Efficacy of a Smart Management Strategy for Health (SMASH) Program for Overcoming Cancer Crisis and Growing Positively

October 17, 2018 updated by: Young Ho Yun, Seoul National University Hospital

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Smart Management Strategy for Health (SMASH) Program for Overcoming Cancer Crisis and Growing Positively in Cancer Survivors

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the "Smart Management Strategy for Health (SMASH)" program, which is designed to help cancer patients overcome their cancer crisis proactively and grow positively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

<Hypothesis> This study hypothesizes that the intervention being provided (SMASH program) will demonstrate improvements in cancer survivors' health management in the fields of (i) physical activity, body mass index, and positive growth, (ii) self-management strategies of health (SMASH Assessment Tool; SAT), (iii) overall physical, mental, social, spiritual health conditions and Quality of Life (QoL), and (iv) the execution and maintenance of health habits ("10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior").

<Patient registry> Cancer survivors, who have just completed their cancer treatments (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy), will be recruited from five medical centers in Korea and randomly allocated to one of following three groups: 2 experiment groups and 1 attention control group. This recruitment process would start after the approval of protocol by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and proceed through following steps: (i) the physician in charge confirms that the patient has finished his or her treatment and determines whether the patient is eligible to participate in the study by checking the recent (less than one year) results of the patient's basic medical exams (blood pressure, body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, weight, and height) and basic lab tests (blood chemistry, electrocardiogram, chest PA, complete blood count, liver function test, BUN/Cr), (ii) A nurse explains the purpose and method of the study to the patient, and asks to complete informed consent form, (iii) the patient who agrees for participation will complete a brief screening questionnaire (Godin's Leisure Time Exercise, weight/height, and PostTraumatic Growth Inventory(PTGI)), (iv) the patient meeting the criteria as determined by the screening questionnaire is asked to complete the baseline assessment questionnaire at home, (v) cases who finish the baseline assessment questionnaire and meet all criteria are considered study participants and are randomly assigned to one of the three study arms.

<Quality control (patient data)> This study assumes that patients who are directly referred to the study by collaborating physicians are valid cancer cases. Data collected from study participants on screening forms will be reviewed by researchers at the central institution for missing responses and inconsistencies.

<Sample size>

The sample size of 477 participants was based upon the following assumptions:

  • a two-sided Type I error of 0.05
  • drop-out rate of 10%
  • an attainment of goal behavior of 5% in the active comparator arm and 20% in the experiment arm, and a power of 90% to detect a between-arm difference

<Statistical analysis plan > The primary endpoint was based on three-outcome composite achievement of PA, weight and PTGI score at 12 months. All analyses will be conducted on the basis of intention-to-treat. Arm differences at 3, 6, and 12 months in behavior change (physical activity, body mass index, posttraumatic growth) will be tested with logistic regression, controlling for the respective baseline values. Arm differences in levels of Mini Dietary Assessment Index (MDI), execution of health habits, SMASH Assessment Tool (SAT), Quality of Life (QoL), health condition, incurred medical expenses, incurred Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) expenses will be explored using a mixed model that estimates the effect of SMASH program over time, which will correlate repeated observations on particular participants after adjustment for baseline scores.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

394

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 06351
        • Sung Kim
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 07985
        • Eun Mi Nam
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
        • Kyung Hae Jung
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Ilsan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 10408
        • Eun Sook Lee

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aware of one's diagnosis of breast, lung, colorectal or gastric cancer
  • less than 2 months has passed since one's completion of primary cancer treatment (including surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy)

  • Performs poorly at baseline on at least one goal behavior, which includes the followings:

    (i) moderate exercise ≥150 min/week or strenuous exercise ≥75 min/week (*exception: ≥12.5 MET-hr/week for lung cancer patients) (ii) BMI within normal range (18.5-22.9) (*exception: ≥18.5 for lung cancer patients) (iii) Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) score ≥72

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to speak or write Korean
  • Medical conditions that would limit adherence to an unsupervised health management program (as confirmed by their referring physician; e.g. major depression, dyspnea)
  • Currently pregnant or planning to be within the next year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Online program & Health coaching
This group is provided with "Online health management program", "Health coaching" and "Workshop".
Behavioral: Online health management program

Web-based health management program designed according to SMASH strategy, which includes (i) Assessment, (ii) Acceptance, (iii) Preparation for change, (iv) Commitment, (v) Planning, (vi) Promoting environment, (vii) Execution, (viii) Feedback and Maintenance, and (ix) Core perspectives, for 6 months.

The program consists of four areas: self-assessment, self-planning, self-learning, and self-monitoring. The learning session includes SMASH strategies and "10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior".

Other Names:
  • "Healthing U"
Behavioral: Health coaching
Personalized tele-coaching for 6 months by health coaches who were trained by the Smart Management and Coaching for Health (SMACH) program
Behavioral: Workshop
Total three sessions are to be held at 3-, 5-, and 7-month after the initiation of the enrollment. Each session includes 30-minute health education, 1-hour health management strategy workshop, and 30-minute team coaching.
Other Names:
  • Group education
Experimental: Online program
This group is provided with "Online health management program".
Behavioral: Online health management program

Web-based health management program designed according to SMASH strategy, which includes (i) Assessment, (ii) Acceptance, (iii) Preparation for change, (iv) Commitment, (v) Planning, (vi) Promoting environment, (vii) Execution, (viii) Feedback and Maintenance, and (ix) Core perspectives, for 6 months.

The program consists of four areas: self-assessment, self-planning, self-learning, and self-monitoring. The learning session includes SMASH strategies and "10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior".

Other Names:
  • "Healthing U"
Active Comparator: Enhanced Usual Care
This group is provided with "Standard health educational booklet".
Behavioral: Standard health educational booklet

Standard health educational booklets about "10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior" that are organized according to the Trans-theoretical Model (TTM).

Booklets are provided at 0-, 2-, and 4-month after the enrollment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in percentage of patients meeting the exercise goal
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months]
moderate exercise for ≥150 min/week or strenuous exercise for ≥75 min/week (* ≥12.5 MET-hr/week for lung cancer patients; no limit on exercise strength)
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months]
Change in percentage of patients meeting the body mass index (BMI) goal
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
BMI in kg/m^2 goal 18.5-22.9 (≥18.5 for lung cancer patients)
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in percentage of patients meeting the posttraumatic growth inventory (PTGI) goal
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months
General is a quality of life measure with higher scores indicating better quality of life (range 0-105)
3, 6, and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in percentage of patients meeting diet goal
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Mini Dietary assessment Index (MDI) score ≥ 80
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in execution level of health habits
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in level of anxiety and depression
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
We measured psychologic distress with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which consists of 14 items (7 for anxiety and 7 for depression).
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in level of fatigue
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) scale, which consists of 9 items that rate fatigue severity and interference on a 0-to-10 scale,
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in level of self-management strategy
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
We assessed the SM strategies of health with the SMASH Assessment Tool (SAT), which is a three-set, 16-factor, 91-item tool (i.e., the core strategies with 28 items, preparation strategies with 30 items, and implementation strategies with 33 items) that assesses the patients' ability to overcome their health-related crisis.
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in level of social support and spiritual well-being
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
The social support (2 items) and spiritual (6 items) scales of the McGill Quality of Life (McGill QOL)
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Cost effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Cost effectiveness analysis
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Collaborators

National Cancer Center, Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Asan Medical Center
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Young Ho Yun, MD. PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • YHYun

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stomach Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Online health management program

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Pakistan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe