Classification of Patient Therapeutic Education Programs Components : Etude CONCErTo (CONCErTo)

May 29, 2019 updated by: Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Development of a Classification of the Components of Patient Therapeutic Education Interventions That Can Impact Their Results and Can Ensure Their Continued Existence CONCErTo Study

Interest in patient therapeutic education (PTE) is increasing: in France PTE was included within the 2009 "Hospital, Patient, Health and Territory" law as an essential component of the patient healthcare pathway.

PTE is a complex intervention: its delivery is variable and may vary according to its content, functioning, providers, targeted patients, environment and even its objectives. These differences impact the expected results and make difficult the evaluation of PTE interventions. To overcome this difficulty, it is essential to describe precisely the intervention, the processes and the implementation of PTE that are usually not known. PTE interventions need today a global understanding of their mechanisms constituting their complexity.

CONCErTo study aims at developing a classification of the different elements composing a PTE intervention that can impact their results and can ensure their continued existence.

Mechanisms implemented during PTE interventions will be analyzed by a qualitative research. The investigators wish to identify organizational, pedagogical, psychosocial, medical or contextual elements that can impact the results, the patients' participation and the continuity of the program.

The perspective of this research is to improve the understanding of PTE by providing thorough description of the interventions. This work will help stakeholders to better interpret the results of their interventions, to improve the transferability, the implementation and finally to determine which are the elements able to improve patients' health status.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This research is an observational study with no intervention. It uses qualitative methods.

The development of the classification consists in 3 phases: a preliminary phase of literature review, an investigation phase and a phase of elaboration of the classification.

Preliminary phase To deepen the questioning of the research, a literature review will be realized on concepts and models as well as on tools and methods used in the published PTE interventions.

Investigation phase

This step uses qualitative methods with 3 types of data collection:

  • Semi structured interviews: individual interview will be realized with health care professionals and Therapeutic Patient Education stakeholders (trainers, professional network, decisions makers..). Focus groups will be organized with patients after completion of a therapeutic patient education program.
  • In situ observations of the sessions
  • Analysis of the documents surrounding the implementation of the interventions: reports, grey literature, applications; the objective is to capture the environment supervising the programs

The investigators plan to include up to 15 programs. However, this number will be adjusted according to the principle of data saturation.

Programs will be selected to ensure variability: the investigators will include hospital based or community based programs, programs led by general practitioners or specialists, with or without patients' implication, recent or experimented programs.

For each program, at least 3 health care professionals and one focus group with patients will be conducted. It will be completed by observation of education sessions.

Other actors (patients' proxies, associations playing a role in the conception or animation of the programs, designers, coordinators, general practitioners, experts of French territorial organization, trainers..;) will complete the data.

The aim of this step is not only to describe the practices but also to interview the experts on the elements they think can impact the results of PTE interventions.

Phase of elaboration of the classification Thematic and content data analyses are scheduled. Concept mapping method will be used to develop the classification.

The classification will be reviewed by experts having not participated to the previous steps.

Validation of the classification :

Applicability and relevance of the classification will be tested with 15 programs in various medical domains.

The classification will then be used in a cohort of patients before and after PTE intervention.

With this classification (or list), recommendations to describe PTE programs will be published.

Eventually, the aim of the recommendations, is to improve the understanding of PTE by providing thorough description of the interventions. This work will help stakeholders to better interpret the results of their interventions, to improve the transferability, the implementation and finally to determine which are the elements able to improve patients' health status.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nancy, France, 54000
        • Recruiting
        • RAT Anne-Christine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients following a patient education program health care professionals

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients following a patient education program
  • professionals involved in a patients education program

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported elements of patient therapeutic education
Time Frame: 2 years
Focus groups of patients
2 years
Heath care professionals-reported elements of patient therapeutic education
Time Frame: 2 years
Individual Interviews of health care professionals
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne-Christine Rat, Nancy Hospital, CIC-EC Inserm CIC 1433; EA 4360 APEMAC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PREPS1439089

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Disease

Clinical Trials on interviews

Subscribe