Efficacy of Combined Ultrasound Guided Steroid Injection and Splinting in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

To compare the effectiveness of ultrasound guided-steroid injection plus splinting to that of steroid injection alone using clinical and electrophysiological parameters in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled study. Patient with CTS were randomly assigned to group receiving ultrasound guided steroid injection and group receiving ultrasound guided corticosteroid injection and splinting. The steroid injection was using 1ml of 10 mg (10mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort) mixed with 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine). The inclusion criteria included an age of more than 18 years and typical signs of CTS according to American Academy of Neurology criteria lasting for at least 3 months. The diagnosis of CTS was confirmed by electrophysiological tests.The exclusion criteria included the following: presence of thenar atrophy; existence of disorders such as hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, or rheumatoid arthritis; any accompanying orthopedic or neurologic disorders that could mimic CTS such as cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, proximal median nerve entrapment, or thoracic outlet syndrome; prior steroid injection into the affected carpal tunnel or carpal tunnel surgery; history of distal radius fracture; pregnancy or lactation; regular use of systemic NSAIDs or corticosteroids; and known allergy to corticosteroids and local anesthetics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. clinical diagnosis of CTS
  2. The diagnosis of CTS was confirmed by electrophysiological tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. presence of thenar atrophy
  2. existence of disorders such as hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, or rheumatoid arthritis; any accompanying orthopedic or neurologic disorders that could mimic CTS such as cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, proximal median nerve entrapment, or thoracic outlet syndrome
  3. prior steroid injection into the affected carpal tunnel or carpal tunnel surgery
  4. history of distal radius fracture
  5. pregnancy or lactation
  6. regular use of systemic NSAIDs or corticosteroids
  7. known allergy to corticosteroids and local anesthetics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: experimental: steroid injection and splinting
ultrasound-guided steroid injection using 1ml of 10 mg (10mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort) mixed with 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine) and a customized volar thermoplastic wrist splint
ultrasound-guided injection using 1ml of 10 mg (10mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort)
Other Names:
  • triamcinolone acetonide 10mg/ml (shincort, YSP, Taiwan)
thermoplastic wrist splint with wrist placed in a neutral position
ultrasound-guided injection using 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)
Other Names:
  • lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)
Active Comparator: steroid injection
ultrasound-guided steroid injection using 1ml of 10 mg (10mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort) mixed with 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)
ultrasound-guided injection using 1ml of 10 mg (10mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort)
Other Names:
  • triamcinolone acetonide 10mg/ml (shincort, YSP, Taiwan)
ultrasound-guided injection using 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)
Other Names:
  • lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in the scores on the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BQ).
Time Frame: at 2, 6, 12 weeks
The BQ was interviewed-administered to assess the severity of symptoms and functional status.
at 2, 6, 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Median nerve distal motor latency
Time Frame: at 2, 6, 12 weeks
or the motor studies, the CMAPs were obtained via surface electrodes placed on the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. The active recording electrode was placed on the muscle belly, and the reference electrode was placed on the tendon insertion. The median nerve was stimulated 8 cm proximal to the active recording electrode. Distal motor latencies were measured from the onset of stimulus artifact to the onset of the CMAP
at 2, 6, 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in sensory nerve conduction velocity
Time Frame: at 2, 6, 12 weeks
SNAPs were obtained using an antidromic method and recorded by surface electrodes placed at the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints of the index finger for the median nerve and the same joints of the little finger for the ulnar nerve. The median nerves were stimulated at the wrist at a distance of 14 cm from the wrist to the active electrode. Distal sensory latencies were measured from the onset of the stimulus artifact to the onset of the SNAP. SNCV was calculated dividing the distance of 14 cm by the distal sensory latency.
at 2, 6, 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in compound muscle action potential amplitude (CMAP)
Time Frame: at 2, 6, 12 weeks
the CMAPs were obtained via surface electrodes placed on the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. The active recording electrode was placed on the muscle belly, and the reference electrode was placed on the tendon insertion. The median nerve was stimulated 8 cm proximal to the active recording electrode. The amplitude of CMAP were measured from baseline to negative peak.
at 2, 6, 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in sensory nerve action potential amplitudes.
Time Frame: at 2, 6, 12 weeks
SNAPs were obtained using an antidromic method and recorded by surface electrodes placed at the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints of the index finger for the median nerve and the same joints of the little finger for the ulnar nerve. The median nerves were stimulated at the wrist at a distance of 14 cm from the wrist to the active electrode. The amplitude of SNAP were measured from baseline to negative peak.
at 2, 6, 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in self-reported pain intensity
Time Frame: at 2, 6, 12 weeks
Patients were asked to indicate the intensity of their average level of pain for the wrist-hand region within the past 1 week, using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
at 2, 6, 12 weeks
change from Baseline in Cross sectional area
Time Frame: at 2, 6, 12 weeks
The CSA of the median nerve was measured using ultrasound at 2 levels: at the carpal tunnel inlet (CSA-I; immediately prior to the proximal margin of the flexor retinaculum) and in the mid-carpal tunnel (CSA-M; at the level of the pisiform bone and scaphoid tubercle). The CSA within the surrounding hyperechoic rim was measured. The CSA was measured using a continuous boundary trace of the nerve and was directly calculated using the area measurement software included with the ultrasonography device
at 2, 6, 12 weeks
change from Baseline in flattening ratio
Time Frame: at 2, 6, 12 weeks
The flattening ratio was measured only at the mid-tunnel (FR-M) using ultrasound. FR was calculated by dividing the horizontal diameter of the nerve by the vertical diameter.
at 2, 6, 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Triamcinolone Acetonide

Subscribe