Accelerated Rule Out of Myocardial Infarction (AROMI)

April 13, 2022 updated by: Christian Juhl Terkelsen, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Accelerated Rule-Out of Acute Myocardial Infarction, Using Copeptin and High Sensitive Troponin T - the AROMI Trial

Every year > 50.000 people in Denmark are hospitalized with a suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The majority has other explanations of their chest discomfort and most are discharged again without any initiation of treatment. Still, the suspicion dictates acute ambulance deployment, hospital admission to a highly specialized cardiac unit, cardiac surveillance and cardiac troponin blood sampling. The novel biomarker copeptin, a byproduct of vasopressin production, is released immediately from the pituitary gland as part of the hormonal response to AMI. Peak concentrations are reached within the first hour. Previous studies have suggested the combination of copeptin and cardiac troponin for fast and reliable rule out of AMI. However, the blood sampling should be performed as soon as possible after symptom onset, preferably already during the prehospital phase.

We aim, in an open randomized setting, to investigate the combined measurement of prehospital copeptin and in-hospital high sensitive cardiac Troponin T compared to the standard rule-out procedure of suspected myocardial infarction. We hypothesize that the combined measurement of prehospital copeptin and in-hospital high sensitive troponin T:

  1. Reduces admission time by 1.5 hours in patients where AMI is ruled out
  2. Reduces the time to disposition
  3. Is non-inferior compared to the standard rule-out procedure in relation to major adverse cardiovascular events.
  4. Is more cost efficient compared to standard diagnostic strategy

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients with suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) constitute one of the largest patient groups in emergency medicine. The majority of these patients, however, have other causes than AMI, for their chest discomfort and many are discharged again without any initiation of treatment.(1) At present, cardiac troponin is gold standard in diagnosing AMI. Diagnostic levels of troponin are not reached until hours after onset of symptoms and serial sampling is recommended at intervals of 3-6 hours to confirm or rule-out AMI. The novel biomarker copeptin, a by-product of vasopressin production, is released immediately from the pituitary gland as part of the hormonal response to AMI. However, copeptin elevation, is not specific of AMI. Peak concentrations of copeptin are reached within the first hour and the values normalizes within 4-10 hours.(3) Previous studies have suggested the combination of copeptin and high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) for early and reliable rule-out of AMI.(2,3,6) These studies are based on copeptin measurement in blood sample acquired at hospital admission. However, because of the rapid release of copeptin, the blood sampling should be performed as early as possible after symptom onset, preferably already in the ambulance, whereas the analysis can be performed after arrival at the hospital because copeptin is stable. The PREHAB trial conducted in the Central Denmark Region, documented that prehospital blood sampling is performed 70 minutes earlier than first in-hospital sample.(5) Post-trial analysis of blood samples from the PREHAP trial has demonstrated the potential for early and safe rule-out of AMI using the combination of prehospital copeptin and in-hospital troponin analysis. AMI could potentially be safely, ruled out in approximately 40-50% of patients, in whom the AMI diagnosis eventually was dismissed.

During the last 7 years, studies have evaluated the effect and validity of prehospital blood sample analysis. This is now standard procedure in The Central Denmark Region, Denmark.(5) Currently, prehospital blood sampling is carried out in two major randomized studies, aiming at identifying patients with myocardial infarction and heart failure (NCT01638806 and NCT02050282).

Unfortunately, there is at present no point-of-care analysis equipment for copeptin available. Manufacturer of copeptin analysis equipment, Thermo Fischer, has informed that the development of point-care-care equipment is in process, but will not be available in near future. Therefore, we will perform in-hospital analysis of the prehospital blood samples.

Overall aim of this protocol is to demonstrate the combination of troponin T and copeptin as a safe and effective biomarker for rule-out of AMI. In a randomized setting, we will compare the combination of prehospital copeptin and in hospital hs-cTnT, to the standard diagnostic procedure in patients with suspected AMI, evaluating rule-out potential and potential for reduction of the length of stay at the hospital. The diagnostic effects of measuring copeptin/ hs-cTnT in prehospital vs in-hospital blood samples will be evaluated. Moreover an other diagnostic rule-out strategy, using hs-cTNT at admission and 1 hour after admission, will be evaluated in retrospective analysis of blood samples acquired from patients in the conventional diagnostics arm of the study.

