Evaluation of Peer Specialists on VA PACTs (Peers on PACT)

July 19, 2023 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Program Evaluation of Peer Specialists on VA PACTS: A Quality Improvement Project (QUE 15-289)

In August 2014, the White House issued an Executive Action mandating that 25 VA medical centers place Peer Specialists (Veterans recovered from mental illness who are trained to support other Veterans with mental illness) on Primary Care Teams. Research shows that the success of adding new staff to existing teams can be improved by outside aid and facilitation. This quality improvement project will evaluate whether providing expanded support to half of the Primary Care Teams will lead to better outcomes when compared with teams that do not get extra support.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Peer Specialists are individuals with mental illness currently deployed to serve Veterans in specialty mental health clinics based upon their lived experiences. Peer Specialist delivered interventions have been shown to improve patient activation in multiple studies. In August 2014, the White House issued an Executive Action mandating that 25 VA medical centers pilot the deployment of Peer Specialists in their Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs). This project expands upon this nationally mandated Peer Specialist pilot with the integration of a cluster randomized implementation trial. This quality improvement project will evaluate the impact of facilitated implementation vs. standard implementation to support on the deployment of Peer Specialists in PACTs.

The 25 sites will be divided into three cohorts (n=8,8,9). Each cohort will begin over three successive six-month blocks beginning in early 2016. Within each cohort, sites will be randomized to receive either facilitated or standard implementation. Facilitated Implementation sites will receive one year of support based on the i-PARIHS implementation model which includes training, implementation planning, ongoing external facilitation, feedback and consultation. Standard Implementation sites will receive written guidance and limited consultation by the investigators' team. The investigators will compare the groups on 1) the percent of their target population that actually received PS services; 2) ratings on PS workload productivity including ; 3) Peer Implementation and Services scores; 4) assessment of Veteran's change over time on the outcome variables of satisfaction, activation, and functioning ; 5) qualitative analysis of how well PSs were deployed and their impact.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5616

