Effectiveness of Two Stretching Techniques on Healthy Volunteers With Shortened Hamstrings

The main objective of this study is to compare the effect and the duration of the Neuromuscular Electrical Elongation (NMEE ) technique versus the PNF technique and versus a control group, on the extensibility of the hamstrings muscles.

Hypothesis:

NMEE of shortened hamstrings muscles in healthy subjects, compared with PNF and control group produces a significant increase in hamstrings extensibility.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Muscle Tone Abnormalities
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Neuromuscular Electrical Elongation; Procedure: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

Detailed Description

It is a double-blinded randomized clinical trial where subjects are healthy volunteers from the city of Zaragoza older than 18 years. All subjects will be injury free at the time of the study and must not have a history of knee or hip surgery. They must be physically active, but without engaging in competition-level sports, and must have flexibility deficits, as measured in the AKE test position and SLK test position (<60º AKE; < 80º SLK).

There will be an NMEE Group (Neuromuscular Electrical Elongation), an PNF Group (Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation) and a Control Group (No Invervention).

Intervention:

NMEE technique will be performed by stretching the muscle till resistance and applying a bipolar interferential current to produce an involuntary contraction of the muscle which will be maintained 3 seconds. After that, the subject will contract the antagonist muscle (quadriceps) actively until he feels resistance again . Then, intensity of the electrical current is increased again. This cycle will be repeated 4 times.

PNF technique will be performed by stretching the muscle till resistance is felt. Then the patient will have to make an isometric contraction of the muscle (against resistance) during 3 seconds. After that, the subject will contract the antagonist muscle (quadriceps) actively until he feels resistance again. This contract-stretch cycle will be repeated 4 times.

Control group: This group will not receive a training program.

In case of shortening, the assigned intervention will be performed until the values considered normal with a maximum of 8 stretching sessions (2 per week). Otherwise, if there is no shortening, the intervention will end at that moment.

Assessment:

To assess the effectiveness of these techniques several tests will be performed on the subjects.

For hamstrings extensibility:

• Active-Knee-Extension Test (AKE) results will bring information of the knee extension range of motion.
• Straight-Leg-Raise Test (SLR) results will bring information of the hip flexion range of motion.

For quadriceps extensibility:

• Goniometric measure of knee flexion.
• Distance from heel to gluteus using a tape measure.

Viscoelasticity properties of hamstrings and quadriceps muscles:

- Myotonometric measurement using a myotonometer to obtain frequency, decrement (elasticity) and stiffness.

For neural assessment:

- The Slump Test is a neural tension test used to detect altered neurodynamics or neural tissue sensitivity.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 96
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Spain
  • Zaragoza
    • Villanueva de Gallego, Zaragoza, Spain, 50830
      • Universidad San Jorge

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Healthy Volunteers
• Older than 18 years
• Bilateral shortened hamstrings muscles with a knee extension under 60º (TEAR, Neto et al., 2015) and a ROM under 80º in the hip (straight leg raise test angle, Espejo-Antúnez et al., 2015)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Participation in a muscular stretching program during the study
• Previous history of surgical intervention in the hip, tight or knee
• Muscle-skeletal pain or injury in the low back or inferior limbs
• Abdominal o spine surgery within three month before the study beginning.

Exit Criteria:

• Patient´s petition
• Change in the regular physical activity level during the study period
• Appearance of an injury that would contraindicate the use of stretching techniques

