Usability Evaluation - Reassure Respiration Rate Device: Home User Study

April 14, 2021 updated by: ResMed

Reassure Respiration Rate Device: Home User Study

This is a usability evaluation of the Reassure device. The device is a non-contact device which passively monitors breathing.

The purpose of this usability evaluation is to understand any issues that the intended user population have while using the device unsupervised in the home and to determine if the device can collect data that is of sufficient quality to be successfully analysed for respiration rate.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The aim of the set of Reassure Home User Trials is to understand any usability issues that users have while using the Reassure non contact monitor in their home environment.

Other objectives:

  • To gather useful feedback on the user interface and suggestions for its improvement.
  • To gather information on the device stability in the more variable conditions of the home user environment.
  • To gather data in order to demonstrate compliance with IEC62366, and thus IEC60601-1

The users had the device for a minimum of 10 nights, to confirm if the device could be used for an extended period and the likely compliance rates of users

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Up to 60 volunteers, all naïve to the device. The majority of the volunteers to be >65 years old, to represent the likely user profile: person with a set of chronic diseases, and not necessarily technically adept

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • volunteer, no previous exposure to the device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • restless leg syndrome or other conditions giving to uncontrolled movements whilst asleep

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
HUT1
First phase of the home user trial. 19 users, 12 who were part of a couple and 7 who were single.
HUT2

Second phase of home user trial, testing improvements to the device user interface as a result of the experience from HUT1. Total 11 users.

Main change to device was a simpler set of displays and button-sequence on a 24 hour period.

HUT3

Third phase of home user trial, testing the final improvements to the device. A total of 18 users, 16 of which who were part of a couple and 2 who were single.

Main change was the introduction of a scheduled recording option, making the device totally automatic in routine use.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Nights' Data That Were Successfully Recorded
Time Frame: At least 10 nights

The definitions utilised to determine the patient's success or otherwise at making a recording of their sleep respiration data are:

• That 67% of the duration of the recording has to be of sufficient quality for the respiration rate algorithms to be able to discern a respiration rate.

AND

• The duration of analysable data is to be at least 2 hours.

At least 10 nights

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Recordings With Successful First Time Transmission
Time Frame: For at least 10 nights of recordings
Percentage of the recordings that were successfully transmitted from the home location to the central database on the day of the recording
For at least 10 nights of recordings

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Phillips, MA, MSc, ResMed Sensor Technologies Ltd

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • D22105-115

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Trial to validate the user features of the new medical device. Trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov only because it involves human volunteers. No plans to publish

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ease of Use

Subscribe