An Open-label, Ascending, Repeated Dose-finding Study of Sarilumab in Children and Adolescents With Polyarticular-course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (pcJIA) (SKYPP)

October 7, 2024 updated by: Sanofi

An Open-label, Sequential, Ascending, Repeated Dose-finding Study of Sarilumab, Administered With Subcutaneous (SC) Injection, in Children and Adolescents, Aged 2 to 17 Years, With Polyarticular-course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (pcJIA) Followed by an Extension Phase

Primary Objective:

To describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of sarilumab in participants aged 2-17 years with Polyarticular-course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (pcJIA) in order to identify the dose and regimen for adequate treatment of this population

Secondary Objective:

To describe the pharmacodynamic (PD) profile, the efficacy and the long-term safety of sarilumab in participants with pcJIA.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

For 73 participants enrolled in the dose-finding and second portions, the total study duration per participant was up to 166 weeks that consists of a 4- week screening, a 12-week core treatment phase, a 144-week extension phase, and a 6-week post-treatment follow-up. For 29 participants enrolled in the third portion, the total study duration per participant was up to 106 weeks that consists of a 4- week screening, a 12-week core treatment phase, a 84-week extension phase, and a 6-week post-treatment follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tucumán, Argentina, T4000AXL
        • Investigational Site Number : 0320004
    • Buenos Aires
      • Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1270AAN
        • Investigational Site Number : 0320060
    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3T1C5
        • Investigational Site Number : 1240112
    • Biobío
      • Concepcion, Biobío, Chile
        • Investigational Site Number : 1520016
      • Brno, Czechia, 62500
        • Investigational Site Number : 2030041
      • Helsinki, Finland, 00029 HUS
        • Investigational Site Number : 2460040
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Investigational Site Number : 2500040
      • Berlin, Germany, 13125
        • Investigational Site Number : 2760064
      • Bremen, Germany, 28205
        • Investigational Site Number : 2760061
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22081
        • Investigational Site Number : 2760062
      • Sankt Augustin, Germany, 53757
        • Investigational Site Number : 2760060
      • Roma, Italy
        • Investigational Site Number : 3800052
    • Jalisco
      • Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44620
        • Investigational Site Number : 4840061
    • Nuevo León
      • Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, 64460
        • Investigational Site Number : 4840060
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 EA
        • Investigational Site Number : 5280020
    • Kujawsko-pomorskie
      • Bydgoszcz, Kujawsko-pomorskie, Poland, 85-667
        • Investigational Site Number : 6160074
    • Lubuskie
      • Lublin, Lubuskie, Poland, 20-093
        • Investigational Site Number : 6160070
    • Lódzkie
      • Lodz, Lódzkie, Poland, 91-738
        • Investigational Site Number : 6160071
    • Malopolskie
      • Krakow, Malopolskie, Poland, 31-503
        • Investigational Site Number : 6160073
    • Slaskie
      • Sosnowiec, Slaskie, Poland, 41-218
        • Investigational Site Number : 6160072
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 115522
        • Investigational Site Number : 6430001
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198
        • Investigational Site Number : 6430062
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991
        • Investigational Site Number : 6430063
      • Madrid, Spain, 28009
        • Investigational Site Number : 7240053
      • Valencia, Spain, 46026
        • Investigational Site Number : 7240051
    • Catalunya [Cataluña]
      • Esplugues de Llobregat, Catalunya [Cataluña], Spain, 08950
        • Investigational Site Number : 7240050
    • Madrid, Comunidad De
      • Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad De, Spain, 28046
        • Investigational Site Number : 7240052
      • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L12 2AP
        • Investigational Site Number : 8260033
    • London, City Of
      • London, London, City Of, United Kingdom, WC1N 3JH
        • Investigational Site Number : 8260031
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Children's Hospital Los Angeles Site Number : 8400416

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria :

  • Male and female participants aged ≥2 and ≤17 years (or country specified age requirement) at the time of the screening visit.
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid factor-negative or rheumatoid factor positive polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) subtype or oligoarticular extended JIA subtype according to the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2001 Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Classification Criteria with at least 5 active joints as per American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition for "active arthritis" at Screening
  • Participant with an inadequate response to current treatment and considered as a candidate for a biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) as per investigator's judgment

Exclusion criteria:

  • Body weight <10 kg or >60 kg for participants enrolled in the 3 ascending dose cohorts, then body weight <10 kg for participants subsequently enrolled at the selected dose-regimen.
  • If nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [including cyclo oxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX-2)] taken, dose stable for <2 weeks prior to the baseline visit and/or dosing prescribed outside of approved label.
  • If non-biologic DMARD taken, dose stable for <6 weeks prior to the baseline visit or at a dose exceeding the recommended dose as per local labeling.
  • If oral glucocorticoid taken, dose exceeding equivalent prednisone dose 0.5 mg/kg/day (or 30 mg/day) within 2 weeks prior to baseline.
  • Use of parenteral or intra-articular glucocorticoid injection within 4 weeks prior to baseline.
  • Prior treatment with anti-interleukin 6 (IL-6) or IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) antagonist therapies, including but not limited to tocilizumab or sarilumab.
  • Treatment with any biologic treatment for pcJIA within 5 half-lives prior to the first dose of sarilumab.
  • Treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of sarilumab; and treatment with growth hormone within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of sarilumab (the required off treatment periods and procedures may vary according to local requirements).
  • Treatment with any investigational biologic or non-biologic product within 8 weeks or 5 half-lives prior to baseline, whichever is longer.
  • Lipid lowering drug stable for less than 6 weeks prior to screening.
  • Exclusion related to tuberculosis (TB).
  • Exclusion criteria related to past or current infection other than tuberculosis.
  • Any live, attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit, such as varicella-zoster, oral polio, rubella vaccines. Killed or inactive vaccine may be permitted based on the Investigator's judgment.
  • Exclusion related to history of a systemic hypersensitivity reaction to any biologic drug and known hypersensitivity to any constituent of the product.
  • Laboratory abnormalities at the screening visit (identified by the central laboratory).
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding female adolescent participants.