Primary purposes of the AROMI trial:

  1. To evaluate if early discharge, based in the combined biomarker analysis is associated to duration of hospital stay. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after rule out of AMI(discharged within 12 hours) in 900 patients (300 patients in each site)
  2. To evaluate if early discharge, based in the combined biomarker analysis is associated to major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during index admission, after discharge, within 30, 90, and 365 days of randomization (separately or in combination). No interim evaluation of MACE.

Secondary purposes of the AROMI trial:

  1. To evaluate if early discharge, based in the combined biomarker analysis is associated to time to decision of discharge or continued hospitalization. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after rule out of AMI(discharged within 12 hours) in 900 patients (300 patients in each site)
  2. To evaluate if early discharge, based in the combined biomarker analysis is cost-effective regarding satisfaction and safety from a patients perspective.
  3. To evaluate if early discharge, based in the combined biomarker analysis is cost-effective from a public perspective, regarding staff resources, costs of hospital stay, adherence to the labour market, and use of other healthcare services, Cost benefit analysis(CBA).
  4. To evaluate if early discharge, based on the hs-cTnT analysis at arrival and 1 hour after arrival at hospital is associated to duration of hospital stay.
  5. To evaluate if early discharge, based on the hs-cTnT analysis at arrival and 1 hour after arrival at hospital is associated to MACE(major adverse cardiac event) during index admission, after discharge, within 30, 90, and 365 days of randomization (separately or in combination).
  6. To evaluate the diagnostic properties (including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value) of the accelerated rule out algorithm using copeptin and high sensitivity troponin. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after rule out of AMI(discharged within 12 hours) in 900 patients (300 patients in each site). Will be evaluated in the total cohort (since both prehospital and inhospital copeptin and high sensitivity troponin is available in all patients) and randomization will not be revealed during this evaluation.
  7. To evaluate the prognostic value of the accelerated rule out algorithm using copeptin and high sensitivity troponin. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after rule out of AMI(discharged within 12 hours) in 900 patients (300 patients in each site). Will be evaluated in the total cohort (since both prehospital and inhospital copeptin and high sensitivity troponin is available in all patients) and randomization will not be revealed during this evaluation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4516

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital
      • Horsens, Denmark, 8700
        • Department of Internal Medicine, Horsens Regional Hospital
    • Central Denmark Region
      • Viborg, Central Denmark Region, Denmark, 8800
        • Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients which, after telemedical triage, are admitted to a cardiac department in suspicions of myocardial infarction
  • A peripheral venous catheter has been inserted prehospitally and blood has drawn from it, before flushing it.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below 18 years
  • Patients in which an informed concent can not be obtained (psychiatric disease, dementia, under influence of drugs etc.),
  • Suspected STEMI and referral to Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), referral to a highly specialized cardiac department for another cardiac reason (e.g ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, 3° Atrio-ventricular block.)
  • Known central Diabetes insipidus
  • Other diagnosis as obvious reason for symptoms at time of admittance (e.g. a new diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection) AND no suspicions of ACS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Conventional diagnostic strategy

Standard Diagnostics for suspected myocardial infarction, including standard biochemical analysis: min. two measurements of high sensitive troponin T with an interval of minimum 3 hours.

