Intra-rater Reliability and Agreement Between Two Dual Task Tests; WBB and Gait Test.

January 5, 2021 updated by: Martin Eriksen, Aalborg University Hospital

Intra-rater Reliability and Agreement Between Static Balance Test Using Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Gait Test Under Dual Task Conditions in Community-dwelling Older Adults.

Agreement and intra-rater reliability between static balance test using Nintendo Wii Balance Board and gait test under dual-task conditions in community-dwelling older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participants:

Investigators aim to recruit a minimum of 30 participants aged 65 years or above through convenience sampling at an senior activity centre in the Municipality of Aalborg. Participants inclusion critiria is age about 65, the ability to stand for 30 seconds unaided and the ability to walk 8 meters. Exclusion critiria is severe cognitive impairment (e.g., dementia).

Procedure:

Each participant will undergo two testdays separated by approximately two weeks. Both testdays have the same number and order of tests and are placed approximately the same time of the day. At the first testday descriptive information for each participant is collected.

Measuring device:

The Nintendo Wii Balance Board (Nintendo, Kyoto, Japan) is a small portable force plate measuring sway ellipse area and sway speed.

Analysis:

Will include intra-rater reliability for each test and agreement between the two. Calculations of balance/gait costs will be made to unify the unit and to compare the two tests to each other. Results shown by intraclass correlation coeffients and Bland Altman plots.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Aalborg
      • Vodskov, Aalborg, Denmark, 9310
        • Recruiting
        • Liselund Aktivitets Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Minimum 65 year-old community dwelling citizens at activity centers.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Minimum 65 years old.
  • Community dwelling

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to stand unsupported for 30 seconds
  • Unable to walk 8 meters unsupported

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intra-rater reliability for the gait test and the WBB test.
Time Frame: Through study completion, app. 8 months.
Comparing the dual task costs for each test between test and retest. Assessments through intraclass correlation coefficient and reportings in accordance with Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS).
Through study completion, app. 8 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement between the gait test and the WBB test as dual task measurements.
Time Frame: Through study completion, app. 8 months.
Comparing the dual task costs between the gait test and the Wii Balance Board test. Data assessment through Bland Altman plots and reportings in accordance with Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS).
Through study completion, app. 8 months.
Descriptive data.
Time Frame: Through study completion, app. 8 months.
Qustionnairies consisting of Tilburg Frailty Indicator, Vulnerable Elders Survey 13, Short Falls Efficacy Scale, previous falls, medications and Orientations-Memory-Concentrations test. Data assessment through histograms and Shapiro Wilk tests and reported by means and standard deviations, medians and interquartile ranges, and numbers and percentages.
Through study completion, app. 8 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin Eriksen, Aalborg University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 6, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 6, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-096

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Balance; Distorted

Clinical Trials on Dual task balance test

Subscribe