- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02740517
Usability Evaluation - Reassure Respiration Rate Device: Home User Study
Reassure Respiration Rate Device: Home User Study
This is a usability evaluation of the Reassure device. The device is a non-contact device which passively monitors breathing.
The purpose of this usability evaluation is to understand any issues that the intended user population have while using the device unsupervised in the home and to determine if the device can collect data that is of sufficient quality to be successfully analysed for respiration rate.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The aim of the set of Reassure Home User Trials is to understand any usability issues that users have while using the Reassure non contact monitor in their home environment.
Other objectives:
- To gather useful feedback on the user interface and suggestions for its improvement.
- To gather information on the device stability in the more variable conditions of the home user environment.
- To gather data in order to demonstrate compliance with IEC62366, and thus IEC60601-1
The users had the device for a minimum of 10 nights, to confirm if the device could be used for an extended period and the likely compliance rates of users
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- volunteer, no previous exposure to the device
Exclusion Criteria:
- restless leg syndrome or other conditions giving to uncontrolled movements whilst asleep
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
HUT1
First phase of the home user trial.
19 users, 12 who were part of a couple and 7 who were single.
|
|
HUT2
Second phase of home user trial, testing improvements to the device user interface as a result of the experience from HUT1. Total 11 users. Main change to device was a simpler set of displays and button-sequence on a 24 hour period. |
|
HUT3
Third phase of home user trial, testing the final improvements to the device. A total of 18 users, 16 of which who were part of a couple and 2 who were single. Main change was the introduction of a scheduled recording option, making the device totally automatic in routine use. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Nights' Data That Were Successfully Recorded
Time Frame: At least 10 nights
|
The definitions utilised to determine the patient's success or otherwise at making a recording of their sleep respiration data are: • That 67% of the duration of the recording has to be of sufficient quality for the respiration rate algorithms to be able to discern a respiration rate. AND • The duration of analysable data is to be at least 2 hours. |
At least 10 nights
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Recordings With Successful First Time Transmission
Time Frame: For at least 10 nights of recordings
|
Percentage of the recordings that were successfully transmitted from the home location to the central database on the day of the recording
|
For at least 10 nights of recordings
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Paul Phillips, MA, MSc, ResMed Sensor Technologies Ltd
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- D22105-115
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ease of Use
-
Medical University of South CarolinaJohns Hopkins University; University of North Carolina; Cook Endoscopy; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg...CompletedQuantity of Tissue Obtained | Quality of Tissue Obtained | Ease of Use of 22-gauge ProCore EBUS Needles and the Standard 22-gauge NeedlesUnited States
-
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)CompletedEase Of Access To Covid VaccineUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedEfficacy of Bowel Preparation | Ease of Bowel Preparation and Patient TolerabilityCanada
-
The Whiteley ClinicVeinSenseRecruitingEase of Applying and Removing, and Comfort, of Compression StockingsUnited Kingdom
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedPracticality, Efficacy, and Ease of Lignocaine Nebulization Compared to Traditional Upper Airway Block for Awake Nasal Fiberoptic IntubationEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedAdverse Effect of Drugs and Medicaments in Therapeutic Use | Adverse Effects in the Therapeutic Use of AnaestheticsEgypt
-
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-ThionvilleCompletedGood Use of Antibiotics
-
VA Boston Healthcare SystemOregonCompletedUse of Sleep MedicationsUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedInappropriate Use of EchocardiographyUnited States
-
George Mason UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); University of MarylandCompletedSkill Development of Staff | Use of Standardized Assessment ToolsUnited States