band and the Myofascial Trigger Point. After that, a thin needle (0,32x40mm) is introduced directly into a Myofascial Trigger Point with the aims to generate a "local twitch response" that are involuntary contractions of the muscle fibers. This puncture may reproduce patient's symptoms, and causes muscle relaxation to achieve at the same time the relief of muscle tension and pain and also to recover the metabolism of the muscle.
Assessment:
The mechanical and the neural properties of muscle tone were evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometry and H-reflex test measurement, respectively Isokinetic dynamometric technique is considered a valid biomechanics method to measure muscle tone in non-injured subjects.
The H-reflex has been utilized as a probe to study neurophysiological phenomena. This measurement can be used to assess the response of the nervous system to various neurologic conditions, musculoskeletal injuries, application of therapeutic modalities, pain, exercise training, and performance of motor tasks.
Outcome measures:
Outcome measures will include passive resistive torque to ankle dorsiflexion, dorsiflexion passive range of motion (PROM), maximal isometric voluntary force (MIVF) and H-reflex and M-response measurements and they will be evaluated before, at 10 min and 1 week after the intervention.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Toledo, Spain
- Toledo Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age range 18-40 years.
- Healthy volunteers.
- Presence of a latent medial MTrP of the soleus muscle.
- Being able to provide written informed consent.
- Being able to follow instructions and realize clinical tests.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any history of ipsilateral lower limb severe injury or intervention (e.g. fracture, surgical intervention).
- Pain or musculoskeletal injury, ligament injury, tendonitis or plantar fasciitis in the ipsilateral leg for six months previous to the intervention.
- Peripheral or central nervous system neurological disease.
- Altered sensitivity in the treatment area.
- Treatment of a myofascial trigger point in the sural triceps in the six months previous to the intervention.
- Changes in physical activity which would have affected muscle tone during the study.
- Fear of needles.
- No tolerance to pain caused by dry needling.
- No continuance commitment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Dry Needling into MTrPs.
Intervention-Dry Needling: Deep Dry Needing into the medial Myofascial Trigger Point of the soleus muscle.
|
Deep Dry Needling into the site of the latent medial Myofascial Trigger Point of the soleus muscle. 1 session in soleus muscle moving the needle up and down ten times. |
Active Comparator: Dry Needling out of MTrPs.
Control-Dry Needling: Deep Dry Needling distal to Myofascial Trigger Point of the soleus muscle (in the same taut band).
|
Deep Dry Needling distal to Myofascial Trigger Point but into the same taut band. 1 session in soleus muscle moving the needle up and down ten times. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Passive resistive torque to ankle dorsiflexion.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Passive resistive torque to ankle dorsiflexion at slow (10º/s) and fast (180º/s) velocities.
|
Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Change in Dorsiflexion passive range of motion.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Soleus muscle extensibility (Dorsiflexion angle of ankle obtained by a force of 200 N and by the maximal tolerated force applied to gastrocnemius muscles).
|
Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Change in Ratio Hmax/Mmax.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Ratio between maximal H-reflex and maximal M-wave.
|
Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Maximal voluntary isometric force.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Maximal voluntary isometric force test of Triceps Surae muscle and Tibialis Anterior muscle.
|
Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Change in H reflex.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Maximal H reflex, H reflex threshold and normalized H at 25% Mmax.
|
Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Change in M response.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Maximal M wave and M wave threshold.
|
Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention).
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain perception after intervention using Visual analogical scale.
Time Frame: After intervention (Day 1).
|
Pain perception after intervention using Visual analogical scale (VAS).
|
After intervention (Day 1).
|
Number of Local twitch responses.
Time Frame: During intervention (Day 1).
|
Number of local twitch responses during intervention.
|
During intervention (Day 1).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 83
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Muscle Tone Abnormalities
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaUniversidad San Jorge; Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos de ToledoCompletedMuscle Tone AbnormalitiesSpain
-
Universidad San JorgeCompletedMuscle Tone AbnormalitiesSpain
-
BTL Industries Ltd.CompletedMuscle ToneUnited States
-
Medical University of SilesiaRecruiting
-
São Paulo State UniversityNot yet recruitingFunctional Status | Muscle Tone
-
São Paulo State UniversityNot yet recruitingFunctional Status | Muscle Tone
-
Flávia CarvalhoNot yet recruitingFunctional Status | Muscle Tone
-
Çağtay MadenCompletedForward Head Posture | Muscle Tone | Muscle Stiffnes | Muscle Elasticty | Vital CapacityTurkey
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaUniversidad San Jorge; Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos de ToledoCompletedMuscle Tone Abnormalities
-
Neuromed IRCCSRecruitingSpasticity, Muscle | Muscle Tone Abnormalities | Rigidity, MuscleItaly
Clinical Trials on Intervention-Dry Needling
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaCompletedTrigger Point Pain, MyofascialSpain
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaCompleted
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaCompletedTrigger Point Pain, MyofascialSpain
-
Brigham Young UniversityUnknownMyofascial Pain Syndrome | Myofascial Trigger Point PainUnited States
-
Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical...Brooke Army Medical CenterCompletedChronic Pain | Shoulder Pain | Musculoskeletal InjuryUnited States
-
Youngstown State UniversityRecruiting
-
Universidad de ZaragozaCompleted
-
Institute of Technology, CarlowCompleted
-
Universidad de ZaragozaUnknownHip OsteoarthritisSpain
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaRecruitingMyofascial Trigger Point PainSpain