Evaluation of X-ray, Acetabular Guides and CT in THR (EXACT)

Total hip replacement is one of the most successful surgical procedures of modern times, with over 80,000 performed each year in the UK. However, up to 5% of all primary hip replacements need to be revised within the first 10 years, and in many cases malposition of the acetabular (hip socket) component is implicated in the early failure.

The standard method of positioning the acetabular component is for the surgeon to be guided by a combination of the visible anatomical landmarks within the surgical field, and the wider environment of the operating theatre. The advent of 3D printing has led to the development of custom-made surgical guides which can be used during surgery, in order to assist the surgeon in the positioning of instruments and devices. These surgical guides are manufactured based on CT or MRI imaging, and are designed to clearly indicate to the surgeon the desired location and orientation of bony cuts and implant positions.

This study will test the hypothesis that an acetabular alignment guide combined with three-dimensional CT-based planning using the Corin OPS™ (Optimised Positioning System), provides more accurate component alignment following primary total hip replacement compared with the current standard treatment, with the aim of improving patient outcomes and reducing the risk of complications of total hip replacement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Total hip replacement is one of the most successful surgical procedures of modern times, with over 80,000 performed each year in the UK. The vast majority of patients experience dramatic pain relief and improvement in function for many years. Despite this, however, there remains a significant risk of complications, including dislocation, leg length discrepancy, squeaking, and premature wear and failure of the implant. It is known that such complications are more likely to occur if the acetabular component is incorrectly positioned during the surgery. Up to 5% of all primary hip replacements need to be revised within the first 10 years, and in many cases malposition of the acetabular (hip socket) component is implicated in the early failure.

The Corin OPS™ offers such a custom-made acetabular alignment guide. Prior to the patient's surgery, a CT scan of the patient's pelvis & legs is performed, and the images are used to produce a 3D computer model of the patient as they stand with a "virtual" hip replacement in place. Four additional X-rays of the pelvis and lumbar spine are also taken, with the patient adopting various predetermined "functional" positions (e.g. sitting in a chair, about to stand up). From these X-rays, the changes in the pelvic and femoral orientations can be measured for these functional positions. This data is then used to drive a simulation of the movement of the 3D computer model. The orientation of the components of the virtual hip replacement are then adjusted to optimise the biomechanical function of the joint. Once the proposed implant positions have been reviewed and approved by the surgeon, a custom-made acetabular orientation guide is 3-D printed and sterilised. During the surgery, this guide is fitted into the patient's acetabulum prior to implanting the components. Using a simple system of two sterile laser pointers, the orientation indicated by the guide can then be reproduced when the definitive acetabular component is implanted. There is no published data, however, on the accuracy of acetabular component positioning using this particular method. The standard of care in the UK for acetabular component positioning is the "freehand technique", where the surgeon is to be guided by a combination of the visible anatomical landmarks within the surgical field, and the wider environment of the operating theatre. It is important that the impact of this acetabular guide on acetabular component positioning be assessed in order to determine whether this intervention is likely to improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of complications of total hip replacement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Midlands
      • Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom, CV2 2DX
        • University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing an elective primary unilateral total hip replacement (THR) under the care of an orthopaedic consultant at University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
  • Provision of written informed consent.
  • Male or Female aged 18-70 years.
  • Able and willing to comply with all study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those patients deemed by the treating clinician as unsuitable for an uncemented primary acetabular implant for reasons such as

    1. Low demand patient
    2. Osteoporosis
    3. Significant acetabular bone loss
  • Patients with significant orthopaedic deformities (eg fused knee, hip or ankle).
  • Unable to undergo planning imaging (unable to stand or sit for X-rays, or to lie in a CT scanner).
  • Patients currently receiving ionising radiation treatment or scans for other medical conditions.
  • Previous entry in this trial (contralateral THR).
  • Participation in a clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product in the last 90 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard group
2D X-ray templating technology
Standard care where hip replacement is planned using 2D X-ray templating software
Other Names:
  • Standard Care
Experimental: Corin OPS™
Corin Optimised Positioning System (OPS) Dynamic Hip Analysis
The OPS Dynamic Hip Analysis is a computer software package used to generate simulations of a total joint replacement from patient imaging. The dynamic simulation is used for operative planning, including implant selection, sizing and placement; and to create custom instruments or delivery specifications referencing the patient's anatomy and bio-mechanics. The simulation can also be used for the post-operative evaluation of joint performance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acetabular Cup Anteversion Angle
Time Frame: 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) post-surgery
The difference between planned and achieved acetabular cup anteversion assessed by post-operative CT scan
6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hip Disability & Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
Time Frame: 6-weeks, 4- and 12-months post-surgery
Hip Disability & Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS): a validated, patient-reported measure of hip function.
6-weeks, 4- and 12-months post-surgery
Oxford Hip Score
Time Frame: 6-weeks, 4- and 12-months post-surgery
Oxford Hip Score: a validated, patient-reported measure of hip function
6-weeks, 4- and 12-months post-surgery
EQ-5D
Time Frame: 6-weeks, 4- and 12-months post-surgery
EQ-5D: a standardised measure of health and economic outcome.
6-weeks, 4- and 12-months post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard King, MBChB, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be made available to other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Hip Replacement

Clinical Trials on 2D X-ray templating technology

Subscribe