Comparing the Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) Versus Counseling in the Treatment of Concussion

August 5, 2024 updated by: Sheldon Yao, New York Institute of Technology
Concussion or mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a challenging injury for physicians to manage and is among the most serious disabling neurological disorders. Physician awareness regarding manifestations of TBI and subsequent treatment are paramount to reduce the burden of disease. Advancements in treatment of mild TBI have been slow with a lack of consensus on treatment methods that show universal success. This gap in treatment choices provides an opportunity for osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to fill. OMT is a hands-on manual therapy that can be integrated to help treat post-concussive symptoms. Previous studies have shown that OMT can help resolve imbalance and tinnitus in elderly populations and case studies have shown that this manual therapy may assist in patient recovery. The investigators hypothesize that OMT will decrease return to play/work time, will show an improvement in balance, and will decrease concussion symptoms as compared to counseling.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose:

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in improving concussion-related symptoms.

Previous studies and case reports have found a positive effect of OMT on resolving concussion-like symptoms such as vertigo, imbalance, and tinnitus. It is hypothesized that OMT improves proprioceptive input from the cervical spine and joints and sensory input from the internal auditory meatus. The investigators propose to further investigate this relationship in order to quantify the effect of OMT through the SMART Balance Master and return to play/work time. As this is a pilot study, the investigators intend to determine if a correlation exists between OMT and return to work/play and SMART Balance Master scores.

Specifically, the investigators have three main aims for this study:

Specific Aim #1: OMT will show a statistically significant improvement balance as measured by the SMART Balance Master scores pre- and post-OMT

Specific Aim #2: OMT will decrease concussion symptom as measured by surveys

Specific Aim #3: OMT will decrease return to play/work time in concussed subjects compared to standard.

Background/Rationale:

Concussion or mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a challenging injury for physicians to manage. It is undetectable by traditional imaging techniques, and there are limited treatment options. A concussion results from a biomechanical force directed towards the head that precedes and contributes to neurologic dysfunction, including impairment in the level of consciousness. However, a loss of consciousness is not a requirement for the diagnosis.

The CDC estimates the annual burden of concussion in the United States to be roughly 1.4-3.8 million. Over the past decade, the CDC also reports a 70% increase in TBI emergency department visits, as well as an increase in TBI-related hospitalizations. Other studies have determined the prevalence of individuals with chronic concussion problems in the US is 5.3 million. Importantly, these figures should be considered an underestimate as patients with milder injuries often do not seek treatment.

The mechanism of concussion involves a primary and secondary phase of tissue injury. A primary injury is immediate and irreversible, resulting from acceleration/deceleration mechanical damage. Secondary injuries result from non-mechanical damage derived from neuronal cell membrane disruption and axonal stretch. The membrane defects result from secondary injury and lead to ionic influx and accumulation of toxic substances such as glutamate within the nervous system. Individuals with mild concussion recover within a few days; however, 15% of patients with mild concussion suffer from long-term complications largely due to the secondary phase of injury.

Recent literature has studied the role of restricted cerebral blood flow and inflammation on perpetuating the symptoms of a concussion. Meier et al. discovered an inverse relationship between cerebral blood flow in the dorsal midinsular cortex and the time to return to play. Other studies have investigated the role of inflammation, through the production of reactive oxygen species, that not only contribute to the initial injury but also potentiate its own pathological course. These studies highlight potential mechanisms that could be targeted to decrease symptoms and improve outcomes.

Treatment for mild concussion in the past has been limited to bed rest. Previous studies have noted that bed rest following a concussion does not improve recovery time and, if continued for too long, can negatively impact recovery. Some pilot projects have reported promising findings such as decreased 30-day mortality with progesterone. Through a meta-analysis of non-surgical interventions following a mild TBI, Nygren-de Boussard et al. found that there are poor randomized controlled trials or comparison groups to indicate any intervention can provide therapeutic benefit. Furthermore, evidence supports a more individualized approach when treating post-concussive symptoms.

Alternative or complementary treatments encompass a variety of individual approaches for different patients including herbal supplements, homeopathy, hyperbaric oxygen, arts and recreational therapies, meditation practice, and Tai Chi Chuan. Empirical literature on alternative treatments for mild concussion is sparse, with many studies either insufficiently powered or poorly controlled. The widespread use and popularity of these treatment options and their potential to help treat concussions demands further scientific investigation.

Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is defined in the Glossary of Osteopathic Terminology as "the therapeutic application of manually guided forces by an osteopathic physician to improve physiologic function and/or support homeostasis that has been altered by somatic dysfunction." Somatic dysfunctions, or restrictions of skeletal or myofascial structures, disrupt the normal function of vascular, lymphatic and neural components related to or that pass through these structures. By treating somatic dysfunctions, OMT aims to remove musculoskeletal (MSK) restrictions which allow for increased blood flow and lymphatic drainage and decreased nerve impingements. Somatic dysfunctions in the cranium and spine can contribute to patient's concussion symptoms including dizziness and tinnitus. Treatment of somatic dysfunctions with OMT, targeting structures involved with concussion-related symptoms, may be another treatment option that can be offered to these patients.

