Comparative Evaluation of Herbal and Allopathic Drugs for the Treatment of Chronic Diarrhea (HA)

December 30, 2015 updated by: Hafiz Muhammad Asif, Shifa Ul Mulk Memorial Hospital

Chemical, Biological and Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Entoban to Determine Safety and Efficacy for the Treatment of Chronic Diarrhea

Revival of significance and the emergent market of herbal medicinal products necessitate strong commitment by the stakeholders to safeguard the end users. The variability in the concentrations of constituents of plant material, coupled with the variety of extraction techniques and processing steps used by different manufacturers, results in distinct inconsistency in the quality of herbal products. The present study will be directed to a polyherbal formulation Entoban which integrates an outstanding blend of herbs that have been used for decades to eradicate microorganisms and worms from gastrointestinal tract. It is the combination of Holarrhena antidysenterica, Berberis aristata, Symplocos racemosa, Querecus infectoria and Helicteres isora. The current study would target the chemical assessment, pharmacological and comparative clinical evaluation of Entoban to assure its safety and efficacy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study will be adopted to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of Entoban using Metronidazole DS as a comparator. The study was carried out in XYZ hospital from Jan 2015 to Dec 2015. The participants will be selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusive criteria.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Karachi, Pakistan
        • Shifa ul mulk memorial hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female adults between the age of 18-60 years who were suffering from diarrhea of presumed infectious origin and willing to participate were eligible for inclusion in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria were the presence of chronic
  • Iatrogenic, or bloody diarrhea, having received antibiotic treatment for other medical or surgical problems
  • Having a history of renal or hepatic dysfunction
  • Having a concomitant infection.
  • Patients receiving treatment with an anti-diarrheal drug in the five days prior to the study were also excluded.
  • Pregnant or lactating women and women planning pregnancy were also ineligible for study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Entoban Capsules
Entoban is the combination of Holarrhena antidysenterica, Berberis aristata, Symplocos racemosa, Querecus infectoria and Helicteres isora.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of coded herbal formulation (Entoban) through randomized clinical study and compared with Metronidazole DS for treatment of gastrointestinal infections for improving the health of the community with due regard to the prevalence of disease and the feasibility of using alternative treatments.
Experimental: Metronidazole DS
Metronidazole DS(400 mg) is commonly used to treat diarrhea.It eliminates bacteria and other microorganisms that cause infections of the reproductive system, gastrointestinal tract, skin, vagina, and other areas of the body.
The data will be recorded for physical examination including gender , age, height, weight, temperature, heart rate ,respiratory rate and blood pressure of the subject, number of stool per day, stool with or without mucus or mixed with blood along with abdominal cramps, dehydration, nausea, vomiting and related clinical information will be carefully recorded. Statistical tools and tabulated results will be used to identify the similarities and differences in safety, efficacy and tolerability of treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stool D/R
Time Frame: 5 days
The primary efficacy criterion will be the frequency and consistency of diarrhea in hours, from the first treatment dose to recovery. It will be evaluated through stool D/R. Stool D/R described the consistency, frequency and other important features of stool. Semisolid stool consistency with 1-2/day will be considered significant.
5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvement in clinical symptoms such as abdominal pain, abdominal distension, etc will be secondary outcome measures
Time Frame: 5 days
5 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Diarrhea

3
Subscribe