Cost-effectiveness Study of the New Nutrition Screening Tool CIPA at Hospital Admission

November 11, 2018 updated by: José Pablo Suárez Llanos, University Hospital of the Nuestra Señora de Candelaria

Cost-effectiveness Study of the CIPA Screening Method for Patients With Nutritional Risk at Hospital Admission

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implementing a malnutrition screening tool "CIPA" at the Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria (HUNSC), comparing the impact on health and the healthcare costs of hospitalised patients who are screened for malnutrition and of patients following standard clinical practice. Methodology: The study will consist of a controlled trial on patients admitted to the Internal Medicine and General and Digestive Surgery wards at the HUNSC. In both wards patients will be assigned to a control or to an intervention group. The control group will follow usual hospital clinical care, while the intervention group will be administered the screening tool "CIPA" for early detection of malnutrition cases and they will be treated according to the screening results. The following variables will be evaluated: length of stay in hospital, mortality, readmissions and in-hospital complications. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be undertaken measuring effectiveness by Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Cost per patient will be measured by identifying health care resource utilisation, and the cost-effectiveness measure will be the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). Investigators will calculate the incremental cost per QALY gained related to the intervention. This analysis will allow to quantify the costs (incurred and saved) related to the introduction of the malnutrition screening tool CIPA in the hospital context and to measure the health impact of screened patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

823

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 38010
        • Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Formal consent to participate in the study.
  • Patients admitted to the Internal Medicine or General Surgery wards.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated with nutritional support before CIPA screening is performed.
  • Patients transferred from other wards.
  • Patients with an expected length of stay less than 72 hours.
  • CIPA screening unfeasible for any reason.
  • Patients with poor short-term prognosis.
  • Bed destination at hospital admission nonrandomized.
  • Patients participating in other investigation study.
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CIPA screening tool
Patients are evaluated by CIPA nutritional screening tool
The new nutritional screening tool termed CIPA includes Control of food Intake, Protein, and Anthropometry (CIPA) results positive when at least one of the following parameters is met: control of food intake for 72 h <50%, serum albumin <3 g/dl, body mass index <18.5 kg/m2 or mid-upper arm circumference ≤ 22.5 cm.
No Intervention: usual hospital clinical care
Patients are not subject of CIPA screening tool, and continue the usual hospital clinical care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness measured by incremental Cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
Time Frame: up to 3 months after Hospital discharge time
up to 3 months after Hospital discharge time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
incidence of mortality
Time Frame: up to 3 months after Hospital discharge time
up to 3 months after Hospital discharge time
Quality of life measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)
Time Frame: up to 3 months after Hospital discharge time
up to 3 months after Hospital discharge time
mean length of stay (days)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 13 days
through study completion, an average of 13 days
incidence of readmissions
Time Frame: up to 3 months after hospital discharge time
up to 3 months after hospital discharge time

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on CIPA nutritional screening tool

Subscribe