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sarilumab
Participants received one of three ascending dose regimens of sarilumab by subcutaneous (SC) injection based on body weight. All the participants received the selected dose regimen once this was identified. Sarilumab was given during 12-week core treatment phase followed by an extension treatment phase (144 weeks for 73 participants enrolled in dose-finding and second portions and 84 weeks for approximately 29 participants enrolled in third portion)
Pharmaceutical form:Solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous
Other Names:
  • SAR153191 (REGN88)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Sarilumab at Week 12
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
The Cmax was defined as maximum serum concentration. The values reported are mean and standard deviation.
Pre-dose on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve Using the Trapezoidal Method During a Dose Interval (AUC0-t) of Sarilumab at Week 12
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
The AUC0-t was defined as area under the concentration in serum versus time curve calculated using the trapezoidal method during a dose interval (tau). The values reported are mean and standard deviation.
Pre-dose on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Concentration Before Treatment Administration During Repeated Dosing (Ctrough) of Sarilumab at Week 12
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
The Ctrough was defined as concentration observed before treatment administration during repeated dosing from baseline to Week 12. The values reported are mean and standard deviation.
Pre-dose on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cohorts 1 and 3: Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Serum concentrations of hs-CRP was determined to assess the Pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of sarilumab. The values reported are mean and standard deviation.
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Serum concentrations of hs-CRP was determined to assess the PD effects of sarilumab. The values reported are mean and standard deviation.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Serum concentrations of IL-6 was determined to assess the PD effects of sarilumab. The values reported are mean and standard deviation.
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Total Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Serum concentrations of sIL-6R was determined to assess the PD effects of sarilumab. The values reported are mean and standard deviation.
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Cohorts 1 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology (JIA ACR) 30 Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
JIA ACR30 response was defined as a participant with at least 3 out of the 6 JIA core set variables with >= 30% improvement from baseline with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by >= 30%.
Week 12
Cohort 2: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology 30 Response at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
JIA ACR30 response was defined as a participant with at least 3 out of the 6 JIA core set variables with >= 30% improvement from baseline with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by >= 30%.
Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology 50 Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
JIA ACR50 response was defined as a participant with at least 3 out of the 6 JIA core set variables with >= 50% improvement from baseline with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by >= 30%.
Week 12
Cohort 2: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology 50 Response at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
JIA ACR50 response was defined as a participant with at least 3 out of the 6 JIA core set variables with >= 50% improvement from baseline with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by >= 30%.
Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology 70 Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
JIA ACR70 response was defined as a participant with at least 3 out of the 6 JIA core set variables with >= 70% improvement from baseline with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by >= 30%.
Week 12
Cohort 2: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology 70 Response at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
JIA ACR70 response was defined as a participant with at least 3 out of the 6 JIA core set variables with >= 70% improvement from baseline with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by >= 30%.
Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology 90 Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
JIA ACR90 response was defined as a participant with at least 3 out of the 6 JIA core set variables with >= 90% improvement from baseline with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by >= 30%.
Week 12
Cohort 2: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology 90 Response at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
JIA ACR90 response was defined as a participant with at least 3 out of the 6 JIA core set variables with >= 90% improvement from baseline with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by >= 30%.
Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology 100 Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
JIA ACR100 response was defined as a participant with at least 3 out of the 6 JIA core set variables with >= 100% improvement from baseline with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by >= 30%.
Week 12
Cohort 2: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology 100 Response at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
JIA ACR100 response was defined as a participant with at least 3 out of the 6 JIA core set variables with >= 100% improvement from baseline with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsened by >= 30%.
Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, Activity Joint Count-71, at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using visual analog scale (VAS), Childhood Health Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) and hs-CRP. Activity joint count-71 was calculated as sum (joints with active arthritis)*(71/number of joints with assessment).
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, Activity Joint Count-71, at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. Activity joint count-71 was calculated as sum (joints with active arthritis)*(71/number of joints with assessment).
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, Limited Motion Joint Count, at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. Limited motion joint count was calculated as sum (joints with limited motion)*(67/number of joints with assessment).
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, Limited Motion Joint Count, at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. Limited motion joint count was calculated as sum (joints with limited motion)*(67/number of joints with assessment).
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. The CHAQ questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain is scored on a 4 point scale ranges from 0 to 3: 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do). An additional response of "not applicable" is available to indicate activities the participant is unable to perform because he/she is too young. The CHAQ-DI total score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score. This overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. The CHAQ questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain is scored on a 4 point scale ranges from 0 to 3: 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do). An additional response of "not applicable" is available to indicate activities the participant is unable to perform because he/she is too young. The CHAQ-DI total score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score. This overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, C-Reactive Protein, at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. Serum concentrations of hs-CRP was determined to assess the PD effects of sarilumab.
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, C-Reactive Protein, at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. Serum concentrations of hs-CRP was determined to assess the PD effects of sarilumab.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity, at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. Physician global assessment of disease activity was assessed on an anchored 100 mm horizontal VAS score ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 is considered the best disease activity (no disease activity) and 10 the worst (most disease activity). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity, at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. Physician global assessment of disease activity was assessed on an anchored 100 mm horizontal VAS score ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 is considered the best disease activity (no disease activity) and 10 the worst (most disease activity). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, Participant/Parent Assessment of Overall Well-Being, at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. Participant/parent assessment of overall well-being was rated on an anchored 100 mm horizontal VAS score ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 is considered the best disease activity (no disease activity) and 10 the worst (most disease activity). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology Component, Participant/Parent Assessment of Overall Well-Being, at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
The JIA ACR components included joints with active arthritis (0 to 71 joints), joints with limited motion (0 to 67 joints), physician global assessment of disease activity and participant/parent assessment of overall well-being using VAS, CHAQ-DI and hs-CRP. Participant/parent assessment of overall well-being was rated on an anchored 100 mm horizontal VAS score ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 is considered the best disease activity (no disease activity) and 10 the worst (most disease activity). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Cohorts 1 and 3: Mean Change From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-27) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
The JADAS is used for assessment of disease activity, and it includes 4 measures: Physician global assessment of disease activity (VAS range: 0 to10; where 0= no activity and 10= maximum activity), parent/participant global assessment of well-being (VAS range: 0 to 10; where 0= no activity and10= maximum activity), count of joints with active disease (range: 0 to 27; where 0= no activity and 27= maximum activity), and index of inflammation determined by hs-CRP or ESR (normalized scale range: 0 to 10; where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximum disease activity). The JADAS total score is calculated as the simple sum of the scores of its 4 components. The total score ranges from 0 to 57 where 0= no disease activity and 57= maximum disease activity. Higher scores indicate higher disease activity. Clinical JADAS-27 is without CRP or ESR component and score ranges from 0 to 47 where 0= no disease activity and 47= maximum disease activity.
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Cohort 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score at Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
The JADAS is used for assessment of disease activity, and it includes 4 measures: Physician global assessment of disease activity (VAS range: 0 to10; where 0= no activity and 10= maximum activity), parent/participant global assessment of well-being (VAS range: 0 to 10; where 0= no activity and10= maximum activity), count of joints with active disease (range: 0 to 27; where 0= no activity and 27= maximum activity), and index of inflammation determined by hs-CRP or ESR (normalized scale range: 0 to 10; where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximum disease activity). The JADAS total score is calculated as the simple sum of the scores of its 4 components. The total score ranges from 0 to 57 where 0= no disease activity and 57= maximum disease activity. Higher scores indicate higher disease activity. Clinical JADAS-27 is without CRP or ESR component and score ranges from 0 to 47 where 0= no disease activity and 47= maximum disease activity.
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96, and 156
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From the first administration of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of treatment period, maximum of 156 weeks for portions 1 and 2 and 96 weeks for portion 3
An adverse events (AEs) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or in a clinical investigation participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death or is life-threatening or requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is an important medical event. TEAEs are defined as AEs that develop or worsen during the on-treatment period [that is, from the time of first dose of study treatment up to 6 weeks after the last administration of the study treatment].
From the first administration of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of treatment period, maximum of 156 weeks for portions 1 and 2 and 96 weeks for portion 3
Number of Participants With Local Site Reactions
Time Frame: From the first administration of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of treatment period, maximum of 156 weeks for portions 1 and 2 and 96 weeks for portion 3
Participants were observed for at least 30 minutes after each study treatment administration either on site or at home and any local reactions were noted in the diary regardless of being clinically significant.
From the first administration of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of treatment period, maximum of 156 weeks for portions 1 and 2 and 96 weeks for portion 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Clinical Sciences & Operations, Sanofi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 6, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

May 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DRI13925
  • 2015-003999-79 (EudraCT Number)
  • U1111-1177-3487 (Registry Identifier: ICTRP)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Sarilumab

Subscribe