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Triple

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group; No intervention
Active Comparator: NMEE Group; Neuromuscular Electrical Elongation	Procedure: Neuromuscular Electrical Elongation; Electrotherapy equipment will be used, choosing an interferential current through bipolar application,with a frequency of 4 kHz and a frequency modulation amplitude of 100 Hz.
Active Comparator: PNF Group; Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation stretching	Procedure: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation; Hold-relax technique that involves lengthening the muscle to the point of limitation, at which point the individual performs an isometric contraction for up to 10 s, followed by a passive movement of the limb into the new end-range.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Active-knee-extension test (AKE)	The AKE is performed using an experimental apparatus designed specifically for this investigation. It consists of a rectangular wooden frame that is attached to an examination table. The tested limb is flexed until the thigh touched the wooden frame, being at 90° with the table. The contralateral limb is fully extended and stabilized in neutral rotation by a second examiner. With the foot in neutral position and the knee flexed at 90°, a standard universal goniometer is placed over the lateral femoral condyle, with 1 arm aligned along the thigh in direction to the greater trochanter and the other arm aligned over the leg in the direction of the lateral malleolus. From this position, and without any prior warm-up subjects will be instructed to extend the knee until they felt a strong resistance, holding this final position for 2 to 3 seconds to allow the goniometric reading.	Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (4 week after last intervention)
Change in Straight-leg-raise test (SLR)	For the SLR test, a normal examination table is used. Participants lay supine and must be relaxed throughout the test. The tested limb is flexed by the examiner, with the knee fully extended and the foot in a relaxed position. The contralateral limb is secured by a second examiner, fully extended and in neutral rotation. The movement stops when the tester feels a strong resistance or when pelvic rotation is observed. The goniometer is placed over the greater trochanter, with 1 arm aligned with the lateral femoral condyle and the other aligned parallel to the table, in the direction of the midaxillary line.	Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (4 week after last intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Quadriceps Muscle Extensibility	The assessor slowly bends the subject's knee so that the heel approximated the buttock. Attention is paid ensuring that there is no lumbar spine or pelvic movement or cramping of the hamstrings and that the thighs remained parallel. The subject is asked to report as soon as a first sensation of stretch is experienced in the quadriceps muscle. The closest distance from the relaxed buttock to the heel with the ankle passively plantar flexed, is measured with a goniometer. By holding the ankle and the weight of the lower leg, the assessor ensures that the quadriceps is itself not stretched in any way during this procedure as this could be interpreted as a treatment, rather than assessment.	Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (4 week after last intervention)
Change in Frequency	Frequency of muscle oscillations (Hz) is an indicator of the tone.This outcome measure is obtained by a device named MyotonPro. It is a non-invasive commercial device made to calculate myotonometrics properties of the muscle.	Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (4 week after last intervention)
Change in Stiffness	The muscle stiffness reflects muscle resistance to the force that changes its shape (Nm). This outcome measure is obtained by a device named MyotonPro. It is a non-invasive commercial device made to calculate myotonometrics properties of the muscle.	Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (4 week after last intervention)
Change in Decrement (elasticity)	Logarithmic decrement of the dampening of muscle oscillations is an indicator of the elasticity. This outcome measure is obtained by a device named MyotonPro. It is a non-invasive commercial device made to calculate myotonometrics properties of the muscle.	Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (4 week after last intervention)
Change in Neural Measures	To begin the test, patient must be seated with hands behind back to achieve a neutral spine. The first step is to have the patient slump forward at the thoracic and lumbar spine. If this position does not cause pain, patient must flex the neck by placing the chin on the chest and then extending one knee as much as possible. If extending the knee causes pain, patient must extend the neck into neutral. If the patient is still unable to extend the knee due to pain, the test is considered positive. If extending the knee does not cause pain, patient must do actively dorsiflexion of the ankle. If dorsiflexion causes pain, have the patient slightly flex the knee while still dorsiflexing. If the pain is reproduced, the test is considered positive.	Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (4 week after last intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Universidad San Jorge
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Maria Ortiz-Lucas, Universidad San Jorge

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 13, 2017
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 7, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 13, 2017
• First Posted (Actual): March 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): January 12, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 11, 2021
• Last Verified: January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Muscle Stretching Exercises; Electric Stimulation; Elasticity
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Congenital Abnormalities
• Other Study ID Numbers: 04/2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No