Uncemented Tritanium Compared With Cemented Metal-backed Tibia Components in Total Knee Replacement

March 30, 2023 updated by: Region Skane

Migration and Survival of the Uncemented Tritanium Tibia Compared With the Cemented Metal-backed Tibia Using the Triathlon Cruciate Retaining (CR) Total Knee System. A Single Centre RSA Study

The optimal method of total knee replacement component fixation to the bone remains a challenge. The use of bone cement is considered the gold standard and is the preferred technique for most surgeons. However, uncemented fixation methods have been developed in an attempt to tackle problems that can be seen when cement is used. The cement-bone interlock can deform and degrade over the years and can lead to aseptic loosening, especially in young and active patients. A loosened prosthesis results in an impaired functioning and painful knee in daily life for which a revision of the prosthesis may be necessary. To prevent aseptic loosening and subsequent revision surgery, new methods of uncemented fixation have been developed.

One of these methods is to use a highly porous metal called Tritanium®. It can improve the biologic fixation by resembling the characteristics of trabecular bone. It is expected that this surface aids bone ingrowth and to have similar or even better results concerning early fixation properties and long-term durability compared with cemented fixation. Excellent results using this highly porous Tritanium have been seen in total hip surgery already.

This single-blinded, randomized clinical trial will assess clinical and radiological outcomes including Roentgen Stereophotogrammetry (RSA) measurements of a newly approved uncemented Triathlon Tritanium CR total knee prosthesis compared with a standard cemented Triathlon metal-backed CR total knee prosthesis (both by Stryker Orthopaedics). Two arms of each 35 patients will be included.

The primary outcome measure will be prosthetic migration after two years of the uncemented Triathlon Tritanium CR Total Knee and the cemented Triathlon CR Total Knee by means of RSA. It is hypothesized that the new uncemented Tritanium prosthesis will perform at least equally good in terms of migration and clinical parameters compared with the standard cemented Triathlon.

The secondary outcome measure will be long-term (10-year) survival based on the two-year migration patterns combined with clinical factors and radiographic aspects. In order to identify other clinical parameters besides the fixation of the prosthesis components, clinical scores and radiographic aspects will be correlated with the RSA outcome. The 10-year results will be used to verify the predicted long-term survival results.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2300RC
        • Leiden University Medical Center
      • Hässleholm, Sweden, 28138
        • Department of Orthopaedics Hässleholm-Kristianstad-Ystad, Hässleholm Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is able to understand the meaning of the study and is willing to sign the Ethics Commission (EC) approved, study specific Informed Patient Consent Form.
  2. Patients eligible and scheduled to undergo primary total knee replacement with any of the following indication.

    • Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis (Ahlbäck stage II to V)
    • One or more compartments are involved.
  3. Ability and willingness to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level, and to return for follow-up evaluations.
  4. A good nutritional state of the patient.
  5. The subject is a male or non-pregnant female between 40 and 75 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is morbidly obese, defined as Body Mass Index (BMI) of > 37.
  2. Previous major knee surgery
  3. Patients who had a Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) on contralateral side within the last 6 months that is considered to have an unsatisfactory outcome. (Patients with contralateral TKA > 3 months ago with good outcome can be included in the study).
  4. Patients with other severe concurrent joint involvements that can affect their outcome.
  5. Patient has a flexion contracture of 15° and more.
  6. Patient has a varus/valgus contracture of 15° and more.
  7. The subject will be operated bilaterally.
  8. The subject has an active or suspected latent infection in or about the knee joint.
  9. Osteomyelitis
  10. The subject has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device.
  11. The subject has a systemic or metabolic disorder leading to progressive bone deterioration.
  12. The subject is immunologically suppressed or receiving steroids in excess of normal physiological requirements.
  13. Female patients planning a pregnancy during the course of the study.
  14. The patient is unable or unwilling to sign the Informed Consent specific to this study.

Secondary exclusion criteria: when there are less than five tibia-bone markers or less than three insert markers visible in the baseline RSA photograph and it will not improve by placing the patient in another position, the patient will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Uncemented Triathlon Tritanium CR
Primary total knee replacement with Uncemented Triathlon Tritanium CR Total Knee System
Primary Total Knee Replacement
Other Names:
  • Stryker Orthopaedics
Active Comparator: Cemented Triathlon CR
Primary total knee replacement with Cemented Triathlon CR Total Knee System
Primary Total Knee Replacement
Other Names:
  • Stryker Orthopaedics

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Migration, measured by means of RSA
Time Frame: 2 years
Migration (MTPM in mm) of the prosthesis with respect to the host bone measured by means of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA)
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Migration, measured by means of RSA
Time Frame: 10 years
Migration (MTPM in mm) of the prosthesis with respect to the host bone measured by means of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA)
10 years
Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with the Knee Society Score (KSS)
Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, range of motion (ROM) and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor," a higher value represents a better outcome.
pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) patient questionnaire
Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
KOOS consists of 5 subscales: Pain, other symptoms, function in daily living , function in sport and recreation and knee related quality of life (QOL). The previous week is the time period considered when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms).
pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with EuroQuol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) patient questionnaire
Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
The EQ-5D health questionnaire provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status.
pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) patient questionnaire.
Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
The FJS consists of 12 questions and focuses on the patients' awareness of their joint replacement during a range of day to day and recreational activities. The score has a range of 0-100.questionnaire
pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
Investigation of patient outcome with radiographic analysis
Time Frame: 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
Plain radiographs will be obtained for assessment of fixation of the device.
3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sören Toksvig-Larsen, Ass Prof, Department of Orthopaedics Hässleholm-Kristianstad-Ystad, Hässleholm Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • K-I-058

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on Uncemented Triathlon Tritanium CR Total Knee System

3
Subscribe