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85723
        • Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson, AZ
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1290
        • VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33410
        • West Palm Beach VA Medical Center, West Palm Beach, FL
    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
        • Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL
      • Hines, Illinois, United States, 60141-5000
        • Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
    • Indiana
      • Marion, Indiana, United States, 46953
        • VA Northern Indiana Health Care System Marion Campus, Marion, IN
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40502
        • Lexington VA Medical Center, Lexington, KY
    • Maine
      • Togus, Maine, United States, 04330
        • Maine VA Medical Center, Augusta, ME
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
    • Massachusetts
      • Bedford, Massachusetts, United States, 01730
        • Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63106
        • St. Louis VA Medical Center John Cochran Division, St. Louis, MO
    • New York
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
        • Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY
    • North Carolina
      • Salisbury, North Carolina, United States, 28144
        • Salisbury W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC
    • Ohio
      • Chillicothe, Ohio, United States, 45601
        • Chillicothe VA Medical Center, Chillicothe, OH
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45220
        • Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43203-1278
        • Chalmers P. Wylie Ambulatory Care Center, Columbus, OH
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15240
        • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29209
        • Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC
    • Vermont
      • White River Junction, Vermont, United States, 05009-0001
        • White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Included sites must be VA PACT Primary Care Health teams with existing Peer Specialists who are able to include an existing Peer Specialist on their team for a minimum of 10 hours per week for one year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non VA PACT teams, VA sites without an existing Peer Specialists, and VA PACT primary care teams that cannot commit a Peer Specialist to Primary Care for a minimum of 10 hours per week are excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard Implementation
Standard Implementation sites will receive written guidance and limited consultation by the investigators' team.
Experimental: Facilitated Implementation
Facilitated Implementation sites will receive one year of support based on the i-PARIHS implementation model which includes training, implementation planning, ongoing external facilitation, feedback and consultation.
Facilitated Implementation sites will receive one year of support based on the i-PARIHS implementation model which includes training, implementation planning, ongoing external facilitation, feedback and consultation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Activation Measure Change
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year
The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is a 13-item survey that measures an individual's perceived ability to manage his or her illness and health behaviors and act as an effective patient. It has been shown to be reliable, valid, sensitive to change and correlates with measures of improved self-management. Scores for this outcome range from Zero to One Hundred with higher scores indicating higher levels of patient activation (better outcome).
Baseline, 6 months, 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Team Development Measure
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year
The Team Development Measure is a 31 item self-report survey that evaluates the degree to which a team has and uses the components needed for highly effective teamwork including cohesiveness, communication, role clarity, and goals and means clarity. All components min scores are zero % and maximum is 100%; higher percentages mean positive responses.
Baseline, 6 months, 1 year
Peer Fidelity Measure
Time Frame: 6 months, 1 year
The Peer Fidelity Measure assesses: a) peer specialist services and b) peer specialist implementation. The first part has 5 domains of peer services critical to the VA's peer support model (e.g., being a role model that recovery is possible; share personal recovery story). The second has 7 domains of implementation factors shown to either help or hinder PS deployment (e.g., role clarity, support for PS at higher organizational levels, regular supervision). Each domain has 1-2 questions (responses ranging from 1= not at all through 5=Very much with higher scores indicating higher fidelity. Min Value=1 and Max value =5. The Peer Fidelity Measure will be administered to both Peer Specialists and their supervisors. Analyses looked at discrepancies (difference in difference) between Peer Specialists and their Supervisors at each time point. Min discrepancy score is -4 and Max discrepancy score is 4. (calculated as Peer Specialist minus Peer Supervisor score)
6 months, 1 year
The Satisfaction Index-Mental Health
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year
The Satisfaction Index-Mental Health is a 12-item, unidimensional measure of patient satisfaction with care. It has been used with Veteran populations and has been shown to be valid, reliable, and sensitive to change in a sample of Veterans with mental illnesses being treated in primary care settings. It will be administered to Veterans who receive care from the Peer Specialists involved in the project. Minimum score is 12 and the maximum score is 72; higher scores mean more satisfaction.
Baseline, 6 months, 1 year
Number of Unique Veterans Seen (Adjusted for Employment Period and Hours Worked Per Week)
Time Frame: one year, across two years
This adjusted workload variables took into consideration both the employment period (many PSs did not start immediately or may have left prior to the end of the 2 years) and weekly hours worked (varying from one hour to 40 hours per week). Visits during each PS's employment period were divided by the total number of hours worked, then multiplied by 40 to calculate adjusted values for operationalization above. Because this variable was significantly skewed, we used a log transformation to improve their distributional properties. Differences between intervention conditions were then compared with a series of Analyses of Covariance models with age, gender and race as covariates. Since these variables are measured at the PS level, the covariates were the average across the Veterans sesn by each PS (mean age, percent White and percent male). N's are number of Veterans
one year, across two years
Average Number of Visits Per Veteran Per Peer Specialist-Adjusted (Across Both Years)
Time Frame: across both years

See Variable 5 above for details about adjustment. Since this variable this is a Veteran level variable, a General Linear Mixed Model (GSLMM) was used with PS specified as a random effect and Veteran age, race and gender.

N's are number of Veterans

across both years
Average Total Number of Services Provided-Adjusted (First Year Only and Across Both Years)
Time Frame: one year and across both years
This adjusted workload variables took into consideration both the employment period (many PSs did not start immediately or may have left prior to the end of the 2 years) and weekly hours worked (varying from one hour to 40 hours per week). Visits during each PS's employment period were divided by the total number of hours worked, then multiplied by 40 to calculate adjusted values for operationalization above. Because this variable was significantly skewed, we used a log transformation to improve their distributional properties. Differences between intervention conditions were then compared with a series of Analyses of Covariance models with age, gender and race as covariates. Since these variables are measured at the PS level, the covariates were the average across the Veterans sesn by each PS (mean age, percent White and percent male). N's are number of Veterans
one year and across both years
Time to First Service
Time Frame: variable from baseline to time of first service delivered by Peer Specialists
This variable represents count of days from time study at each site started (baseline) until first service was delivered.
variable from baseline to time of first service delivered by Peer Specialists
Average Number of Visits Per Veteran Per Peer Specialist-Adjusted (First Year Only)
Time Frame: 1st year only

See Variable 5 above for details about adjustment. Since this variable this is a Veteran level variable, a General Linear Mixed Model (GSLMM) was used with PS specified as a random effect and Veteran age, race and gender.

N's are number of Veterans

1st year only

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew J. Chinman, PhD, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Principal Investigator: Richard W Goldberg, PhD, Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

April 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • QUX 16-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Illness

Clinical Trials on Facilitated Implementation

Subscribe