Ciclesonide vs Fluticasone Nasal Sprays in Nasal Poplyposis

January 25, 2016 updated by: Mohsen Naraghi, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Ciclesonide vs Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Sprays in Patients With Nasal Poplyposis; a Randomized Clinical Trial

This study is designed to compare ciclesonide nasal spray once daily with fluticasone propionate aquas nasal spray BD, which is commonly prescribed in patients with nasal polyposis, in order to relieve symptoms of these patients.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

The study will be conducted in a tertiary ENT center in Tehran. Endoscopic severity grades for patients will be determined for polyps on the basis of 3 point classification system: 1, confined to middle meatus; 2, below level of middle turbinate; 3, causing total obstruction. Also, patients will be undergone paranasal sinus CT scan to determine Lund-Mackay stage which defined by sum of scores of each of 12 paranasal sinuses (0 for a completely lucent, 1 for a partially opaque and 2 for a completely opaque sinus). Patients will be randomized to treat in one of two groups: 1 month of therapy with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) 200 µg twice a day or 1 month of therapy with intranasal ciclesonide spray 200 µg once daily. All patients will be given written, easy to understand instruction about how to use nasal sprays. All included patients are asked to answer the disease specific Persian language validated SNOT20 quality of life questionnaire to evaluate symptom severity before starting the treatment. SNOT20 is a symptom severity and health related quality of life measure in sinonasal diseases that contains 20 questions about CRS related symptoms. Symptoms severity is scored 0, indicating no problem to 5, indicating worst possible symptom. Then scores of each of 20 items will be added to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 100. After one month of treatment patients will be visited by a blind physician to assess the symptoms. Then patients will answer the SNOT20 questionnaire again. Patients will be given a chance to report any problem during drug administration and enquired about adverse effects at the end of 1 month of treatment by the physician. Withdrawals is defined as any drug or study discontinuation due to adverse effects or lack of efficacy.

By considering 5% level of significance, to have 90% power to detect a clinically important difference of 0.6 points between two groups in improving total score of SNOT20 assuming a standard deviation (SD) of 0.6, we should include 22 cases in each study arm. To address a 10% probable loss to follow up, we would recruit 24 cases in each arm.

The continuous variables will be shown as mean ± SD. The categorical variables will be presented as frequency and percentage. The normality of measure outcome variables will be tested graphically as well as statistically with the Shapiro-Wilk test. In case of normal distribution we would use parametric t-test to compare the mean values between two groups. Otherwise we would use non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Chi-squared or Fischer-exact tests will be used to compare categorical variables. All the statistical analyses will be conducted using IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 23.0, (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

32

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with the diagnosis of symptomatic nasal polyposis included.
  • Objective confirmation of chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps was done by paranasal sinuses CT scan and Endoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Administration of systemic corticosteroids during last 3 months Administration of antihistamines, nasal steroids 15 days prior the including to the study.
  • History of surgical treatment during last 3 month.
  • History of septal deviation, severe epistaxis, cystic fibrosis, severe or non-controlled asthma, current purulent nasal infection, allergic rhinitis.
  • Hypersensitivity or contraindication to steroids.
  • Any positive history that was suspected to influence study parameters.
  • NP requiring systemic corticosteroids or daily use of saline irrigations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ciclesonide
intranasal ciclesonide spray 200 µg once daily
Active Comparator: Fluticasone
fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 µg twice a day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SNOT20 score difference
Time Frame: 1 Month
The change from the baseline in SNOT20 total score after the treatment period
1 Month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SNOT20 score difference in variuos endoscopic grades
Time Frame: 1 Month
The change from the baseline in SNOT20 total score after the treatment period in patients with various endoscopic grades
1 Month
SNOT20 score difference in variuos Lund-Mackay score
Time Frame: 1 Month
The change from the baseline in SNOT20 total score after the treatment period in patients with various paranasanl sinus CT Scan's Lund-Mackay scores
1 Month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohsen Naraghi, MD, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran, Iran

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Rhinosinustis With Polyps

Clinical Trials on Ciclesonide

Subscribe