Short Term Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of an Occluding Dentifrice in Providing Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity

A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of an Occluding Dentifrice in Providing Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity

This single centre, comparative design study will be used to investigate the efficacy of an experimental stannous fluoride containing dentifrice in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) after short term use compared with a standard fluoride dentifrice

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Dentin Sensitivity
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: stannous fluoride; Other: sodium monofluorophosphate

Detailed Description

This will be a single centre, three day, randomised, examiner blind, two treatment arm, parallel design, stratified (by maximum baseline Schiff sensitivity score of the two selected test teeth), controlled study, in participants with at least two sensitive teeth that meet all the criteria at the screening and baseline (pre-treatment) visits. Dentinal hypersensitivity will be assessed at baseline (pre-treatment), post-treatment and after 3 days twice daily brushing

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 229
• Phase: Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Canada
  • Ontario
    • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L4W 0C2
      • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Demonstrates understanding of the study procedures, restrictions and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form
• Aged 18-65 years inclusive
• Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions
• Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee: a) No clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history or oral examination. b) Absence of any condition that would impact on the participant's safety or wellbeing or affect the individual's ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements
• Self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) lasting more than six months but not more than 10 years
• Minimum of 20 natural teeth
• Minimum of 2 accessible non-adjacent teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), preferably in different quadrants, that meet all of the following criteria: Signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion (EAR), Tooth with MGI score =0 adjacent to the test area (exposed dentine) only [Lobene, 1986] and a clinical mobility of ≤1, Tooth with signs of sensitivity measured by qualifying evaporative air assessment (Y/N response)
• Minimum of two, non-adjacent accessible teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), that meet all of the following criteria: Tooth with signs of sensitivity, measured by qualifying tactile stimulus (Yeaple ≤ 20g) and evaporative air assessment (Schiff sensitivity score ≥ 2)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Women who are known to be pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study
• Women who are breast-feeding
• Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients
• Participation in another clinical study (including cosmetic studies) or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit.
• Previous participation in this study
• Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse
• An employee of the sponsor or the study site or members of their immediate family
• Presence of chronic debilitating disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect study outcomes or Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, causes xerostomia
• Dental prophylaxis within 4 weeks of Screening or Tongue or lip piercing or presence of dental implants
• Gross periodontal disease, treatment of periodontal disease (including surgery) within 12 months of Screening, scaling or root planning within 3 months of Screening and teeth bleaching within 8 weeks of Screening
• Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay within 12 months of Screening
• Tooth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentine
• Sensitive tooth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter dentifrice in the opinion of the investigator
• Use of an oral care product indicated for the relief of dentine hypersensitivity within 8 weeks of screening (participants will be required to bring their current oral care products to the site in order to verify the absence of known anti-sensitivity ingredients)
• Daily doses of medication/treatments which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the perception of pain. Examples of such medications include analgesics, anticonvulsants, antihistamines that cause marked or moderate sedation, sedatives, tranquilisers, anti-depressants, mood-altering and anti-inflammatory drugs
• Currently taking antibiotics or has taken antibiotics within 2 weeks of Baseline

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test dentifrice; Participants will be instructed to dose a dry toothbrush with a full strip (1 inch) of toothpaste. Participants will then brush each of the two selected sensitive test teeth first followed by the whole mouth thoroughly for at least 1 minute	Other: stannous fluoride; 0.454% weight by weight (w/w) stannous fluoride containing 1100ppm fluoride
Active Comparator: Control dentifrice; Participants will be instructed to dose a dry toothbrush with a full strip (1 inch) of toothpaste. Participants will then brush whole mouth thoroughly for at least 1 minute	Other: sodium monofluorophosphate; 0.76% w/w sodium monofluorophosphate containing 1000ppm fluoride

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Day 3	The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale which was scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: Participant responded to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responded to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, and requested discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score was indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.	Baseline to Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold on Day 3	The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gives two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.	Baseline to Day 3
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score Post First Treatment by Direct Application	The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale which was scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: Participant responded to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responded to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, and requested discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score was indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.	Baseline to 60 seconds post first treatment
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold Post First Treatment by Direct Application	The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gives two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.	Baseline to 60 seconds post first treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Creeth J, Gallob J, Sufi F, Qaqish J, Gomez-Pereira P, Budhawant C, Goyal C. Randomised clinical studies investigating immediate and short-term efficacy of an occluding toothpaste in providing dentine hypersensitivity relief. BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jun 4;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0781-x.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: April 1, 2016
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 1, 2016
• Study Completion (Actual): May 20, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 4, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 4, 2016
• First Posted (Estimate): April 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 17, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 19, 2017
• Last Verified: April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Immune System Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases; Tooth Diseases; Hypersensitivity; Dentin Sensitivity; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Protective Agents; Cariostatic Agents; Fluorides; Tin Fluorides; Fluorophosphate
• Other Study ID Numbers: 205710