A normal value of high sensitive cardiac troponin-T in both blood samples rules out AMI and the patients can be discharged immediately if no other conditions are suspected.
Experimental: Accelerated diagnostic strategy
'Accelerated, combined biomarker rule-out strategy for MI'. Copeptin measurement in a prehospital blood sample combined with high sensitive cardiac troponin T measurement in the first blood sample upon hospital admission, A normal value of both copeptin and cardiac troponin rules out AMI and the patients can be discharged immediately if no other conditions are suspected.
Procedure: Accelerated, combined biomarker rule-out strategy for MI
Blood sample is acquired while the patient is in the ambulance. This is brought to hospital and handed over to the laboratory personnel for acute analysis for copeptin level. At arrival to hospital, a second blood sample is acquired and analyzed for high-sensitive cardiac troponin-T(hs-cTnT). Answers of these analyzes are in-hand with-in 60 minutes. If copeptin in the pre-hospital blood sample is <9,8 pmol/L (95% percentile) AND hs-cTnT in the in-hospital blood sample is <14ng/L (99% percentile), then myocardial infarction can be ruled out, and depending of clinical presentation, the patient can be discharged.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to three months from randomization
Time (hours and minutes) from admission to discharge from cardiac department. Reported by clinical personnel in registration form and supplemented by data from the national health registry. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after inclusion of 300 patients in each site.
Up to three months from randomization
Combined MACE
Time Frame: Within time from randomization to 30 days after randomization
Combined endpoint of major adverse cardiac events, consisting of: "All-cause mortality", "survived cardiac arrest", "Confirmed or Readmission with Acute Coronary Syndrome(ACS)", "Non-scheduled coronary intervention", and "Life-threatening arrhythmias" (see below for description) occuring within time from randomization to 30 days after randomization
Within time from randomization to 30 days after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to disposition
Time Frame: Within 24 h of randomization
Time from admission to decision of early discharge or continued admission for further diagnostics or treatment. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after inclusion of 300 patients in each site.
Within 24 h of randomization
Combined MACE
Time Frame: Within index admission, within time from discharge to 30, 90, and 365 days after randomization, and within time from randomization to 90 and 365 days after randomization
Combined endpoint of major adverse cardiac events, consisting of: "All-cause mortality", "survived cardiac arrest", "Readmission with Acute Coronary Syndrome(ACS)", "Non-scheduled coronary intervention", and "Life-threatening arrhythmias" (see below for description)
Within index admission, within time from discharge to 30, 90, and 365 days after randomization, and within time from randomization to 90 and 365 days after randomization
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization
All-cause mortality registered in the national health registry, occurring from time of admission to discharge, within 30, 90 or 365 days after randomization.
Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization
Survived, cardiac arrest
Time Frame: Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization
Survived cardiac arrest is determined from registration of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in "Danish register of cardiac arrest" or in-hospital cardiac arrest in "Danarrest" or in the national health registry, occurring from time of admission to discharge, within 30, 90 or 365 days after randomization. The endpoint committee adjudicate survived cardiac arrest, blinded to the initial randomization.
Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization
Confirmed diagnosis of ACS or readmission with ACS
Time Frame: Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization
The national health registry is used to determine whether the patient is confirmed of having or readmitted with acute coronary syndrome, from time of admission to discharge and within 30, 90 or 365 days after randomization. The endpoint committee adjudicate readmission with acute coronary syndrome, blinded to the initial randomization. The "2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation" and "Universal definition of Myocardial infarction" will be used to evaluate if the patient had: ACS, and subsequently classify it as a: a) Unstable angina pectoris(UAP), b) non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NONSTEMI), c) ST-Elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) d) Bundle branch block myocardial infarction (BBBMI)
Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization
Non-scheduled coronary intervention
Time Frame: Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization
The national health registry is used to determine whether the patient has non-scheduled re-intervention performed (re-intervention not scheduled at index admission). Time from index admission to first re-intervention and type of re-intervention (PCI or CABG) is determined. The endpoint committee adjudicate re-interventions blinded to original treatment strategy
Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization
Life-threatening arrhythmias
Time Frame: Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization
The national health registry is used to determine whether the patient is diagnosed or readmitted with a life-threatening arrhythmia, defined as ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or third-degree(total) atrioventricular block within index admission and within 30, 90 or 365 days of randomization. The endpoint committee adjudicate readmission with life-threatening arrhythmia, blinded to the initial randomization.
Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost efficiency
Time Frame: Within index admission, and 1 year after randomization
Costs and cost effectiveness will be evaluated and compared between the two diagnostic strategies.
Within index admission, and 1 year after randomization
Risk factors and patient experiences
Time Frame: Within index admission, and 1 year after randomization
The patients experience of being discharged earlier and risk factors for early readmission.
Within index admission, and 1 year after randomization
Myocardial injury
Time Frame: Within index admission
The laboratory registries is used to determine whether the patient has troponin elevation, from time of admission to discharge. The endpoint committee adjudicate myocardial injury, blinded to the initial randomization. "Universal definition of Myocardial infarction" will be used to evaluate the event.
Within index admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Carsten Stengaard, MD, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
  • Study Chair: Hanne M Soendergaard, MD, PhD, Viborg Regional Hospital
  • Study Chair: Christian J Terkelsen, MD, DmSc, Associate prof., Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
  • Study Chair: Karen K Dodt, MD, PhD, Horsens Regional Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 3, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AROMI-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Bahamas

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe