Backward Treadmill Training in Patients With Chronic Stroke

Effects of Backward Treadmill Training on Spasticity and Gait Ability in Patients With Chronic Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Gait impairment is a common cause of disability in patients who have experienced a stroke and recovery of walking is a priority goal. Gait outcome is a significant factor that influences a patient's chance of returning to the social life activity and rehabilitation is an effective treatment for restoring gait in these patients. Learning to walk backwards correctly has been recommended to improve the movement components required for walking forwards. Several studies demonstrated that during backward walking the muscle activity is higher, more oxygen consumption, metabolic and cardiorespiratory activity are required and the same motor program is used comparing to during the forward walking. It has been suggested that backward walking therapy may be promoted as a treatment strategy to improve gait in stroke patients.

The main goal of this project is to investigate the effectiveness of the backward walking therapy on gait improvement and spasticity in post stroke patients.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Stroke
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Backward Walking Treadmill Training; Other: Treadmill Training

Detailed Description

Loss of walking ability is a one of the major problem after stroke and recovery of walking is a priority goal for most patients. Several studies demonstrated that rehabilitation could be an effective treatment on improving gait following stroke. Learning to walk backwards correctly has been recommended to improve the movement components required for walking forwards. Backward walking, therefore, has been promoted as a treatment strategy to improve gait. During backward walking the same motor programme is used as during forward walking, but possibly running in reverse. It has been suggested that backward walking may offer some benefits beyond those experienced through forward walking alone. Backward walking appears to create more muscle activity in proportion to effort than forward walking. This suggests a greater level of energy expenditure in backward walking than in forward walking. Additionally, backward walking also demands a greater oxygen consumption, metabolic response and cardiorespiratory than forward walking. Up to our knowledge, only two studies demonstrated the positive effects of an additional backward walking training in post stroke patients. Yang and coll. examined the effectiveness of additional backward walking training on gait outcome of 25 subacute stroke patients and they demonstrated that asymmetric gait pattern could improve. In a recently study, a randomized control trail was conducted on 36 acute stroke patients evaluating the efficacy of a walk backwards on a treadmill. The patients were randomly allocated to three groups and they received 3 weeks of intervention: first group (n=12) underwent partial body weight support treadmill training in backwards, the second group (n=12) received partial body weight support treadmill training and the third group underwent conventional rehabilitation training. The results showed significant improvements in walking speed and in the rivermead Mobility Index, suggesting that Partial Body Weight Support treadmill backward training for patients in the early phase of acute stroke is effective at improving mobility.

Recently, gait rehabilitation methods in patients with neurological impairment have relied on technological devices, which drive the patient's gait in a body-weight support condition and emphasize the beneficial role of repetitive practice. The rationale for these approaches originates from animal studies which have shown that repetition of gait movements may enhance spinal and supraspinal locomotor circuits.

Two reviews concludes that treadmill training with partial body weight support is effective to improve walking speed and endurance without worsening gait quality

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 20
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Alessandro Picelli, MD; Phone Number: +39 045 8124573; Email: alessandro.picelli@univr.it
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Daniele Munari, PhD; Phone Number: +39 045 8124573; Email: daniele.munari@univr.it

Study Locations

• Italy
  • Italy, Verona
    • Verona, Italy, Verona, Italy, 37134
      • Recruiting
      • Azienta Ospedaliera, SSO Rehabilitation Unit, Verona
      • Contact: Nicola Smania; Phone Number: +39 0458124573; Email: nicola.smania@univr.it
      • Contact: Daniele Munari; Phone Number: +39 0458124573; Email: daniele.munari@univr.it
      • Principal Investigator: Nicola Smania Nicola Smania

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosis of ischemia brain injury or intracerebral hemorrhage by MRI or computed tomography at least 6 months before the onset of the study;
• age between 18 and 75 years;
• ability to walk independently for at least 15 meters;
• Functional Ambulatory Category level score 2 or less;
• Ability to walk in the treadmill at >0.3 km/h for 3 minutes handrail support;

Exclusion Criteria:

• presence of other concurrent neurological or orthopaedic diseases involving the lower limbs and/or interfering with standing position and/or walking;
• aphasia with inability to follow 2 consecutive step commands, or a cognitive deficit;
• any uncontrolled health condition for which exercise is contraindicated
• Mini Mental State Examination <20;
• Unstable angina pectoris;
• Unstable cardiac conditions;
• Complex ventricular arrhythmia;
• Resting systolic blood pressure >200 mm/Hg - Resting diastolic blood pressure >100 mm/Hg;
• Aphasia (unable to follow two commands);

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Backward Walking Treadmill Training; The subjects will perform a backward walking training on treadmill device	Other: Backward Walking Treadmill Training; The intervention will consist of 5 minutes of forward walking (warm-up phase), 10 minutes of backward walking (intervention phase) and 5 minutes of forward walking (cool-down phase). The session will be performed on a treadmill device. The backward training speed will be increase consecutively: during the week 1, the intervention will be performed at 0,8 km/h; during the week 2 the speed will be 1,0 km/h; finally, during the week 3 the speed will be increased till 1,2 km/h.
Active Comparator: Treadmill training; The subjects will perform a walking training on treadmill device	Other: Treadmill Training; The intervention will consist of 20 minutes of forward walking on a treadmill device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
10 meters Walking test (10-MtWT) change in gait speed	the test has been selected as a measure of gait speed. This is a validated test requiring individuals to walk on a flat hard floor at their fastest speed foe 10 meters. Scoring is walking speed.	Baseline time 0 and up to 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Gait analysis	It is an electronic system used for the gathering of the temporal-spatial data of deambulation. It is made up of an 8 meter long walkway connected to a computer. The system records the signal, reproducing the pressure maps of each step on video, identifying the progression of the center of gravity and recording all of the temporal-spatial features of gait.	Baseline time 0 and up to 16 weeks
Stroke Impact scale	this 64-item questionnaire is self- administered, with each item scored on a 5-point Likert scale, and assesses 8 domains of stroke.	Baseline time 0 and up to 16 weeks
Health Survey Questionnaire short form 36	this is a multi- purpose, short form health survey with only 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and preference-based health index. It is a generic measure, as opposed to one that targets a specific age, disease or treatment group.	Baseline time 0 and up to 16 weeks
Modified Ashworth Scale		Baseline time 0 and up to 16 weeks
Modified "Tardieu" Scale	Tardieu is a scale for measuring spasticity that takes into account resistance to passive movement at both slow and fast speed. The scale originally began development in the 1950s and has gone through multiple revisions (reviewed in Haugh 2006	Baseline time 0 and up to 16 weeks
Body's Centre of Pressure length (mm)	the static balance will be carried out with a monaxial platform, an electronic system used for the evaluation of the length of the centre of pressure (CoP)	Baseline time 0 and up to 16 weeks
Body's Centre of Pressure Area Path (mm2)	the static balance will be carried out with a monaxial platform, an electronic system used for the evaluation of the area path of the centre of pressure (CoP)	Baseline time 0 and up to 16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Universita di Verona
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Nicola Nicola, MD, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Center Department of Neurological, Neuropsychological, Morfological and Motor Sciences University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: April 1, 2016
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): November 1, 2016
• Study Completion (Anticipated): December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 23, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 11, 2016
• First Posted (Estimate): March 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): September 7, 2016
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 6, 2016
• Last Verified: September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Gait; Randomized controlled trial; Chronic Stroke; Treadmill training
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Cardiovascular Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Stroke
• Other Study ID Numbers: BWTreadmillSTROKE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No