Patient Centered Quality Reporting

April 8, 2016 updated by: Dana Mukamel, University of California, Irvine
The purpose of this study is to develop a consumer friendly web-based interface between Nursing Home Compare (NHC) and an e-coaching/decision-aid tool (NHCPlus) and determine if use of NHCPlus facilitates and enhances access to and use of NHC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

225

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92697
        • University of California

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have been admitted as an inpatient into the departments of Medicine or Surgery at the UC Irvine Medical Center, and whose discharge plan is to a nursing home.
  • Family members of these patients, if they are involved in the choice of nursing home, were also recruited to the study, either as joint decision makers with the patients or as proxy decision makers for the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than 50 years of age.
  • Patients unable to use NHCPlus technology or participate in the nursing home choice decision (i.e. non-English speaking, severely visual or hearing impaired, dementia, or other debilitating illnesses) will be excluded unless they have a representative/proxy who will be involved in the decision to select the nursing home.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Intervention patients will receive access to NHCPlus when discharge to a nursing home from the hospital is expected.
A decision-aid tool that will interface with Nursing Home Compare and improve consumers' ability to assimilate and incorporate the information into their process of choosing a nursing home.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Control patients will receive the usual care when discharge to a nursing home from the hospital is expected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use of Nursing Home Compare information
Time Frame: up to 9 days post discharge
Patients (or their families) self report their knowledge and use of the information in Nursing Home Compare.
up to 9 days post discharge
Quality Measures of chosen nursing home
Time Frame: up to 9 days post-discharge
Quality measures obtained from the Nursing Home Compare web based report card
up to 9 days post-discharge
Distance between patient/family residence and the chosen nursing home.
Time Frame: up to 9 days post-discharge
Driving distance between the patient zip code and the chosen nursing home zip code using Google maps.
up to 9 days post-discharge
Length of stay in hospital
Time Frame: between 1 and 68 days
Number of days between admission date and discharge date
between 1 and 68 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dana Mukamel, PhD, University of California

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HS# 2012-9098

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality Report Cards

Subscribe