Evidence has supported the use of the SMART Balance Master as a validated tool to measure balance. Fraix et al. used the SMART Balance Master by NeuroCom® to quantify the beneficial effect of OMT on improving patients' balance and dizziness. The SMART Balance Master® can be used to quantify changes in balance before and after OMT. The Sensory Organization Test (SOT) is one assessment tool that can measure three different aspects of balance and posture: somatosensory, visual, and vestibular. The complete protocol for SOT can be found on the NeuroCom® website.

The ImPACT test is a widely used tool to help detect and assess the severity of concussion in athletes. This computerized test is administered to athletes routinely to establish a baseline of memory and cognitive function, and administered again in the suspicion of a concussion in order to evaluate the difference in cognitive function. The test is widely used and has been shown to be an effect adjunct test for evaluation of concussion as part of a comprehensive medical diagnosis involving other testing methods.

The SCAT-3 (sport concussion assessment tool - 3rd edition) is an improved version of a widely used aid for physicians for evaluating concussion severity and progress. The test is a combination of patient-reported symptom evaluation as well as an objective cognitive and physical exam.

The King-Devick Test objectively measures visual tracking and saccadic eye movements (rapid movement of the eye between fixation points). The test was originally developed in 1976 by eye care specialists to help evaluate reading disabilities as they related to oculomotor movement. Since 2011, the test has been used as a rapid sideline screening tool for concussion in a variety of sports, based on the findings that concussion is associated with many neuro-ophthalmologic signs. Many studies have shown the King-Devick Test to be a valid aid in detecting and evaluating concussions.

It is with these tools, the investigators aim to measure the effects of OMT on post-concussion symptoms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Old Westbury, New York, United States, 11568
        • Academic Helath Care Center - Sports Medicine Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is at least 18 years age
  • Subject has suffered from non-life threatening head trauma head trauma resulting in current concussion-related symptoms
  • Subject is evaluated and diagnosed with a concussion
  • Subject has been cleared to participate in the study by the physician/neurologist having excluded any potential emergent conditions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject has no absolute contraindications to osteopathic manipulative treatment, such as skull fracture, cervical fracture, signs of intracranial bleeding, cervical dissection, or stroke
  • The subject suffered from any of the following at the time of event leading to concussion:

    • Loss of consciousness >2 minutes in the field
    • Seizures
    • Intractable vomiting
    • Paralysis
  • The subject has been diagnosed with an underlying neurodegenerative condition that may confound test results (e.g.. Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease)
  • The subject has a current or previous spinal cord injury
  • The subject is unable to complete the assessment tools
  • The subject is pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
A board certified NMM/OMM or FP/OMM physician will perform an osteopathic structural exam and osteopathic treatment for a 30 minute session. The investigators will follow a generalized protocol for diagnosis and treatment of the head, neck, spine, rib cage, and pelvis. The following techniques will be included in the treatment protocol, OA (Occipitoatlantal) decompression, V-Spread, venous sinus drainage, balanced membranous tension (BMT), cranial lifts, CV4, and a mix of balanced ligamentous tension (BLT), muscle energy techniques, facilitated positional release, articulatory techniques (ART), high-velocity low-amplitude, and counterstrain to address any somatic dysfunctions.
Manual treatment of musculoskeletal restrictions that may be prevent proper healing post-concussion.
Other Names:
  • Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine
Active Comparator: Counseling
For the control group, an investigator will complete a 30-minute counseling session with the subject. The focus of discussion will be from the CDC's "What to expect after a concussion" article. Other resources that will also be used come from the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), FamilyDoctor.org, and the Brain Care Center. Each counseling session will follow the same protocol. The counseling session will provide subject with similar face-to-face time with the OMT arm.
Patients will be counseled on concussion awareness, symptoms, and treatment for 30 minutes by a physician.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SMART Balance Master balance scores pre and post intervention arm
Time Frame: change from the pre-intervention score after the intervention, measured at each visit through study completion, an average of 1 week after the initial visit
OMT should show a statistically significant improvement in balance as measured by SMART Balance Master balance scores as measured by change pre and post procedure
change from the pre-intervention score after the intervention, measured at each visit through study completion, an average of 1 week after the initial visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-concussion symptoms as measured by ImPACT
Time Frame: measured on day 1, day 3, and day 7 post concussion
OMT should decrease concussion symptoms as measured by subject responses on this performance test as measured by change pre and post procedure
measured on day 1, day 3, and day 7 post concussion
Post-concussion symptoms as measured by King-Devick
Time Frame: measured on day 1, day 3, and day 7 post concussion
OMT should decrease concussion symptoms as measured by subject responses on this performance test as measured by change pre and post procedure.
measured on day 1, day 3, and day 7 post concussion
Post-concussion symptoms as measured by SCAT-3
Time Frame: measured on day 1, day 3, and day 7 post concussion
OMT should decrease concussion symptoms as measured by subject responses on this survey as measured by change pre and post procedure.
measured on day 1, day 3, and day 7 post concussion

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Return to play time
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Players will be tracked for eventual clearance to return to play and OMT should decrease return to play time.
Up to 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sheldon Yao, DO, NYITCOM

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

April 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distorted; Balance

Clinical Trials on Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

Subscribe