Local Analgesia Versus Local Peroperative Infiltration After Total Hip Replacement (ALRIAL)

August 8, 2017 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Clinical study, comparative, prospective, interventional, randomized, single-center, single-blind The fast resumption of the walking after surgery of total prosthesis of hip (PTH) requires an effective analgesia from the immediate post-operative period. In France, whatever is the peroperative anesthesia, the analgesic reference technique is a locoregional anesthesia (ALR) ultrasound guidance by blocks of the femoral and cutaneous nerves side of the thigh. In the Anglo-Saxon countries, in particular in Australia and in the United States, the techniques of peroperative infiltration of local anesthetics (IAL) by the surgeon supplanted the techniques of traditional ALR. However, no French study compares the IAL with the conventional ALR with a rigorous methodology. Our occasional practice of IAL suggests us that it is more effective in terms of post-operative analgesia with Analog Visual Scales decreased (EVA) and a lesser consumption of morphine. Furthermore, the resumption of the upright posture in bipedal support as well as the resumption of the walking would be earlier.

The main objective is to show that the post-operative analgesia by local peroperative infiltration is superior to that obtained by locoregional anesthesia (ALR by femoral block associated with a side cutaneous block of the thigh) after the surgery of total prosthesis of hip, with decrease of the consumption of morphine within first 72 post-operative hours.

The secondary objectives are to compare the Analog Visual Scales of pain (EVA) with the rest and with the mobilization during various times (in post-surgery care room, then at H4, H8, H12, H24, H48, H72), the period between the end of intervention (out of the operating room) and the first support by the upright posture in bipedal support), the period between the end of intervention and the resumption of the walk, the satisfaction of the patients at the exit of the hospital, the duration of hospitalization after the surgical operation and the possible unwanted events (systematic toxicity of the local anesthetics, the infection of prosthesis, disease thromboembolic venous) during the hospitalization.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • LYON cedex 03, France, 69437
        • Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Département d'anesthésie réanimation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men or women > or = 18 years old
  • Surgery for total hip replacement (THR)
  • Unilateral THR
  • First THR
  • THR planned because of a degenerative disease or after a traumatism
  • Whatever the technique of anesthesia (general anesthesia or intra thecal anesthesia)
  • Whatever the surgery technique/surgical approach
  • Patient with a social security protection
  • Patient not under juridic protection
  • Agreement for the study signed by the patient himself or, if he is not able to sign, by his trusted person.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient Refusal
  • Second hip replacement
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Porphyria
  • Risks to have methemoglobinemia (G6PD deficit, hemoglobin disease)
  • BMI> 40 kg/m2 ou < 18 kg/m2
  • Allergy to any of the drugs used in this study
  • Contraindication to any of the technic used in this study
  • Factors wich could influence the perception of pain (depression, dementia, psychiatric illness, neurologic disease with sensitivity troubles)
  • Usual consumption of opioids
  • Systemic or articular infection
  • Participation to an other research that could interfere in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Locoregional anesthesia
Classical locoregional analgesia by ultrasound guidance by blocks of the femoral and cutaneous nerves side of the thigh will be performed in patients of this arm
classical analgesia by ultrasound guidance by blocks of the femoral and cutaneous nerves side of the thigh
Experimental: Peroperative infiltration
Peroperative infiltration of local anesthetics (IAL) will be performed in patients of this arm
peroperative infiltration of local anesthetics

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantity of morphine consumed
Time Frame: 72 hours after surgery
Morphine consumption will be measured within the 72 hours following surgery
72 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain at rest
Time Frame: 72 hours after surgery
Visual analogic pain scale (EVA) will be used to evaluate patient's pain at rest within the 72 hours following surgery
72 hours after surgery
Pain while moving
Time Frame: 72 hours after surgery
Visual analogic pain scale (EVA) will be used to evaluate patient's pain while moving within the 72 hours following surgery
72 hours after surgery
Time between intervention and first support by the upright posture in bipedal station.
Time Frame: From date of surgery until the date of first documented resumption of walk, assessed up to 20 days after surgery
Period between the end of intervention (out of the operating room) and the first support by the upright posture in bipedal station.
From date of surgery until the date of first documented resumption of walk, assessed up to 20 days after surgery
Time between intervention and resumption of the walk
Time Frame: From date of surgery until the date of first documented resumption of walk, assessed up to 20 days after surgery
From date of surgery until the date of first documented resumption of walk, assessed up to 20 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 14, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Hip Replacement

Clinical Trials on Locoregional anesthesia

Subscribe