Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/Ritonavir, Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C

March 21, 2018 updated by: AbbVie

Real World Evidence (RWE) of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Poland (HCV RWE PMOS)

This study seeks to provide evidence of the effectiveness and obtain patient reported outcomes (PRO) and work productivity data of the interferon-free regimen of paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir (r) + ombitasvir (OBV), +/- dasabuvir (DSV), +/- ribavirin (RBV) in chronic hepatitis C virus infected patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

394

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment-naïve or -experienced adult male or female patients with confirmed CHC, genotype 1 or 4, receiving combination therapy with the interferon-free ABBVIE REGIMEN ± RBV according to standard of care and in line with the current local label.
  • If RBV is co-administered with the ABBVIE REGIMEN, it has been prescribed in line with the current local label (with special attention to contraception requirements and contraindication during pregnancy).
  • Patients must voluntarily sign and date a patient authorization to use and/or disclose his/her anonymized health data prior to inclusion into the study.
  • Patient must not be participating or intending to participate in a concurrent interventional therapeutic trial

Exclusion Criteria:

-None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin

Participants in this observational study received treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir (r) and ombitasvir with or without dasabuvir ± ribavirin (RBV) for 12 or 24 weeks for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC), according to hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype/subtype and stage of liver disease.

The prescription of treatment regimen was at the discretion of the physician in accordance with local clinical practice and label, was made independently from this observational study and preceded the decision to offer the patient the opportunity to participate in this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virological Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR12)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Relapse
Time Frame: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen) and up to 24 weeks after the end of treatment.
Relapse was defined as participants with a virologic response (VR; HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL) at end of treatment (EOT) followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL at any time after the end of treatment.
End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen) and up to 24 weeks after the end of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough
Time Frame: 12 or 24 weeks (depending on the treatment regimen)
Breakthrough was defined as at least one documented HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment.
12 or 24 weeks (depending on the treatment regimen)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Virological Response at End of Treatment
Time Frame: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Virologic response is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL.
End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Percentage of Participants With a Rapid Virological Response at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 4

Rapid virological response at week 4 (RVR4) was defined as participants with HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at week 4.

Due to the non-interventional character of the study, many participants did not have an HCV RNA assessed at treatment week 4 since this is not generally recommended in the label. Participants with missing data at the RVR4 time point were considered as virological failures.

Week 4
Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virological Response 24 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR24)
Time Frame: 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 36 or 48 depending on the treatment regimen)
Sustained virologic response is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
24 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 36 or 48 depending on the treatment regimen)
Percentage of Participants in the Core Population With Sufficient Follow-up Data for SVR12 Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR12)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)

Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.

The core population with sufficient follow-up data regarding SVR12 included all core population participants who

  • had evaluable HCV RNA data ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE regimen,
  • or a HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline
  • or had HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE regimen due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to adverse event) or virologic failure.
12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Percentage of Participants in Each Non-response Category 12 Weeks Post-treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)

SVR12 non-response was categorized according to the following:

  • Relapse, defined as HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at EOT followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL post-treatment in patients who completed treatment (not more than 7 days shortened);
  • Death;
  • Premature treatment discontinuation with no on-treatment virological failure;
  • Missing SVR12 data and/or none of the above criteria.
12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Assigned Treatment Regimen
Time Frame: Baseline
Treatment regimen was assigned by the physician according to local practice and label. Participants could receive two direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs (paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir) plus ribavirin (RBV) for either 12 or 24 weeks, or three DAAs (paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir) with or without RBV for 12 or 24 weeks.
Baseline
Percentage of the Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of DAA
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen

Adherence to study treatment was calculated as:

Cumulative dose taken / (initial prescribed dose * planned duration)

From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen
Percentage of the Ribavirin (RBV) Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of RBV
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen

Adherence to study treatment was calculated as:

Cumulative dose taken / (initial prescribed dose * planned duration)

From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen
Concomitant medication other than for chromic hepatitis C used from the time when the decision was made to initiate treatment with the ABBVIE REGIMEN until after the last dose.
From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or Pregnancies
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose. The median duration of treatment was 84 days.
From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose. The median duration of treatment was 84 days.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. The 5 items in the EQ-5D-5L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS).

Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score by applying country-specific weights.The range for EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 where '0' is defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health.The higher the score the better the health status.

Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. with a separate visual analog scale (VAS).

The VAS assesses overall health on a scale from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).

Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Absenteeism
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks post treatment

The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems.

Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks post treatment
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Presenteeism
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems.

Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Work Productivity Impairment (TWP)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Total work productivity impairment (TWP) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems.

Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Activity Impairment
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems.

Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 26, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 29, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 29, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Hepatitis C

3
Subscribe