Infraclavicular Block: Decreased Incidence of Tourniquet Pain, Compared to Axillary Brachial Plexus Block?

August 19, 2017 updated by: Dr. David Brenner, Cork University Hospital

The Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Block: Decreased Incidence of Tourniquet Pain, Compared to Axillary Brachial Plexus Block?

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the incidence of tourniquet pain is decreased if infraclavicular nerve block is administered, compared to axillary brachial plexus block, for surgical interventions at the level or distal to the elbow.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Pneumatic tourniquets are often used in orthopedic surgery to ensure bloodless surgical field. Besides their obvious positive effects, arterial tourniquets have some unfavorable properties. One of these is tourniquet pain, which can manifest in the presence of an otherwise adequate neuraxial or peripheral nerve block. If it develops, it is usually difficult to manage, and can be severe enough to necessitate conversion to general anaesthesia.

In the past the incidence of tourniquet pain, associated with different nerve blocks has been estimated in clinical trials for which it was a secondary outcome measure. One recent meta-analysis addressed the question: is infraclavicular block (ICB) associated with a lesser incidence of tourniquet pain compared to other brachial plexus blocks. The studies selected by this meta-analysis used different types of nerve block. However it did not address the clinically relevant question: using standard techniques for ultrasound guided brachial plexus block (USgBPB) is the infraclavicular approach associated with a lesser incidence of tourniquet pain than the axillary approach? The following nerves contribute to the perception of tourniquet pain: musculocutaneous, radial, medial cutaneous brachial (MCBN) and intercostobrachial (ICBN). The potential advantage of the ICB over the axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB) in regards to tourniquet pain comes from anatomical reasons. In the pyramid shaped infraclavicular space the cords are much closer to each other; thus the likelihood of achieving effective MCBN and ICBN block is greater. The infraclavicular route has proven to result in an equally effective, reliable and safe block of the brachial plexus, compared to the axillary approach. We hypothesize that the incidence of tourniquet pain is less with infraclavicular block compared to axillary brachial plexus block.

The aim of the study is, to compare the incidence and severity of tourniquet pain associated with ultrasound guided ICB and ABPB in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery at the level or distal to the elbow, with a tourniquet time longer than 45 minutes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Co. Cork
      • Cork, Co. Cork, Ireland
        • Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cork University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I-III
  • Orthopedic surgery at the level or distal to the elbow
  • Expected tourniquet time > 45 min (K-wiring not suitable)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication of regional anaesthesia, patient is allergic to local anesthetics
  • Clinically significant cognitive impairment (Minimental state score < 24)
  • Chronic pain syndrome
  • Preexisting nerve damage in the operated arm (sensory or motor deficit)
  • Axillary clearance in the past
  • History of peripheral neuropathy)
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Infraclavicular Block
The patient will be positioned supine. The operating limb may be positioned abducted or adducted by side depending on operator preference and patient factors. After standard preparation, the needle will be directed towards the target area using an in-plane, short-axis technique. Local anaesthetic (lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200.000) will be injected posterior to the artery with the intention achieving the U shape, cranio-postero-caudal spread. Local anaesthetic will be deposited to the lateral and medial cords as well, if required. The total dose of the local anaesthetic will be 20-30 ml, as clinically indicated.
Ultrasound guided peripheral nerve block
Experimental: Axillary Brachial Plexus Block
The patient will be positioned supine with the operative upper limb extended, flexed at the elbow, rested on a pillow to expose the axilla. After standard preparation, the needle will be directed towards the target area using an in-plane, short-axis technique. All four nerves in the axillary region are being blocked. The local anesthetic (lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200.000, 15-25 ml) will be divided among the four nerves as clinically indicated by the spread, but at least 3 ml applied to each nerve.
Ultrasound guided peripheral nerve block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of tourniquet pain
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
Intraoperative period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Onset time of tourniquet pain
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
Intraoperative period
Severity of tourniquet pain
Time Frame: Intraoperative period

Mild tourniquet pain (no need for intervention*) Moderate tourniquet pain (need for fentanyl / additional sedation*) Severe tourniquet pain (requiring GA*)

*: based on the clinical judgement of the responsible clinician (not a member of the study team)

Intraoperative period
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: During block placement
Vascular puncture or paresthesia during block placement
During block placement
Block performance time
Time Frame: During block placement
From commencing sterile preparation to completion of injection of local anaesthetic
During block placement
Block onset time
Time Frame: 30 minutes after block placement
From completed injection of local anaesthetic until loss of cold sensation in distribution of radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous nerve in the hand and forearm
30 minutes after block placement
Incidence of block failure
Time Frame: 30 minutes after block placement
Presence of cold sensation in at least one distribute of radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous nerves in the hand and forearm at 30 min after completion of injection of local anaesthetic
30 minutes after block placement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: George Shorten, Professor, Professor of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Consultant Anaesthetist, University College Cork / Cork University Hospital
  • Study Director: Gabriella Iohom, Dr., Consultant Anaesthetist, Senior Lecturer, Cork University Hospital / University College Cork

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TP-ICB-ABPB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tourniquet Pain

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound guided peripheral nerve block

3
Subscribe